Personal interests, it seems, cannot escape this.

I didn't expect to be holding on to this thing.

It's not complicated personal interests, nor does it refer to personal interests such as money status.

Rather, it is the simplest personal gain, physical harm.

When someone hits me, I naturally want to fight back, and I don't allow anyone to hit me, I don't allow this to happen.

When I was a child, it seemed that physical injury was the main contradiction.

The bullying of friends around you and your own counterattack can ensure that you will not continue to be bullied next time.

Even if you don't fight back, you will fantasize about a vengeful victory in your heart.

This feeling is very pleasant, if someone hits me, then I will fight back, even if I am covered in bruises, but I will never give in, it is a big deal to keep fighting.

It's hard to refute, if someone beats me, won't I fight back and let the other party bully me?

Growing up, it seemed that this kind of violence rarely happened around me.

Even if it is bullied by a colleague, it will not directly hit the body.

I feel a sense of happiness in my heart, that is, I am fortunate that I did not directly attack the flesh, is this a sign of fear?

There is no need to discuss how adults hit each other, how they hit each other mentally and personally.

There is no need to discuss the direct physical injuries between children, and why they are transformed when they grow up.

The point is, I'm still holding on to these falsehoods, and I don't dare to let these things happen.

That's what I need to kill, and it's clear and clear that I'm just grasping the self-definition, that is, fleshing out the character.

There is no need to discuss what I have to do after I let go, in case I am bullied and beaten by others, I won't fight back.

This kind of thinking is false in itself, and it is itself an emotional pull.

It's just that I didn't see it before, and I didn't think I would still hold on to it.

It seems that he is very skilled in slashing, and he doesn't need to care about anything more.

I firmly grasped that "I can't be bullied and beaten by others, and I can't not fight back when I am bullied and beaten", and the emotional pull is obvious.

Yes, it seems silly, but the key point is to stand short and tug at the heart, the grip like an anchor.

Others, there is no need to discuss and negotiate at all.

Neither "must fight back" nor "must not fight back", but simply discard the whole problem and cut off the grasp of that emotion.

This state is the same as the previous panic about the future of money, in case something happens, how terrifying.

Make plans and set rules around these distortions so that when you actually get into them, you can use them to deal with them.

The whole thing is not fundamentally different from the metaphor of "diarrhea".

It's all emotional pulling, so we will skip this just assumption and directly assume that these things can really happen.

I'm not saying it's a good thing to have someone hit me.

Either side of the binary opposition is, and I don't have any reason to grab either side of it.

The question is not "what should I do if someone bullies and beats me?" or "what do I do in that situation to follow the rules I set".

Rather, why ask these questions?

Fear is driven, and whether others agree with it or not, I can clearly feel my own fear and emotions tugging at the issue.

Let me take it as real and let me start the rule setting around "avoiding characters being bullied".

In this situation, should I fight back, or should I let others bully.

The distortion in the mind can be used to list various plans and analyze the effects of each plan.

Then, no matter what the rhetoric is, there is no escaping the distortion in the mind that it is just a prejudice.

Those plans, those analyses, are just wishful thinking.

Such an answer does not solve the problem at all.

However, after the killing, without the pull of emotions, the problem itself no longer exists.

Just like the problem of "diarrhea", what if you really have diarrhea and can't find a toilet without paper, I don't think anyone really plans the storage of paper and the location information of the toilet.

The problem is no longer a problem at all, but I still haven't solved the problem, I just destroy the problem.

In the end, the only answer, perhaps, is simply "I don't know".

There is no fear of "I don't know", just a bland and relaxed "I don't know".

It's not what the characters like, and it's not character worship anymore.

Without knowledge, without planning, it seems that he is living like a fool.

Rhetoric, all kinds of data lists, the head is the analysis of the Tao, and the orderly logic, which is what I used to yearn for.

If people want to not forget their original intentions, then I would have chopped them into pieces a long time ago, stepped on them into slag and discarded them.

Even, I can't understand what the meaning of the original intention is.

If the original intention means the original dream, the kind of dream that is not mixed with fear, simple, one's own preferences, and heart-pounding, why can't you forget it?

Could it be that after everyone has something to beat, there can't be any other heartbeat?

Why can't you forget your original thoughts?

If I interpret the original intention as the original goal, then I don't understand how normal it is to change the goal.

Is there anything wrong with weighing the choice according to the distortion in the mind, so when the distortion in the mind changes, the trade-off also changes?

It seems that not forgetting the original intention is always a humble prayer.

You see, I have never forgotten my original intention, and I have been walking on this path, please let me always be.

It seems to say that if a person often changes his goals, then he will not be able to succeed, and he will not be able to stand at the top of life, because success requires concentration.

This sentence is all an unfounded affirmation.

And, in it, I felt the intense fear very clearly.

Don't give me anything about others, I'm not interested in discussing, that's how it is for me, it doesn't matter at all whether others approve it or not.

The funny thing is that if a person sees a ghost or something and then goes crazy and trembles with fear, such a person will be sent to a mental hospital for treatment.

Tell the man that the ghost is just an illusion because none of us can see it.

And if a person sees a ghost but still remains calm, then this is not mental illness, on the contrary, it has become the envy of everyone's psychic ability or something.

How ridiculous can my world be?

One side blames the other, but both sides are.

I don't care which side I occupy at all, as long as I can flesh out the role, then it's good.

Let me kill myself with my own hands, shatter the characters, and then dissipate between heaven and earth.

The whole universe will dissipate with me.

Because there is no universe at all.

Everything can't survive, no matter what kind of love or kindness it is, it's going to disappear.

There will be no more pulling, no more framing. (https:)

Please remember that the first domain name of this book is:. Mobile version reading URL: