(1)

Through the discussion of the above chapters, we understand why traditional Chinese science has become a mortal science. Pen Fun Pavilion wWw. ｂiquge。 ｉｎfo

Under the advocacy of "Gewu Zhizhi", "study the principles of heaven and understand people", put the material foundation first, and put the spiritual soul behind, but because the Chinese are all atheists and do not agree with the existence of the soul and spirit, therefore, the traditional Chinese theory is only left with the study of "material foundation first", and "spiritual soul behind" has also ceased to exist due to atheism, and only the study of "absolute matter" remains.

Without the spirit and soul of traditional Chinese science, it is natural that "Mingrenlun" is just talking.

It can be seen that Hegel's summary of traditional Chinese theory is correct, and Hegel believes that the "Tao" of traditional Chinese culture is "primitive reason, which produces the universe and dominates the universe, just as the spirit dominates the body." ’”

When the Chinese see that Hegel believes that there is no "philosophy" in China, nine out of ten people will be indignant, unconvinced, and even scolded, because many people do not understand what "primitive reason" is.

Primitive rationality is simply the most primitive understanding of the world by human beings, that is, the initial view of things by human beings, that is, the first understanding that human beings get by looking at the world with their two eyes.

I'll give you an example, if a woman gives birth to a child, when you see a woman give birth to a child, you will get an initial understanding that women have the natural instinct to have children, and when you see that the second and third women will also have children, then you will come to a fixed conclusion, that is, all women will have children, and then you record this phenomenon and make regular conclusions, stubbornly believing that women will have children.

But when you look at the fourth woman who can't have children, you think that this woman is abnormal and breaks the convention, so here you will make a mark, it turns out that there are still women who can't have children, so what kind of women can't have children? Under what circumstances will they not have children? So you look for regularity among 100 people, 1,000 people, 10,000 people, get the parameters of the rules, and then record them for future generations to refer to, so that people in the future can solve similar problems. This is "primitive reason".

Modern human beings have progressed, the times are different, but "primitive rationality" is everywhere, if you want to find a way to treat diseases, you will go to check the regularity of the early life of patients with similar diseases, through many logical concepts of regularity, record the general laws for other doctors to reference.

For example, if you want to build a big plane, how do you build it? This requires us to use "primitive rationality" to solve the problem, find the existing experience records, find the regular documents summarized by our predecessors, and we make a summary to design a large plane based on the experience of others, this method is effective, fast, and can effectively solve practical problems, immediate, fast and efficient, therefore, people will accept this method of thinking convincingly, and gladly apply it to practical action.

This is the reason why "primitive reason" is widely used.

Chinese are the people who are the best at using "primitive rationality", because "Zhou Yi", the main vein of traditional Chinese culture, is the most "primitive rational" and "absolutely material" cultural product. Therefore, the children and grandchildren under the education of "Zhou Yi" are all outstanding applicators of "primitive rationality", and their hearts are full of rational thinking of "absolute matter".

From here you can understand why Chinese are keen on imitation, you can also understand why Chinese like to copy other people's works, all people who hold "primitive rational" thinking, are good at summarizing other people's experience, like to use other people's results, because this is very fast, very effective, and immediate, can achieve the expected goals efficiently and quickly, such a good "rational" thinking method why not use?

Why do you say these things at the beginning of this chapter?

This is still the definition in dialectical philosophy. Many Chinese do not understand why the West has repeatedly claimed that China has no philosophy, and the mention of this issue will arouse the indignation of the Chinese, is there "philosophy" in your culture, and there is no "philosophy" in our culture?

Here we have to ask, what is philosophy?

In the final analysis, "philosophy" is still "the study of human ethical relations", also called "human ethics and wisdom", and it can also be said to be "human love and wisdom".

Why should we define "philosophy" as "the study of human ethical relations" or "the study of human ethics and wisdom", because philosophy is first and foremost anthropology, and it is limited to the study of human "love" and "wisdom". If your knowledge goes beyond that, or if you lack a part of it, then you are not philosophy, you are another kind of learning.

It can be seen that ancient China was a country without philosophical thoughts.

Because traditional Chinese science is a study that places the absolute of matter in the precondition for the development of things, and denies the existence of spirit and soul, in this way, traditional Chinese science is a study that lacks the existence of spirit and soul, and is a study of "absolute matter" and "absolute reason".

