Chinese really need to comprehensively study Hegel's philosophical thought, comprehensively implement Hegel's "rational kernel" thought in all fields of society, let everyone understand what is "rational kernel", gradually eliminate the influence of Confucian "heaven theory" thought on people, eliminate the influence of submissive thinking on Chinese, if Chinese do not fundamentally change this kind of thinking, sooner or later one day China's civil strife will occur, the reason is very simple, when you use "heaven theory" When you look at the world, you will have the mentality of adapting to events, and the idea of going against the grain will naturally arise, and there will be no immediate solution to the problem, immediate handling of contradictions, and the resulting consequence is the development of the backlog of events, dealing with problems with a negative attitude, not actively looking for solutions to problems, but objectively causing the deepening of grievances, and eventually leading to the outbreak of conflicts. Pen % fun % Pavilion www.biquge.info

On the contrary, Hegel's idea of the "kernel of reason" is the opposite, Hegel believes that what exists is reasonable, and what is reasonable is realistic. When you recognize this step, you will start from reality and treat the problem with a positive attitude, and you will actively look for the best solution to solve the problem, resolve the conflict, and eliminate the conflict that may arise. This is the true philosophical view of the "kernel of reason".

Moreover, Hegel's thought is an understanding of realpolitik, from the depths of the mind to understand that politics can bring benefits to the people, people should pay attention to realization, do not complain about reality for no reason, since reality exists, it has a reason for its existence, and existence is legitimate and reasonable. According to Hegel, everything is defective, and if there is a defect, it needs to be improved gradually, and that only the whole exists, and everything else is incomplete. Incompleteness can be changed, and it can be improved with an open mind so that it will ultimately benefit the people. Instead of accusing, striking, or even opposing, striking at what already exists. It's not a resignation that swallows anger and compromises. Rather, it is to actively transform others with a positive mindset, so that they conform to the wishes of the people, and ultimately seek well-being for the people. Hegel's ideas have had a profound impact on modern Westerners, who have a much more mature understanding of politics than Chinese.

The Chinese's idea of conforming to heavenly principles will only increase contradictions, intensify problems, accumulate resentment, and eventually when resentment accumulates to a certain point, it will only usher in fierce conflicts.

This is the fundamental reason why the internal contradictions of the people of the ancient Chinese dynasties could not be shaken off and eliminated, and eventually led to the rapid change of dynasties. This is also the fundamental reason why traditional Chinese science cannot meet the requirements of the superstructure, and finally has to choose to give up.

According to Hegel, when being is strengthened to pure "being", the concept of existence is abstracted, and the extremes of things must be opposed, and when "being" is excessive, the concept of nothingness is formed in turn. His thinking is very close to the theory of traditional Chinese philosophy that "yang is still yin, and yin is anti-yang", but the Chinese understand better than anyone that real practical action is the fat man of theory and the short man of action.

In fact, in the process of the development of things, we really can't "study the principles of heaven", but can only "study the principles of tomorrow", the so-called "study of the principles of heaven" is to do everything possible to discover and find the natural laws of the development of things, to obtain the laws of the development of things, in order to better obey the laws of heaven and earth, and put all "existence" on a given track, then when the existence of things is developed to the extreme, it can only be the consequence of the extreme of things, and when existence develops to purity, it can only be"Existence" is subverted, but it is a kind of nihilistic ending, not to mention "Ming Ren Ethics", which is the natural rules and moral standards of human existence.

If a person does things and excessively pursues the perfect result of one aspect, he will inevitably lose the corresponding existence of other aspects, and there will be gains and losses. In the same way, when philosophy pursues rules and standards excessively, there will inevitably be a lack of human ethics.

This is the fundamental reason why Chinese science is finally dying, when philosophical thought puts the rules and systems and compulsory management in the first place, human ethics must be secondary. In the same way, when philosophy puts human ethics first, rules, heavenly principles, and material conditions must be secondary. When all behaviors are based on human ethics, heavenly principles, rules, systems, politics, laws, and so on will develop around human nature, which is more in line with the natural laws of human development. This is also the fundamental reason for the expansion of Western philosophy to the world.

Parmenides believes that all true knowledge must exist as "being" or "being", not as the object of "nothingness" or "non-existence". From the beginning of Western philosophy, the "existence" or "existence" of things has been put in the first place in philosophical debate, and only in terms of existence and non-existence, yes or no, existence or non-existence, existence and nothingness, it is very intuitive and clear, this is because their philosophical principle is the principle that one plus one equals two, one plus one can be added or divided, and together it equals two, and it is still one when separated. For example, when fighting a war, Westerners fight wars, fight if they win, run if they can't win, run as fast as possible, keep the "existence" of life is the biggest royal road, very direct, with a very heavy subjective will to dominate the development of the psychology of the situation, which is also in line with the ideological principles of the soldiers, China's soldiers and legalists have a very strong idealistic spirit, and put the "human plan" of "planning things in the sky" in the first place in the development of things, and naturally "succeeding things" It is ranked in the second nature, when you put people in the first place, the material conditions are the external conditions that revolve around the personnel movement, which forms a very reasonable personnel arrangement, which is more conducive to discovering the regularity of the development of things, more convenient for people to plan, more convenient for human wisdom to play, to achieve people's wishes, and finally to achieve a successful ending.

