Why do you have to travel?

Could it be that because the empire's propaganda has been successful for too long, some suppressed and painful voices began to shout, to travel and to see the world. It's as if it's a waste of life if you don't travel, and you're sorry for your hard-earned money if you don't see the world.

Distortion is distortion, and it will always be able to find an explanation, and it will always be able to make people think that only by doing something is not a waste of life. At the end of the day, it's about being scared of life.

Really, this fear is simply omnipresent, and it seems that in every action, fear can be seen.

It's over!

This is not right, that is not right, is there any survival value in the role of Yuan Changwen?

According to the theory of society, no matter whether it is successful or not, at least it must make a certain contribution to society, even if it is just a happy family, it is also a kind of social contribution. And what about me, what can I do but destroy the foundations of society?

Everyone is busy, everyone is complaining, everyone is laughing, everyone is suffering, everyone is laughing, everyone is trying, everyone is anxious, everyone is joy, everyone is trying to achieve their dreams.

I'm here to kill what bullshit is false and what shit is true to touch.

With no way out, I can't find the problem that's holding me back. There is no way back, let me follow a false and distorted goal, to fight and fight, I have no impulse at all.

Why not die?

It's not physical death, that's too simple. Why is the character of Yuan Changwen not dead?

Yuan Changwen frowned, even in the depths of the lake, he could vaguely see that distorted face.

What else is there? What am I missing? What am I still taking as real?

A feeling of discomfort enveloped Yuan Changwen, it was not very strong, but it seemed that something wanted to shatter this body and break out of the cocoon. However, the strength is not enough, and it just puts the body in an uncomfortable state.

Maybe it's depression, maybe it's melancholy, but for Yuan Changwen, none of that matters anymore. All explanations of a state are generalizations. Generalization, on the other hand, is to take only the important part or the majority of the part, and ignore the remaining details.

Isn't that prejudice?

It's just that I used to think that bias is to generalize the whole facts with a small part of the facts. Isn't it also a bias to summarize all the facts with most of the facts?

What's more, how do I know that that's the majority of the truth?

Characters always like to summarize and always like to put something into words. Because in this way, it is easy to express one's own opinions, and it is easy for others to understand to obtain the affirmation or denial of others.

As I always thought, beautiful words are more pleasing to the eye than saliva. Especially for the description of shocking scenery, often the ornate words will bring different feelings.

However, no one would say that their words could completely restore the beauty of the time, and no one would dare to say that their words could express the feelings of the time very accurately.

Since it can't be expressed, there is no essential difference between "suspected to be the Milky Way falling for nine days" and "Sleep, it's too shocking". They can't express the state of mind at that time, and they all barely show the picture at that time.

Why do you have to express it? It seems that people with good writing skills will be more popular. This kind of welcome is the welcome between the characters, the tacit understanding between the characters, and always judging something as the goal to pursue. And, convinced of this, anyone who dares to question will be surrounded by strong emotions.

When the shock came, I felt it. Any words and images used will only destroy this shock, and it is just a distortion in the mind. And this distortion may restore the feeling at the time to some extent, but it can never be completely restored.

In that case, why bother to express it?

It seems that a piece of text, an image, is a kind of commemoration. But what is the commemoration of what to remember? After many years have passed, can we look at the words and images and fully recall the feelings of that time?

If not, then what's the point of keeping words and images, and how much of them are for show-off and show-off?

I always imagine that when I am old, I look at these words and images with gray hair and reading glasses, full of embarrassment, thinking about how it was back then. What if, at that time, there was no one around?

Memories are always precious, why?

Because the character survives on these things, if a person wakes up every morning without the memory of the past, then it is completely possible to become a new person again. Have new values, have new patterns of behavior, have new ways of thinking.

Why do we have to firmly grasp those so-called memories, the so-called beauty and not let go?

That's right, humanity as a species, a species that can create its own civilization, naturally pursues something good. And good things are always in the minority, and they are easy to disappear. Then, it is a very reasonable behavior to keep as much good as possible.

Look, what am I doing? This kind of thing has to be killed, and it seems to have been killed, and it is just a record of the process of being killed.

Why do you want to record the beautiful scenery for the future to reminisce? Is it because it will be boring in the future, so it will be recalled? Is it to show off the evidence, so you want to record it? Do you want to listen to the admiration and admiration of everyone in the circle of friends?

Or, you want to be a better version of yourself and show off to others. I am afraid that I am not as good as others, I am afraid that I have not been to so many places, I am afraid that I will become a laughing stock in the circle, and I am afraid that I have not been anywhere except the garden downstairs when everyone talks about travel.

It's a pity to always weigh it up with a twist in your mind, such as quitting your job and not walking around, but looking for another job. For example, flying to a foreign city and only sleeping at an international airport for a few days without appreciating any exotic scenery is a waste.

"You've quit your job, and it's a shame that you don't go to play well and look at those landscapes. I don't have time to go, you're wasting your life!"

"How many days did you sleep at an airport abroad? Why don't you go and see the city? Why don't you go and see the scenery? And the exotic atmosphere that you've never seen before? Sleep at the airport for a few days? You're wasting too much time and money, aren't you?"

There is no way to refute it, no matter how you say it, it makes sense. It's just that some truths are accepted by the public, and some truths are not accepted by the public. Reasoning can never be finished. Because the truth is all artificially set, where there is an end.

Distortion is distortion, no matter how many people believe in distortions, no matter how beautiful words are whitewashed, these are just distortions in the mind.