Learning, which lacks the spiritual soul, naturally cannot be attributed to the scope of philosophy.

In this way, the problem is very simple, due to the influence of "Zhou Yi", Chinese traditional culture has derived a series of cultural products are "absolute rationality" doctrine, which is naturally inseparable from philosophy. The reason is that there is a lack of "spirit and soul" in the knowledge structure of rational thinking, and nature has nothing to do with "human love and wisdom".

As far as traditional Chinese science is concerned, whether Westerners recognize or disagree with the cultural value of traditional Chinese science, whether they agree with it or not, whether it is philosophy or not, in a word, the emergence of traditional Chinese science has undoubtedly lit a guiding light for ancient China.

The ancients said: "Heaven does not give birth to Zhongni, and eternity is like a long night."

The ancients used this phrase to illustrate that the person who founded the idea of science is like a light in a long night.

Now it seems that this is indeed the case, if there was no Confucius thought in ancient China, the feudal dynasty would have had to explore for a longer time to create the metaphysical superstructure of the feudal dynasty, and this process of exploration will inevitably affect the development of ancient Chinese civilization, and there will be no glorious ancient Chinese civilization for nearly 2,000 years.

On the other hand, Western civilization, "if Socrates is not born in heaven, the West will be like a long night". Because Socrates was the founder of "philosophical" thought, the ancient Greek civilization developed to the point where Socrates began to adjust to a completely new realm of thought, setting up an eternal beacon for Westerners, guiding Westerners to march toward civilized society.

But why has the traditional Chinese science of science reached a dead end after more than 2,000 years? Looking back at the development process of world culture, it is necessary for us to re-understand the modern practicability of ideological methods.

Since the ideological methods of our traditional science have undergone thousands of years of unchanging practical application and played a historical role in China's glorious ancient civilization, why did it come to an end in the end?

In a simple word, the world of "soul" is missing.

When a culture lacks a spiritual soul, this culture is a kind of mechanical culture, orbital culture, closed culture, such a culture has inertia, and it is easy to form a one-sided cultural atmosphere and ideological methods.

The ideological method formed by this cultural atmosphere only focuses on the attention of the event, and does not care about the internal cause changes of the event.

For example, in the above example, everyone has seen that women have the ability to have children, once a woman who can't have children appears, what everyone is concerned about is not why this woman can't have children, but everyone blames this woman's flaws, taboos them, and even kicks them out of the crowd.

This is the simplicity of rational thinking.

At the beginning of the last century, traditional Chinese science and science completed its metaphysical political process, but the rational thinking method has not disappeared, on the contrary, the entire civilized society is widely applying this thinking method, but people cannot clearly identify it as a methodology.

Because rational thinking is inertial thinking, orbital thinking mode, and easy and convenient operation, it is widely used in the crowd.

When a culture is in an "absolute" state, what is missing is necessarily its corresponding material.

Just as when the theory of three views develops to the extreme, the "absolute spirit" occupies all your mental space, then you will inevitably produce a huge strong current of consciousness, begin to fill your entire spiritual world, and march towards a utopian world, life and death, courageously moving forward, not caring about yourself or a material existence at all, a powerful spiritual aura completely fills the body and mind, and fearless personal heroism appears.

In the same way, when you are "absolutely rational" and "absolutely material", you also ignore the spirit and soul, and plunge into fearless heroism in the state of "absolute matter", regardless of life and death, and move forward bravely, but there is one thing that is different from the "absolute spirit", the "absolute spirit" is deduced as individual heroics, and the "absolute rationality" produces collective heroism, which has a strong group character.

However, because "absolute reason" lacks human thinking, "absolute reason" people are ascetics, and selfless dedication is the ideal goal of "absolute reason".

And because the "absolute rational" people are all materialistic beings, the ideal goal of selfless dedication is often just an empty imagination and cannot be achieved at all, which in turn causes the "absolute rational" people to advance to the opposite goal, and eventually forms a corrupt behavior with the purpose of "absolute possession".

Among those who hold "absolute rationality," the phenomenon of corruption is a normal state of affairs, and it is often impossible to eliminate it, because swaying from side to side is the "absolute rational" method of thinking, and it is not surprising that there are problems in the ideological method and the phenomenon of consequences.

