There is nothing to cherish, falsehood is falsehood, and those so-called cherishing are likewise just an unfounded affirmation. Only once, in this case, will words like "cherish" be used. So, how do I know I only have one life?

How do I know that this life is the only life? Maybe I've been through the same life countless times. It's not like the characters, and then it's just a change in the storyline. It's exactly the same, and everything is exactly the same.

Isn't it possible to present the elements of the picture in this way? Right, judging by the distortion in the mind, it may be boring or not cost-effective, but it does not deny the possibility of such a thing.

Since there are all possibilities, why should I stand on one side of the duality? Directly take an argument as true? And it's not that I'm pretending that an argument is true, it's that the argument pulls me directly.

The distortion in my head easily manipulated me, without suspense, with ease.

Friendship is not qualified to hinder, no matter how deep the friendship is. It's not wrong to think that this kind of friendship is rare, and to think that it's a pity to lose this kind of friendship. The question is, who's using whom?

My personal preference is to kill, as if this sentence can silence everyone's discussion and argument. It doesn't matter if it's right or wrong, it's just my personal preference, and I'm not trying to persuade people to kill them, and I haven't said how great a kill is.

It's all a stage play for the characters, and there is no difference between slashing and.

And judging that friendship is rare and should be cherished, is the distortion in the mind. I don't have any interest in the distortions in my head, prejudice is prejudice, and even the occasional right doesn't mean anything. What's more, the judgment of "occasionally correct" still comes from a distortion in the mind.

It's either omniscient or prejudiced.

What else is there to say, there is no room for negotiation at all. Right, it's obviously prejudice, so we still have to discuss and still want to justify prejudice, isn't this just nonsense, isn't it just a kind of appeasement.

Is he still a human being? This kind of brainless life, this inhumane way, occasionally inhumane and occasionally inhumane, can kill people and care, can be good people or bad people. Perhaps, leaving the empire by yourself is the best choice, and you should find a sparsely populated place to live quietly.

But who can be sure? What if Shunliu needs me to return to the Empire, what if I need to continue teaching my disciples? and thus arouse the anger of the Führer, so that a fight begins? Right, it can happen, maybe for me, maybe for someone else.

If there really is someone else.

I couldn't find any authenticity in the interactions between the characters. I haven't discarded these things yet, and I'm still taking others for real, but it's not long.

In the chat, it was easy for me to get caught up in the content, as if I was back in the role again, and I was working hard for the role of Yuan Changwen again. However, others have no weight, and these may just be due to inertia.

I don't know much about it, and I can't be arrogant. False means are impossible to prevent at all, and when I thought I could see through it, I was still shrouded in a thin veil. Layer after layer, the architecture is almost perfect in the real world.

I haven't finished killing yet, so I'm still in a false deception, and what reason is there to be arrogant. Perhaps, at the moment, I think that others have no weight, but are just false roundabouts, just like the soft policy in my head.

It's not about abandoning friendship, it's about not being swayed by it. There is nothing real, that kind of distortion in the mind is not worth believing at all, and those baseless affirmations are still not worth believing.

It's not as simple as "I don't want friendship", but when I need to do something similar to maintaining a relationship, I will reject it with the self-definition of "I'm a person who doesn't want friendship". It's dangerous, and care must be taken not to take sides of the duality.

Others should be like a piece of waste paper in my mind, discarded and disposed of at will. Whether it is a comrade-in-arms or a classmate, whether it is a colleague or a friend, no matter how deep the friendship is, no matter how iron the relationship is, it is not a reason to be arrogant in my mind.

Don't talk about life without relationships, and don't say anything I don't help others, how can others help me, etc. Unreal is unreal, false doesn't qualify as true, it's as simple as that.

Even the above words are also baseless affirmations, and they are still distorted in the mind. The basic facts that seem to be very reasonable, that seem to be very much in line with the experience of life observations, and that seem to be the truth, are just "I think".

That kind of strong emotion that distorts as real is not bullshit in front of me. How do I know that "if I don't help others, others won't help me?"

Right, no matter how ridiculous the question may seem, there is still no way to change that these are just speculations, just wishful thinking. Even if I'm sure, even if all my memory is like this, I still can't deny that these are just distortions in my head, just the category of "I think".

I don't know, that's the answer. It's not the opposite, it's not the opposite, it's that I don't know.

It's easy to get hit, and any content can be a boost to a fleshed out character. Even if it is a slash, it can still become a new attribute of the character. The whole thing about the characters isn't real, what am I doing?

I'm still being controlled by money, or rather, by some kind of "I want more" or "I can't get more in the future" mentality. It's still a fear of life, and it's still a hostile thing.

Unreal is unreal, and my opponent is not how to live a good life at all, nor is it about maintaining grace or peace. None of this is real, the characters are not real, I'm not real, and I'm still talking about what the hell.

Nothing has the right to be arrogant in my head, no!

Since it's not true, then I should be uncertain about things. Anything that I think is a "must", or when not acting on the distortions in my head can lead to uncomfortable and painful entanglements, needs to be killed.

That kind of firmly grasped emotion is the object of killing. It's impossible for me to kill the character, because it's just a presentation of the elements of the picture, and the absence of the character is something that the mind can't control at all.

I can see clearly how those distortions in my mind are distorted, and maybe that's all the mind can do. Some distortions make sense, some don't, but all distortions rely on strong emotions to survive, and what I want to kill is that kind of emotion that is firmly grasped, that kind of tension that I dare not let go.

Can you really kill yourself?()