Come on, all who should come.

Yuan Changwen didn't know what he was still looking forward to, becoming an immortal, becoming the overlord of the universe, breaking through the barrier of time and space with one punch? This life drama had already set the ending, and he was just experiencing it in it.

Come to the world for an early walk, touch the all-round three-dimensional senses, temporarily close the memory, and get the supreme experience of super VIP. It's so real, what's not to be satisfied with?

Unfortunately, there is an assumption in this statement, which is the linear passage of time. It's as if things really happened one after the other, even though it was a movie, even though it was designed in advance, and even though time existed at the same time, it still assumed a linear passage of time.

I don't know if anything happened before.

Those who claim that time exists at the same time, and those who claim that time is immovable, are the ones who move. Or, imagine that time is a mural in which we travel and thus cause the illusion of time moving or something. These are all acknowledgments that they have happened in the past, that they have really happened.

There is no past, no time, all are just visual elements that are perceived at this moment. I can be sure that the awareness is real, and as for the rest, it's just possible. Although various theories can explain various phenomena well, they are ultimately theories based on various assumptions.

Perhaps, the simultaneous use of time will make me feel that life is easier. Perhaps, in the words of Super VIP, I can let go of those unnecessary burdens in life.

However, these are only speculations after all, and they are just baseless affirmations after all. None of this has anything to do with reality, and I don't have any reason to stop there. Holding on to these things is also a kind of self-definition in itself.

Whether or not there is a self-definition is not the point, but whether I believe that these self-definitions are true.

I don't know if it actually happened in the past, so those other explanations have dissipated. Using movies as a metaphor for the simultaneous existence of time, to metaphorize that all this is predetermined, is misleading, "everything in the past has really happened".

Everything about the past is just my memory, and it's just the visual elements that I perceive at the moment. I'm not sure exactly how long this happened, whether there's really a past, or even if there's a table.

Since it is impossible to be sure, then the metaphor of the so-called simultaneous existence of time, or the sensory experience of super VIP, is misleading. In other words, after some stubborn ideas have been cleared of these theories and metaphors, they must also be discarded.

Holding on to these theories and metaphors and not letting go will only hold you back. At the end of the day, completely discard honesty and turn into a character with good theory and knowledge. A character with a lot of experience, a character who talks endlessly and has a hands-on slashing experience.

It's still just a character.

If it's not done, it's not done, and the slaughter will continue, which is not negotiable at all. To be honest to the point of cruelty is to allow yourself to constantly discard the shit you have learned.

Yuan Changwen felt that he had surpassed his predecessors, and those great scholars in history were inferior to him. Ironically, it is not because you know more than others, on the contrary, it is because others know too much that you are inferior to yourself.

No matter what the theory, it cannot escape the category of "the picture element that is perceived at the moment". Maybe the person who tells the theory doesn't think it himself, but all theories imply it.

For example, if time exists at the same time, then it is still aware at the moment, and it is still just a picture element.

The past seemed very real, the last moment I was sitting in the bedroom, this moment I was sitting in the living room, and all the memories of the time I sat in the bedroom before, are so real. Whoever wants to doubt that he did not walk from the bedroom to the living room is simply mentally problematic.

But how do I know for sure? How do I know for sure I've actually been in my bedroom?

No matter how hard you try to confirm it, you can't escape that it's just a memory in your head. Moreover, no matter how much so-called objective evidence there is, it is only a visual element that is perceived at the moment.

For example, when I was recording a video, I was looking at the VCR in the living room and found that the picture showed that I had come out of the bedroom earlier. However, the image of the video recorder is only a visual element that is perceived at the moment, can it prove the past?

The video recorder is recording the past? How can I be sure of that?

All I can say is that at this moment I noticed a VCR showing a video of me walking from my bedroom to the living room. Also, at this moment, I realized that "the VCR is recording from the past" and so on. But is it possible to determine the existence of the past based on these?

Since I'm not sure I walked from the bedroom to the living room, the so-called simultaneous existence of time is self-defeating. There is no need to continue to discuss whether time exists at the same time, those arguments have all dissipated, and only a theory floats out of thin air.

How long have I been around?

Hehe, this question is also a good one, enough to destroy most of the civet fox whistle empty talk. Can I be sure that I grew up until now? Can I really be sure that I went through what I called a childhood? Can I really be sure that I walked from the bedroom to the living room?

I can't confirm the above question. But I can confirm that all of them are just visual elements that I perceive at the moment. I have memories of "I walked from the bedroom to the living room", and I can perceive the relevant elements at the moment, and they seem very real.

Without being serious, I can shrug my shoulders and show that I don't care. But now it's a slash, and unreal is unreal, or it's okay to pretend that these are real...... No, I'm not there yet.

Pretending that these are real, then the premise is that I first think that these are not real, and then for the convenience of life, I pretend that these are real. Also, try not to discuss these things with others.

However, I did not reach such a state, and I still believed that it was true. Therefore, the so-called pretending to be real is nothing more than a deception of the characters. In other words, these words are spoken only when discussing with others to demonstrate one's supreme thinking ability.

Shit.

I still think that I have the ability to influence the world, and I always think that this thing happens and that thing happens. But in fact, these are only the pictorial elements that are perceived at the moment, and it seems that one pictorial element leads to the creation of another.

It's still about association, it's still about explaining picture elements with picture elements.

Yuan Changwen found that "that awareness is everything" has been ingrained in his mind. I should be able to kill it and I should be able to see the day it ends. I'm still feeling uncomfortable, but I think there will be an end to it.

And he is slashing time hard, what is this expectation?