If those who hold the "absolute rational" thinking method want to get rid of this dilemma, the only way to get rid of this dilemma is to raise the thinking method to the interface of "knot in five" and accept the checks and balances mechanism of mutual cause and effect, so as to avoid the habitual thinking of swaying left and right.

Because at the interface of "knot in five", there is the world of love, and there is also the principle of triangular pyramid cubes, which is the upper node of "merging in two" and the gathering place of "dividing in three".

Among the ten methodologies, "ending in five" is a summary of "starting from one, combining in two, dividing into three, and becoming in four", and here you can find the above four different thinking methods, which are the sum of the first four methods.

There is a world of "love", a world of reason, a paradise of wisdom, and a fixed pattern of the cycle of the four seasons.

The first thing to understand is what "love" is.

Love is a basic human behavioral response that originates from the psychic induction of the heart. To be precise, when people pay attention to a certain concept, there will be a phenomenon of mental concentration, and the psychological tendency will focus on the development of a certain state of affairs, and pour their hearts into a focal point, forming a dynamic concept of "love".

Since love is enlightened in the heart, there is a soul and spirit in the world of love, and it can also be said that only those who have love can identify with the existence of soul and spirit, and can hold the mind of God.

It can be seen that in the atheist's worldview, love is only a material condition, a mechanism of thinking, and only a solid flesh and blood.

This is the watershed between the primitive rational thinking of human beings and the acquired thinking of human nature, and it is also the dividing line of the degree of human civilization,... Just as the mind dominates the body" belongs to the rationality of the mechanism.

There are ten ways for human beings to understand the world, starting from rational thinking is the thinking method of "starting from one and combining in two", but human beings are thoughtful and thinking, human beings are animals with thinking logic that are higher than other species, and human beings are intelligent animals and animals above animals, so the cognitive structure of human beings cannot be limited to "starting from one and combining in two", but should be "divided into three" The fundamental difference between humans and animals is that people have thoughts, and if they have thoughts, they have a third eye than other animals, which is the reason why humans are human beings, and it is also the starting point, the requirement, and the dividing line.

Therefore, the starting point of human thought should be "divided into three", starting from the world of "love" to start the voyage of human civilization.

Since the starting point of Western philosophy is the world of "divided into three" and "love", you will see that Westerners have clear boundaries in everything, warp and weft, and allude to life.

However, looking at the Chinese along the Yellow River Basin on the other hand, you will find that the people here have very strong blending ideas, everything is confused, you have me, I have you, alluding to the life you see people along the Yellow River Basin like to mix things together, borrowing money does not know how to repay, only borrowing money, no debt repayment thinking, people here are still in the "primitive rationality".

This is the difference between "cooperation" and "division"; in the world view of "cooperation," bureaucracy is very serious and prone to corruption, because in his ideology, the source of wealth is confused, you have me, I have you, this kind of thinking thinks that your wealth is mine, and it is legitimate and reasonable to collect taxes from the people, and this kind of thinking leads to the confusion of officials and businessmen, the government and the people, and the official law, and all things that are mixed up are right and wrong.

However, in the ideological worldview of "separation", rational thinking is not recognized. Western philosophy defines "rational thinking" as the primary stage of human understanding of the world, which belongs to the cognitive structure of natural needs, and belongs to the primitive value orientation, which is the methodology of natural science, and does not rise to the cognitive stage that human nature should reach.

This is where Socrates became great, separating philosophy from the natural sciences, and thus achieving a focus on human learning, which was the starting point of human civilization. Confucius failed to do this, so Confucius's guiding light could only shine more and more dark, and eventually lead mankind astray.

Judging from the standard of Chinese academic vocabulary, many people do not know what "rational thinking" is and what is "human thinking"? Among them, some great intellectuals, professors, and so on have fundamentally different and misunderstood understandings of "rational thinking" and "human thinking"; in fact, what is rational thinking, the scope of definition of rational thinking is only in the way of thinking that puts the material foundation first, puts the spiritual soul last, and denies that the existence of the spiritual soul is conditioned by "absolute matter", that is, the "rational" way of thinking.

