There is no need to surrender or accept fate!

It's just to make life better, but it's not necessary. Does it matter whether the character surrenders or not? It doesn't matter at all, it doesn't matter what the character does.

It doesn't matter whether the character is good or evil, whether the character surrenders or complains, whether the character is spiritual or lifeless, whether the character is sunny or gloomy and mean.

It doesn't matter at all, those who think that the characters should be, that life should be how they should be, are just artificially distorted. What is the poetry of life, what is the aesthetics of life, what is working hard to cherish time, and what is old without madness...... It's all just an artificial distortion, just like preferences.

What is there to argue about whether you like to eat bitter gourd or not? These are just personal preferences, and what qualifications do they have to rise to the level of life and be accompanied by the word "must"?

Why should I take this shit for real?

There is nothing wrong with the character wanting to surrender, wanting to become an immortal, and wanting to be free. But is there anything wrong with characters who like to resist, who like to fight, who like to weigh with the twists in their heads?

I'm being manipulated by the twist in my head, I've hummed falsehood, I'm going to kill those who know and believe, it's just me. Why persuade others? Why change other people's lifestyles? Why do you want to appear that only you are right and that other people's ways of life are wrong?

Is there anything wrong with someone who likes to walk backwards, someone who likes to go against the current, someone who likes to complain about a frizzy life, someone who likes shit in their heads?

Sadly, or alas, the origin of this word is a distortion in the mind. When I want to teach others, it's best to look at my own inner impulses. Is it true that the idea that someone else is wasting their time, that someone else has abandoned the precious energy of life?

Assertions based on countless assumptions, which in itself need to be killed.

When can personal preferences become real? Publishing a book openly and grandly, and standing on a high place to publicize it, this "must" is simply nonsense.

It seems that it is very spiritual to say that you surrender and live in the moment and so on. It seems that listening to these words can change your life, make yourself more attractive, and make your life easier.

But the idea that life must surrender is itself a distortion.

I'll surrender because I hate the twist in my head, because I'm tired of thinking, because I'm tired of being able to manipulate me with words that are obviously. Thinking through the twist of the mind is tantamount to a grain of sand trying to dominate the beach, how ridiculous and nonsense.

However, this is still not a reason for "life must surrender", it is just my personal preference. Perhaps, one day I suddenly had a whim, I wanted to go against the current, and I wanted to see what life was like in chaos. Right, some people just like to suddenly overturn the boat while rowing, and then straighten the boat themselves, what's not okay?

Why can't this kind of unbelievable words and deeds happen when someone suddenly wants to roll around while walking? Is it okay to suddenly want to hit someone? Is it okay to suddenly want to destroy?

These words and deeds completely shattered the distortion in the mind, what life should not complain, what life must surrender, what life should think twice, what life should know how to be grateful, and what life should take a step back......

When I don't surrender, it's when my mind is twisted and arrogant, what are you waiting for if I don't kill?

There is no essential difference between killing and any character's words and deeds, it is a personal preference. No matter what personal preference, no matter how many followers that personal preference has, it can't change that it's just a personal preference.

Isn't it nonsense to elevate personal preferences to the level of human beings and to the code of conduct for each individual? What about Confucius, what about that set of doctrines, and what about those doctrines that have been handed down for thousands of years? It is still just a man-made distortion, it is still just a personal preference, and it is still just wishful thinking.

Perhaps, popular, perhaps, by the king's preference. But it's not real at all, and the distortions in your head are never real.

Some people like to have a twist in their minds, especially about kindness and compassion and things like that, and always think that good is rewarded. Even, when you can do good deeds but don't do good deeds, you will feel uncomfortable, regretful, and afraid.

There's nothing wrong with that, what's wrong?

It's just that I don't want to be manipulated by this kind of thing, it's just that I can't stand it and pretend to be something else when I'm afraid. A person who is firmly committed to goodness is still distorted, which makes me very uncomfortable.

Kindness is just a humble prayer, and the fear of not doing good deeds is no different from the fear of not having money, a car, or a house. As long as you get close to this kind of person who sticks to kindness, you will find that he exudes a burst of worry, like the stench of a piece of dog shit.

I don't want to get close, that self-definition protected by strong emotions, whatever the specifics, is like a steaming piece of shit. I don't want to find out what kind of shit is, or if there's any sparkle in the shit. That strong emotion alone was enough to keep me away from this piece of shit.

The so-called interpersonal relationships have disappeared in my mind, not because I don't care about interpersonal relationships, but because I don't need interpersonal relationships at all. In a false world, in a world where there is no causal relationship, the idea of relying on human relationships for some kind of convenience is nonsense in itself.

What I want will come naturally, and as long as it is not based on fear, not out of my head, then the world will naturally give me feedback. Of course, it doesn't matter if you don't give feedback, the role of Yuan Changwen is not me at all, what else is there to worry about?

Thinking that you have to surrender because it will make things go so much better. Is it possible? Can surrender really make a difference in the world?

.

The very idea that you have to surrender is an obstacle to surrender. The strange thing is that when you really surrender and accept your fate, you don't think about what will change smoothly and what world will start to conform to you. But that's what happened.

When I need it, when I am afraid, when I plead so much, it seems as if Heaven will ignore me. And when I surrendered and accepted my fate, when I was relieved, when I didn't think that these things had to happen, the Nima thing happened.

Is it possible to surrender for the sake of the sake of the smooth running of things? I don't know, I didn't start in that direction anyway.

On the contrary, the very idea of having to surrender requires being killed. A distortion in the mind is a distortion, and whatever the content is, it must be killed.

So, what about the chop itself?

Yuan Changwen thought about this question again, many of the problems encountered before in the chapter, is the killing considered necessary, is it considered a distortion in the brain? Will he be killed and manipulated?

It should be, but why should I be reasonable? This kind of logical reasoning doesn't stop me from killing, and if I let go of the twist in my head because of it, it's just a reassurance.