There is no one else, how many times do you have to say it to understand, there is no one else at all.

Whether or not there is a real person in the false world, I can't be sure that it exists. The so-called other people are just the cognition in my head, just the picture elements that I am aware of at the moment, just the content that I am aware of.

All the behavior of others is just a conclusion of "I think". When someone else raises their hand, it is not "someone else" who raises their hand, but "I think" someone else is raising their hand.

To take it for granted that someone else raises their hand is the same as "I think" someone else raises their hand, which is just an unfounded affirmation. I don't know if someone else exists, I don't know if someone else is raising their hand, I just know that what I realize at the moment is presenting, someone else is raising their hand.

Whatever other people say is my interpretation, what I hear, and it is still the category of "I think". I don't know what people are saying, I just know what the elements of the picture that I perceive at the moment are presenting. What does it have to do with other people? Do you have to assume that there is someone else?

The point is, even if anyone else actually exists, I can't see it.

All I saw was a distortion in my head. There are various elements of the picture, and there are many things that you can't be sure of at all. It's all just what I'm aware of, but I affirm what I'm aware of, so I don't care about consciousness and only care about content.

It's not just the causal relationship between the elements of the picture, it's also the most basic role affirmation.

I see there's an apple here, but I don't think it's just a representation of the elements of the picture, just what I'm aware of. Instead, I would have assumed that there was an apple, not that the elements of the picture represented an apple, that I was not aware of an apple.

That's the most basic connection, and it seems to be a matter of course, "If there's not an apple, then how can I see an apple here?"

There are many ways, right?

And, it seems, other people's affirmations make me think that there really is an apple here. "If there's no apple here, then why can everyone see it?"

The assumption of this question is that other people are really human beings. However, I can't say for sure, others are still just graphic elements. It's like a comic strip where every character claims there's an apple, so there's really an apple?

Apple, others, and the character of Yuan Changwen are just elements that make up this picture. Everything is the same level, and it's just an infinite twist of limitations.

For the character of Yuan Changwen, Apple and others are real. Because of the presentation of picture elements, the character of Yuan Changwen was formed, and Apple and others were formed. Maybe it's a two-dimensional presentation, maybe it's a three-dimensional presentation, but none of that matters at all.

I didn't see all of this as something I was aware of, or as a visual element of awareness. Instead, I treat everything as real and build countless twists on top of it.

The first goal of dreams is to put me to sleep and make me think it is real. There's nothing wrong with falsehood, and limitations aren't an evil thing, it's all good except that it's not true.

I would regard the character of Yuan Changwen as my own, what could be more perfect than this immersive experience? Hasn't the empire been committed to research and development in this area? If it is really 100% simulated, will people in the virtual world still think that it is virtual?

Regardless of whether there is really someone else or not, but the picture elements that are perceived at the moment have already presented others, then for the character of Yuan Changwen, these realized contents are all and real.

The point is, I don't "see" these as real, but directly identify them as true. To believe that there is a universe, rather than knowing that these are merely representations of pictorial elements, to pretend that all this is real for the sake of convenience.

I didn't pretend to have parents, I didn't pretend to have someone else, I didn't pretend to have a universe, I didn't pretend that the ideas in my head were just.

On the contrary, I believe that my parents are real, I believe that I must be filial, and I believe that the role of Yuan Changwen is me.

I would think that I was this kind of thinking, and once I thought that I couldn't think, even if I thought that I would perceive other thoughts and no longer exist in the role of Yuan Changwen, there would be a panic.

The twist in my head is still haunting me, and it's something that simply can't be allowed. Of course, in fact, there is no entanglement at all, and these things are also just perceptual visual elements.

I can never deny the presentation of the elements of the picture, these things have already happened, and I have nothing to do but accept my fate. The point is, I didn't accept my fate, and all kinds of connections are still arrogant in my head.

There are also those so-called life philosophies, so-called success philosophies, which are obviously just a piece of shit but appear to be high here. It's not that I chose them, it's that they manipulate me with impunity.

The picture elements are presented, so that's it. Where does the explanation come from? Where does the correlation come from?

I saw an apple, and that was the end of it, and there was no connection with it. I don't know if there's an apple or where it came from. Perhaps other elements of the picture can be explained accordingly, but it is still just a presentation of the picture elements.

I can pretend to believe the interpretation of the picture elements, but I must know that these are only the picture elements that I perceive at the moment, and not the so-called reality.

Shit!

Yuan Changwen found out that he had been tricked again, what were he doing now? Have I already finished the killing? I have already begun to think about what will happen after the killing is completed? Or do I want to explain all this and appear that my theory is correct and perfect?

Bullshit isn't!

Before I finished it, I started thinking about what happened after I finished it, and there was only one use for doing this, and that was to make me stop killing. Anyway, they all choose to believe, so why bother to kill them? Since falsehood is good, limitations are great, and the existence of dreams is really perfect, then why should you kill yourself?

Look at it, the character just keeps fooling me, making me give up killing, give up thinking, and give up moving forward.

Unreal is unreal, and there is no right to exist.

It's not about reasoning, it's about feelings. If you hadn't been crazy, maybe you would have been defeated by the character a long time ago.

Without me, this thinking is not me. It's useless to cling to these self-definitions, and I'll still kill them in the end.

Now is not the time to stop, let alone to think you are moving forward when in fact you are stopping. I didn't slash, that is, I didn't move forward, and I didn't finish slashing yet. So as an honest person, why pretend to think about what will happen next?

The distortion in my mind is still there, the anchor that clings to the ship of life is still there, and I have already begun to fantasize about what will happen next?

Funny.