On the other hand, "human thinking" is the opposite, which is a way of thinking that puts the spiritual soul first and the material foundation behind. Human thinking identifies the existence of the spiritual soul, and takes the "absolute spirit" as the thinking method, objectively understands the idealistic world, observes the corresponding personnel problems from the perspective of the third person, and uses the third eye to think with the heart, which is the basic method of Western philosophy, and is also the starting point method of "love and wisdom".

Traditional Chinese science is different, traditional Chinese science has not been able to get rid of the shackles of natural science, and denies the existence of spirit and soul, creates the Chinese way of thinking with "absolute material" as the condition, puts material conditions in an absolute pre-monopoly position, and practices the Chinese rational thinking method, which is the fundamental reason why traditional Chinese Confucian culture is going to die, do not fantasize about the revival of traditional Chinese Confucianism, and the culture of death must have its own truth of death.

If the Chinese cannot raise their thinking to the realm of "three views" and still look at the world with two eyes, it will eventually lead not only to cultural backwardness, but also to the progress of civilization.

The Chinese have suffered a lot for rational thinking.

For example, everyone knows that the Chinese "one person is a dragon, three people are a worm", "one monk has water to drink, three monks have no water to drink" and other social and personnel phenomena. For example, there were many heroes like Yue Fei and Wen Tianxiang in ancient China, but you can still see that China is still prolific Wu Sangui and Wang Jingwei traitors, why?

The reason is that the thinking of the Chinese is a rational thinking method, this kind of thinking method is easy to make people go to extremes, it is easy to make people not left and right, and even produce wavering or not left and right behavior, so you will see the result of Yuan Chonghuan from a national hero to Ling Chi's execution, you will also see Hong Xiuquan chanting the idea of equality of the Christian doctrine of "the world is for the public", but practicing the imperial behavior of feudal science, and you will also see Hong Chengquan, How did the so-called Great Confucians such as Zeng Guofan help the lord and kill civilians?

History is like a mirror, and it shines through to reason.

From the historical process, it is not difficult to see that the rational thinking of the Chinese has brought benefits to traditional Chinese civilization, but also made the Chinese suffer deeply. It can be seen from some historical events in ancient China that when a war is about to break out, it is necessary to find a legitimate and reasonable reason to start a war in the name of "justice", or to provoke an incident and start a war in the name of "gods".

An Anshi Rebellion in the Tang Dynasty could lead to thousands of miles of ridges and wilderness in the Central Plains, desolate and almost desolate.

The rebellion of Hong Xiuquan in the Qing Dynasty, from the beginning to the end of the war, caused 400 million Chinese to be sharply reduced to 260 million, creating the world's largest war of self-extermination in history, and the destructive power of the war exceeded that of the First World War and World War II launched by the Europeans, resulting in more deaths due to the war than the sum of World War I and World War II, which is the fruit of the "justice" brought to the Chinese by the meat grinder-style "just" war.

It can be seen from this that the loss of Chinese people eating "rational thinking" can no longer be expressed in words.

In the ideological method of "rational thinking", "reason" is the greatest "benevolence and righteousness", the most important "morality", everything is "reason", because you hold the thinking method of rational thinking, that is, "to talk about things, to theory of reason", to put the material basis in the forefront of the development process of all things, to put "reason" in the front of things and people, "to study the principles of heaven", to theoretical reason, to discuss things, all actions only look at the results, regardless of personnel, "people" are just with the development process of all things and passive operation of "material".

Everyone thinks that this way of thinking is very concise, clear, and very correct and understandable. In fact, otherwise, this kind of thinking method of "studying the principles of heaven and understanding human ethics" is easy to ignore human nature and forget the existence of human ethics.

Therefore, you will see that the ancient Chinese never paid attention to whether it was a civilian residential area or not, and the more popular the residential area, the more tragic the war, and attacking the city was only seizing the initiative in the war, not talking about how many civilians died at all, only looking at the results of the war.

This often leads to countless innocent civilian casualties, and the goal is only to win the war, and only to judge the matter and ignore the person, which is the consequence of the behavior of "judging things by facts, reasoning by reason", so it is not difficult for you to understand the reason why a single civil strife in the "Taiping Heavenly Kingdom" can cause so many deaths.

