Was I mentally retarded?

Why did such an obvious contradiction just let it go? Why didn't you think about it?

Damn it!

I'm mentally retarded at the moment!

Why do we have to think about what touches the truth, and why do we think we can touch the truth?

Killing the false is what I want to do, not what is called touching the truth.

How exactly should a character touch the truth? This is a waste question because, as discussed earlier, such an obvious contradiction is simply impossible to solve.

There is an assumption in this question that in the end, there is still a character touching the real, there will still be a character, and then there will be something called "real", and the two will touch together.

It's still a binary opposition, there are still roles, and there are still "non-roles".

That is, the idea itself is a construction of a false world. Continue to the so-called god realm, the fairy realm, or some messy realm, which claims to be the highest layer and claims to be something that existed at the beginning of the world.

Unfortunately, the existence of the character must be false. No matter how many magical powers there are, whether it is the creator or the destroyer, as long as there are characters, it must be false.

How can a character touch the truth? How can this nonsense question stop me? How mentally retarded am I to find the answer?

My question is to kill the false, and what falsehood has not been killed, that's the real problem.

I'm not sure, after killing the false, you can touch the real. Even if this is the teacher's words, even if these are all the descriptions in the ancient books, even if these are the words of the founder of the practice, it is useless. I can't be sure of that, so I don't need to grab this either.

Second, I'm not sure I'll be able to finish the kill. Since I'm still slashing, since I'm not done yet, then all the focus should be on falsehood. Instead of thinking about this so-called contradiction, and trying to explain it.

The character is fake no matter what, so there is nothing wrong with fake slashing fake. How does falsehood touch the truth? How to think about "how does falsehood touch the truth" with false thinking?

Looking at it this way, this problem that bothers me is a waste problem.

Inadvertently, the character secretly changed my target. In the beginning, it was to kill falsehood, and to hate falsehood. But unconsciously, the character secretly replaces the target with touching the real.

Moreover, I also unconsciously buried a self-definition, "I am a person who strives to touch the truth and kill the false." It seems that this is the goal of Yuan Changwen's role, as if a certain work goal needs to be achieved by the role.

What if the character can't be killed, what? There is no evidence to show that the character of Yuan Changwen must be killed. Well, there's no reason why I can touch the truth.

I always think that this is a goal that a character can achieve, and I always think that a character has to achieve this goal. At this moment, I didn't finish it, so I would feel anxious and uncomfortable, and ask myself why the character of Yuan Changwen hadn't died yet.

What's why?

There is an assumption that a reasonable explanation can be found. But this hypothesis has not been tested in any way at all, and how do I know that there is a plausible answer to explain why?

It's as if everything has to make sense, everything has to be logical, everything has to be understandable to the characters.

But this is nonsense in itself, why do you think that the characters must be understandable, why do you think that these things happen in a sequential order, and most importantly, why do you think that time passes linearly?

Once the time is removed, the so-called why and the like will be gone. How do I know that the past is real, and how do I know that things are like memories in my head, step by step, to the present?

If I only exist for this second, and then I have memories of the past few decades in my head, can I claim that the past few decades have been real? Games are designed to be grandiose, and they often involve a lot of ancient legends, but does that game really start with ancient legends?

Those NPCs are spreading the word of mouth, and those NPCs are telling the story of their parents, is there really a father?

So, why hasn't the character of Yuan Changwen died yet? How do I know, anyway, it's not dead, anyway, it's still grasping something as real. That's it, although very unsatisfying, but this dissatisfaction is based on assumptions in the head.

It's my business.

The first thing I had in my mind was a hypothesis, "I can know what happened," and I hid it from sight and treated it as the truth. When you come across an answer like "I don't know", it's uncomfortable.

So, the question is not at all about answering "I don't know", but about the self-definition of "I can know the beginning and the end" in my head. That's what leads to dissatisfaction, so why don't I deal with my own brain and try to look outward for answers?

Could it be that for thousands of years, so many books, so many meanings of life, and so many vast answers to life, have not been able to meet your requirements? Either you are deliberately finding faults, or you don't care about these answers at all.

Yuan Changwen's current feeling is like having diarrhea and finding a toilet, and he released it fiercely. It feels like the whole person is all over the place, and there is nothing worth grabbing. That's it, what else is there to say?

Remove the time, the problem will no longer exist, so what's the problem?

And those assumptions, why should I answer the question on top of acknowledging these untested assumptions?

Like I asked you, do you prefer to hunt monsters with a double-barreled gun or a single-barreled gun?, is it a bit confusing, and then I explained that we assume that the monsters invade and that there are a lot of monsters, and that there are only two options: double-barreled guns and single-barreled guns.

Don't you want to answer this question at all?

Then I will continue to explain what are the advantages of a double-barreled gun, and what are the advantages of a single-barreled gun, and I still have to answer you.

What else can be answered other than that it doesn't matter?

Or just give a perfunctory answer.

I am very anxious, the monsters are coming, how can you make such a perfunctory choice? Do you know that monsters can easily kill people, how can you treat your life as child's play? Don't you need to protect your family? You don't need to protect the pure land in your heart?

Isn't it?

However, if people all over the world are anxiously preparing for the arrival of monsters, they are always in a state of readiness, and they are always on guard against the appearance of monsters. So, will those who answer that they don't care be thrown into a mental hospital?

Assumptions are assumptions, and ignoring assumptions is itself.