Touching the real means killing the character, and it will never maintain a long-term sense of gratitude, or an image of humility, kindness, and kindness. These things are just the imagination of the characters themselves.

Characters are in a world of duality, and of course there will be good and bad, so it is a very normal imagination to pile on a perfect "good" image on a saint like Buddha and Jesus. Normally, almost no one would deny it.

However, it has nothing to do with reality.

Killing characters touches the truth, and it's not people and things that are grateful, not all suffering will be told with a smile in the end, and so on. Rather, it is to be grateful for the "Tao" and create such a playground for oneself to play.

Again, the character's actions don't affect the reality at all. Moreover, goodness is like water. Then, the characters worn by saints can also flood along the terrain, and they can also do evil deeds to cause misery.

There is no point in discussing the behavior of the character at all, because "the character is not real", well, the whole sentence ends. There's no such thing as if, but, maybe, the character is not real, then killing the character, throwing the character, and the various behaviors of the character are not within the scope of my concern.

The paradox is that all my life I've equated a positive image with reality. It's like, as long as I do my best, then one day I will be able to touch the truth.

Shit!

It's just the character's fear, what if someone else hurts me? So, it's better that everybody is a moral person, everybody is a good person, so that no one hurts me.

Not fear, what is it?

Naturally, I ask questions like, what should I do if someone hurts me?

Whatever you do!

The characters are not real, so the character's actions don't matter at all. When I identify myself as a character, of course I don't allow myself to get hurt, and of course I don't allow what I have to be destroyed.

But what do I do when I know that I have nothing to do with the character of Yuan Changwen?

The answer is, you can do anything. You can go against the current and do some behaviors that the characters like. You can go downstream, maybe the character doesn't like it or maybe the character likes it, who knows?

This kind of uncertain answer, the character is very annoying, and a reasonable and definite answer must be found. However, I can't, no one can. If I agree with a definite pattern of behavior, then I am just enriching the character and has nothing to do with reality.

So, is the so-called behavior along with the flow of life a behavior pattern? Of course, why not, it is also a full-fledged role.

Because, the characters themselves are not real, so no matter how much I care about the characters, they are all turning around in the mud of unreality.

There is no advance at all.

It's a normal phenomenon, for so many years, I have always identified myself with the role of Yuan Changwen. How can you get rid of the character in an instant? Ignore everything about the character in an instant?

It takes time and effort.

Anyone who claims to get rid of the role in an instant is. If it can be done, how many people in the world have gotten rid of their roles? Even if it's once a year, even if it's every ten years, then it should at least be made into a promotional video.

But in fact, the whole empire, I have not seen such a propaganda film.

The good is like water, this is just a metaphor. There is no such thing as "goodness" at all, just a contrast between a kind of "hypocrisy". Artificially distorted kindness is "hypocrisy", because it is simply the kindness distorted by a large group of people for the sake of life and social stability.

Judge certain things and certain behaviors as good, so everyone tacitly does not discuss these things, and just admits to using them directly. However, with human beings, with artificial distortions, there will be the kindness of these bullshit.

It can be said that kindness leads human civilization forward, kindness is the foundation of human civilization, and it is precisely because of kindness that we human beings are free from ignorance...... No matter how much you whitewash, you can't change the fact that kindness is just artificially distorted.

Like water, it simply flows along the terrain and can nourish all things and destroy them at the same time. This is called goodness, this is "true goodness". But if there is no distinction between everything, then what kindness is there to talk about?

So, there is no real goodness at all. The so-called goodness only exists in the characters, and it is just an artificially distorted concept. Like water, if you don't discern, you are good. Then, if you don't distinguish between good and evil, you won't think about good and evil, and these words will naturally disappear.

Without the intervention of the twist in the mind, everything will return to nature. Naturally, it does not mean normal, because normal is defined by the majority of people in society, and it is called normal like most people. But the word "nature" is clearly not artificially distorted.

Therefore, a lightning bolt can burn down a large area of forest, a sudden climate change can exterminate tens of thousands of creatures, you can hunt wantonly, you can raise offspring, you can eat your companions, you can work together, you can be alone.

Then, after touching the real slashing character, I can also do good things and do bad things. Actions are not chosen by morality, nor are the futures weighed by distortions in the mind. I do this because that's all I can do.

Wrong.

I'm imagining what will happen after the killing, really, what's the point of thinking about these things? Do I have to convince people to believe me? Or do I have to be logical and meticulous in preparing to publish a book, answering all the questions that may arise?

Shit!

It's a good idea to distract me and give up on slashing and moving forward. That's where you study the signposts and preach the way forward based on your own speculation.

If you want to know what's going on next, just go over by yourself.

It's like being reluctant to throw away the signs, reluctant to move forward, and having a deep attachment to the dirt beneath your feet. So, there was no advance at all.

Further.

It's a powerful word, and I'm not done yet, so keep going.

Why should I guess how far I am from the mountain? Why should I compare other people's maps?

If you decide to keep going, why bother to know the exact time, why bother to have that sense of control?

Who's in control?

Role.

In fact, the character has always wanted to be in control, and it seems that he must be in control. If I don't control and let events develop on their own, then where does the character go? Without the distortion of the role, without the self-definition of the character, then it doesn't seem to make much difference whether the character exists or not.

Like, waiting for friends to come over for a party. It doesn't matter if he's an hour later, or two hours later, we'll be waiting here. In that case, why call him to ask about his itinerary, as if he had to know the time of the other party's arrival.

It doesn't matter, I already know the gist of it, at least I know what I'm trying to say.