That's why you can see that the Confucian doctrine of "rationality" has developed to extremes in the Qing Dynasty and the Republic of China, and the social phenomena that have emerged have also shown extreme phenomena.

If you look at history, you will see that at the end of the Qing Dynasty, there were non-governmental organizations such as the "Boxers", which were purely people-oriented organizations, waving the so-called banner of justice and "righteousness and reason", but they were devoted to the imperial power of justice and were committed to fighting for freedom Blindly declaring war on Christian priests, but everyone did not know that this was a war between Eastern and Western cultures, a war of Eastern and Western ideas, which was a momentary courage and was wiped out forever, and eventually led to the demise of the "Boxers" and the death of a large number of innocent civilians.

From here, you can also see that the rebel armies in ancient China had a common problem, on the one hand, they had to fight for freedom, on the other hand, they had to maintain "benevolence, righteousness and morality", and devoted themselves to imperial power.

The development of traditional Chinese feudal science has reached the point where it is impossible to save itself and cannot stop eroding. In the Republic of China, under the influence of the Confucian ideology of "harmony is precious," Wang Jingwei founded the world's largest puppet government with an unprecedented number of people at that time, and the traitors and lackeys created the largest in the world; Jiang Zhongzheng launched a civil war under the slogan of "settling the outside world before securing the interior" to eliminate dissidents, and pushed Chinese feudal science to the extreme.

"Rational thinking" is originally born from the dualistic methodology of "merging in two", and its actual content is a kind of confusing learning, derived from the theory that yin and yang attract, and the core content of this theory is that you have me, I have you, I have you, I do not distinguish between enemies and enemies, and turn enemies into friends, so there is a traitorous argument that the Chinese use strong words and reason.

Therefore, the Chinese must step beyond the dualistic methodology and step into the position of the methodology of "divided into three, formed in four, and tied in five", otherwise it is better not to start a war.

This is because the motive for war can be dualism, and war is a one-way line of life and death, but in terms of strategy, we cannot use dualism, strategic deployment is not a one-way line, and strategy requires a third eye to see the world, especially when war is in a state of chaos, let alone the ideological method of "combining two" to look at problems on the battlefield.

The reason is that rational thinking is a kind of single thinking, orbital thinking, and inertial thinking, and the ideological method develops in one direction, which is very easy to stimulate people's virtual patriotic enthusiasm and so-called national sentiment without warning, resulting in mass indignation, and even boldness, and the destructive force under impulse develops in one direction at a rapid pace, forming an instantaneous brilliant victory, or leading to senseless destruction.

But on the other hand, if you have rational thinking, once you start a war, if you can't summon up all the national emotions in a very short period of time and push patriotic enthusiasm to an empty core space, it will inevitably lead to the leakage of core strength and the power of rebound, which will then trigger the explosion of dualistic thinking anyway, stimulate the power of rebound, trigger the thinking of anyway, and if you don't move forward, you will retreat, causing unimaginable consequences.

This is because rational thinking is a very primitive way of thinking, and strives to achieve the best purpose with the most direct and simple method. This is the initial impulse in the process of human development, once this method of thinking is stimulated, it is a concept of courage, simple and clear to run a straight line to the end, otherwise it is to come over anyway and run to the other extreme.

The ancient Chinese's "primitive rational" thinking method was very strong, so you will see heroes and traitors born only in one thought.

The United States is a new country of immigrants, and its mainstream ideas come from Western philosophy, but this country applies more realism in its thinking and methods, and more rational thinking in methodology, especially in international relations, the United States applies intuitive realism in thinking.

The United States has an intuitive materialist mindset on any matter that has a stake in its own interests, and only puts the maximization of interests in the forefront of looking at things, and "treats things with theory and facts."

But as far as the development of world civilization is concerned, you can't look at all the problems in the world with rational intuitive thinking, the Americans think that the security of the world is closely related to their interests, and everything in the world should be involved, which is the standard primitive rational and realistic way of thinking, using intuitive thinking, looking at the world with two eyes, and intuitive feelings to identify the black and white of the world, this kind of thinking method is also called intuitive pragmatism thinking method.

