No matter how hard the characters try, it's impossible to capture the truth.

Because there are no characters in reality, and there is no space where there is something called "reality" that allows the character to reach out and grab it.

It's impossible to do.

In other words, even after touching the truth, the performance of Yuan Changwen's role is still false. It's just that this thinking has become very much like a movie screen, and you can always simulate that awareness for mental activity.

But at the end of the day, it's still false.

So, what's going on here?

Yuan Changwen found that he would always think about what happened after the killing, these things that didn't need to be worried about at all, but they always occupied an important place in his mind. It seems that it is natural to know what will happen after that, so think carefully.

However, I couldn't do it myself. No matter how much you reason, no matter how much you imagine, it's just a guess. If it's speculation, why bother thinking about it, and why take speculation as an affirmative sentence?

That awareness is everything, so anything that isn't that awareness is false and non-existent. In that case, there is no need to bother looking for something to kill, just think about what I think can't happen, then this is the falsehood that I cling to.

Funnily enough, I think "big things" like "the end of the world can happen", "parents can die", "you can live on the streets", "you can die" and so on. But for some small things, they cling to it and don't let go, such as "pets can't mess up the house" and so on.

Why can't pets mess up the house? Because then I'm going to have to reorganize it, which is a hassle.

Why do I have to tidy up my house? Because it's very comfortable and clean.

Why do you have to live comfortably and cleanly? Because the character likes it, and will leave a clean character attribute in the eyes of others.

However, regardless of whether the character catches the fake or not, the character itself is fake. Just like Mario is fake no matter what skill he gets, not only the skill is fake, but even Mario himself is fake.

So why bother with whether the characters grab something?

Unless I can keep the spectator mode all the time, I can simulate the position of awareness at any time, no matter what the character insists on, and I can take the whole world as fake.

I can't do that, so I just have to see what I'm still holding onto, so I can slash ...... Is it?

Wrong.

Am I going to do nothing, kill nothing, just say "this is fake" when the character makes any choice, and that's it?

If it is false, why should we weigh it according to the false choice?

After being false, then there will inevitably be an attitude of "being false", and it doesn't matter whether it is false or not. If it is really regarded as false, even if it acts according to the falsehood on a whim, it will naturally lose these falsehoods over time.

Wrong.

What am I doing, justifying the role, reluctant to discard the falsehood?

So, "pets can't mess with the house" and "pets can't mess with the house" are both false, what's the difference between catching one?

Damn it!

Are you still in duality? After so many chapters, are you still going around in duality?

Suddenly confused, pets can either mess up the house or not. How is it possible to be free from this duality?

Or rather, I don't have a rule that I have to do. Sometimes pets can mess up the house, sometimes pets can't. I don't know what emotions I feel when my pet messes up the house, maybe angry, maybe I like it, maybe it doesn't matter.

So, the answer is, still, don't know?

Once the time is removed, the question seems ridiculous, and "don't know" becomes the only answer. Thinking about the future itself is a falsehood, so how can any inference based on this falsehood be true?

Just like what I'm confused about, either pets can or can't, how can there be a third option? The only way to get out of the binary opposition is to destroy the problem directly, without thinking about the future, without defining the character.

I'm not saying "pets can mess with the house" or "pets can't mess with the house", but I don't know.

This feeling is so, because I know that my pet will tidy up the house, but I have to force myself not to judge the good or bad, and force myself to stop believing the distortion in my head.

Isn't that stupid?

Anyone with a normal IQ will let things develop according to their own ideas, will expect things to unfold in a good direction, and will choose an idea that makes them comfortable. I, on the other hand, have to forcibly discard these normal thoughts.

If you go along with it, you will become an adult, and if you go against it, you will become an immortal?

Yuan Changwen remembered this rotten sentence, but many times, the predecessors who explored the truth will leave some golden keys for future generations. As long as you grasp this key, you can slowly embark on the path of slashing. I can't go into too much detail or too much detail, because there's nothing to say.

Thinking for yourself is the key to the whole killing. If you could touch the truth by studying the books, codexes, and speeches of your predecessors, then the world would have been full of people who touched the real world.

After all, it's not quite difficult to memorize these classics. In this world, there are too many people who can learn, and there are no longer a few people who are willing to spend their efforts, work hard, and endure hardships.

Why aren't so many people touching the truth? Perhaps, everybody went in the opposite direction. are constantly enriching the characters, such as kindness, kindness, compassion, and so on. In this dualistic world, these qualities are full of meaning and will be recognized by all.

Who would think that mercy is a bad thing?

But falsehood is falsehood, and judging good or bad is itself in falsehood.

It is also interesting to think that Shakyamuni's behavior is definitely irresponsible in today's view. Abandoning his wife, ignoring his family, and giving up his responsibilities as a prince, he just seeks the truth of what the hell he is.

I don't know how this is explained within the sect, but if anyone does this, it seems that everyone will be criticized and blamed. Just like Shakyamuni can abandon his family, and as a disciple of the sect, why should he treat his parents well and improve his sense of responsibility?

Yuan Changwen thought of himself, maybe in the empire, his family had scolded him to death. There are others, perhaps, who will think that this so-called first person of the empire, is just an irresponsible scumbag.

Yes, what is the significance of these actions in the world of duality? Not only is it meaningless, but it destroys this orchestrated dream.

It's a good "if you go along with you, you will become an adult, and if you go against it, you will become an immortal", but it's a pity that under the character's means of survival, the word "reverse" is completely interpreted as a kind of hard work, a desire to stand at the pinnacle of life.