Americans believe that the world is not perfect, so they want to use their own intuitive thinking to set the world standards that they think are intuitive and reasonable, and to constrain all countries in the world with the standards that they think are intuitive and reasonable. This is completely a rational mode of thinking of "judging things on the basis of facts and reasoning with reason". That is to say, everyone looks at one thing with two eyes, and everyone sees that the surface of things is white, and the inside of things is black, so on the basis of facts, reasoning, since everyone is a concept, then everyone sees a thing "the surface is white, and the inside of things is black" is the standard, this standard is established as a fact, and no one is allowed to change it, if you want to change the established facts, I will drive the aircraft carrier battle group to your doorstep.

That's the terrible thing about primitive reason.

Most Westerners are pragmatists, especially modern Americans, who take intuitive pragmatism to the extreme.

(b),

In this chapter, we will continue to discuss methodology, because the method of thinking is the guiding light of human action, and the way of thinking is the guide to human action.

In today's world culture, "dividing into two" and "combining into three" have been widely used by human beings, and both Westerners and Orientals are widely applying these two methods of thinking.

Whether it is philosophy or science, there is no specific indication of what is dualism and what is three-view theory in its practical application, but people emphasize the ideological methods that they think are correct, which also leads to two completely different behavior patterns, and then forms different political and cultural systems in the East and the West.

Earlier, I mentioned that the methodology of human wisdom in the world is "starting from one, combining in two, becoming four, ending in five, following six, separating from seven, easy to eight, returning to nine, and full of ten". And "starting from one, merging in two, becoming in four, ending in five, easy to eight, and returning to nine" belongs to the materialist's ideological space, while "divided into three, formed in four, knotted in five, conformed to six, separated from seven, easy to eight, and full of ten" is the idealist's consciousness space.

Here we continue to explore the issue of methodology.

We have fully understood the ideological method of "starting from one, merging in two, and dividing into three", but we do not know much about "becoming four", so this chapter focuses on what is the ideological method of "becoming four".

We know that the four seasons of the year are spring, summer, autumn and winter, and the four seasons are distinct, and the climate change of spring, summer, autumn and winter will be reincarnated after a year.

This is the "into four" method of thinking, in the human wisdom of the way of behavior, there is a part of the unchanged mode of thinking, this method of thinking to form a long-term conceptual mechanism, in the process of guiding the development of human civilization reincarnation, long-term application, this method of thinking exists in the "into four" method of thinking.

For example, the legal system, policy measures, religious beliefs, articles of association, etc., which are widely used by human beings, because politics involves sensitive topics, here we still do not talk about the immutable principles of the political system, but only talk about the legal system, policy measures, religious beliefs, and articles of association.

1. Legal system.

Law arises from political goals, is the responsibility and obligation of political goals, legal means is the obligation to maintain political goals, so legal construction is a long-term mechanism that can not be changed at will, once the legal system forms a framework structure is the constant mechanism of the four seasons of reincarnation, once the laws and regulations are formed, they cannot be changed without authorization, legal means are the cornerstone of restricting a small number of violations of laws and regulations among the people, and there are authorizations, orders, and prohibitive restrictive measures in the legal system, which is an extremely serious matter.

The law is a symbol of power, honor, authority, and shelter, and to some extent can be compared to a mother, who is like an umbrella and shelters her children. The mother rebukes her severely, and she chases the unscrupulous son of her children.

The law is like a mother, caring for her children in all seasons, as warm as spring, as warm as summer, as cool as autumn, and as harsh as winter, trying to care for every citizen in her arms.

Therefore, the law cannot be changed at will.

In today's world, the only countries that can maintain legal consistency in the east, west, north and south are the United Kingdom and Japan. In both countries, long-lasting institutions of authority have been maintained for more than a millennium, especially in Japan, where the rule of law under imperial power has been in place for more than 2,000 years.

2. Policy measures.

Policy measures are the government's governance methods, which are directly related to the construction of people's livelihood and are open thinking space, so this is not a place that can be changed without authorization.

The biggest embodiment of policy measures is the method of economic governance, and the function of the government is to realize the political intention of creating, accumulating and distributing wealth, and trying to feed back every citizen under its system, so that every citizen can get the benefits and well-being brought by the wealth effect.

Therefore, the policy should be consistent and should not be easily changed when the economic stop-loss point is not reached.

In today's world, only some countries in Europe have reached the "out of four" standard, such as Germany, Switzerland, etc.

3. Religious beliefs.

Religious belief is the spiritual world of human beings, everyone can believe, faith is a special human behavior, from the inner world of human beings, only human beings have such psychological literacy, as well as psychological appeals.

Religious belief is a psychological reaction reflected in cultural life by the special social consciousness of human beings, and has universal cultural characteristics.

Religious belief comes from the psychological appeal of human beings, and there are two types of theistic beliefs and atheistic beliefs.

As far as religious belief is concerned, religious belief is the telepathy produced after the cognitive structure of human beings reaches a certain level, and religious belief must not be regarded as a superstitious activity, religious belief has nothing to do with superstitious activities, religious belief reflects the third eye in the perception of the world after human civilization reaches a certain level, and religious belief is the spiritual and spiritual world produced after human beings have crossed the two eyes to see the world and entered the world with three views.

Therefore, it is not difficult to understand that when your worldview is still looking at the world with two eyes, you can only see reality with your two eyes, and you cannot have a third eye to perceive the world, because there are red, orange, yellow, green, blue, blue, and purple, and there are seven emotions: joy, anger, worry, thought, sorrow, fear, and shock, and the six desires: eyes, ears, nose, tongue, body, and mind.

There can be no theism in both eyes, this is an important embodiment of human progress, only when you feel the existence of spirit and soul, can your world view reach a new height, in order to step up to a new and higher level, this is the gap between human civilization, the gap between human civilization is here.

This is the gap between Eastern and Western cultures, and from this point of view, if you can't raise your consciousness, you can't reach a whole new level of ideology, and you can't comprehend the true meaning of philosophy.

From here we also see the height of the atheist's thinking.

Religious belief is chicken soup for the soul, which can only be consistently advocated and cannot be changed at will.

This kind of thinking and behavior can only be seen in theists, atheists will not have a long-term mentality, the world of atheists is a world of thousands of purples and thousands of reds, often changing, the last term will be changed, the next term will continue to change, and people will not understand it and still continue to change, because "man will conquer heaven".

Fourth, the articles of association.

In countries where the economic system is the dominant mechanism, the articles of association of the company are the construction of a long-term mechanism, and the principle of consistency is an important part of the articles of association. The reason is simple, the economy is an open space for development, and "living" in this space is the core value, but not the core concept.

The core concept of the economic system is embodied in the long-term unchanged articles of association, which must adhere to the principle of consistency, and the established articles of association cannot be changed at will.

This is evident in the UK and Japan.

The British are the inventors of the modern economic system, and their ideas are derived from "divided into three", but achieved by "made into four".

In the UK and Japan, you will find companies with flexible economic strategies, but they are a long-term mechanism of the cycle of the four seasons, companies adhere to the principle of consistency, do not change the articles of association at will, and have strong trade unions to protect the individual rights and interests of workers for one purpose.

You can't see this way of thinking in countries that have not entered the world, such as some countries in Africa, where the articles of association can be changed at will, and they are changing every day, and you have not seen a perfect articles of association.

The articles of association of the company are the cornerstone of the principle of ensuring the consistency of economic strategy, and changing them at will is like removing the foundation bricks.

In Japan, family-owned enterprises are very common, can be passed down for hundreds of years, through countless generations of inheritance of the true nature of the same, and the Japanese do not arbitrarily fire employees, the stability of the workforce is very strong, the position of employees can be inherited, which shows a problem, flexible employment system does not necessarily stimulate the enthusiasm of employees, but the opposite, because you are uncertain to change the nature of the employee's work, will inevitably affect their sense of presence in the enterprise.

It is also a common phenomenon in China that there are no more than three generations of wealth, the reason is simply that under the company system without the principle of consistency, no one wants to maintain a stable mentality to do things, and they may be fired by the leader anytime and anywhere, who will be loyal to their career?

Therefore, reform can only be limited, not endless.

This is the truth that when human wisdom reaches the height of "becoming four", stability is the cornerstone of the development of civilization.

Only when everything is in a stable state and the principle of consistency is maintained in everything can society develop greatly and human civilization reach a new height.

Only in order to develop people's careers can they succeed, reach the other side of victory, and achieve a better life.

;