In his essay "To Exist or Not to Exist, It's a Question," Anhemon writes: "Christian theology is fundamentally averse to nihilistic nonsense. God is pure "being" or being. There is no void, emptiness, void, crevice, crevice in him. This can be said to be the swan song of Western Christianity. Maimonides lists five negative ways to discuss the "nature" of God, but not to discuss the nihilism of God's existentialism. This shows how Western philosophy views existence and nothingness.

And when Chinese look at existence and non-existence, yes or no, change and immutability, reason and soul, materialism and idealism, they are mixed and contracted. The philosophy of the Chinese is a dialectic of one-two-for-two, two-two-for-four. The ideological source of Chinese philosophy is the principle of multiplication, as long as you open the thought program, the result you get is the result of multiplication of one or two gets two, two two gets four, multiplication is the fundamental cause of the complexity of Chinese thought, and looking at the problem from the point of view of opposition and unity is naturally a confused result. For example, in war, the Chinese fight a war to win and fight, fight even if they can't win, and fight together in a melee, and the Chinese are not afraid of sacrifice when fighting a war, and have no concept of preserving their lives, and the fundamental reason for this is that the Chinese regard the problem as "Tianli" first, and "human ethics" second, when you put Tianli in the first place, the natural human thinking will be weak, and the concept of victory and defeat will be serious. The ideological concept held by the Chinese is actually the materialist spirit that matter is the first nature and consciousness is the second nature.

Another example is dealing with contradictions, and the Chinese have a mantra: "Reason is not to others." In China, whether it is officials, judges, or ordinary people, this kind of thinking is widespread, and when dealing with contradictions and conflicts, they adopt the attitude of "reason" to explain reason, to deal with problems with the attitude of "reason" first and then others, and to put "reason" in the first place and "people" in the second nature.

For example, in the case of robbery, the common method adopted by the Chinese is to resist, to judge the matter, to deal with the incident first, and then to consider personal safety, but also to put the incident itself in the first nature, put people in the second nature, so that the consequences of considering things are often to put their own lives in danger.

Westerners, on the other hand, think of saving their lives first when they encounter danger, putting people first, and then thinking about the development of events. The same is true for Westerners in war, if they can't win and get into trouble, they don't feel ashamed to be a prisoner of war, and saving their lives comes first. This tells us the truth that when there are no more people, there is really nothing left.

Westerners also put people before others in dealing with contradictions and conflicts, put people at the front end of dealing with things, put things second, and put people first. When dealing with problems, the first thing that comes to mind is who started the conflict first, regardless of the cause of the incident, only talk about the party that provoked the incident, regardless of the causes and consequences of the incident, deal with the person who provoked the incident first, and then launch an investigation into the incident itself.

In fact, the original intention of philosophy should be like this, everyone should have this kind of thought, in life should put "personnel" before the "director", starting from "people", put human nature at the front end of the development of all things, people-oriented, people before reason, focus on the development of things with human love, use human wisdom to deal with problems, solve contradictions, this is the real philosophy, because if there is no one in this world, it is all in vain, empty words,, where does the world without people come from?

What is philosophy? This is philosophy, and philosophy is all around you and me, which directly affects people's minds and guides people's actions.

This is the difference between Eastern and Western cultures, rooted in the fact that the essence of theoretical frameworks is different, and different ideas will inevitably produce different results.

The simple and clear thinking of the Chinese only appeared in the ideas of the Legalists and the soldiers, but it did not last long, and after the Qin people unified the six countries, the Qin Dynasty and Hanxing ceased to exist.

Before the unification of the Six Kingdoms by the Qin State, most of the administrative methods of the Qin State came from the Legalists and the soldiers, and the ideas of the Legalists and the soldiers were concise and clear, straightforward and clear, and there were direct and appropriate ideological methods. This is the reason why the countries of Chu, Chen, Cai, Lu, and Qi were influenced by the I Ching, and their thinking methods mostly used the multiplication principle of the I Ching.

This shows a truth, that is, in the early days of the founding of the People's Republic of China, the simpler the thinking method, the better, and the complexity of thinking was not conducive to the decision-makers' decision-making. History has shown that a concise and clear way of thinking is more widely accepted.

In the original meaning of philosophy, the development of things is the existence and non-existence of problems, and it is very clear and clear to look at the problem in this way. For example, when you see an object in front of you, your first reaction is that the object exists, right in front of you.

Whether it is superficially or intuitively perceived, this object exists and does not change, so this object has nothing to do with non-existence.

We only need to look at the problem in terms of the existing problem, so that the non-existent problem exists, because the object exists, and it has nothing to do with the non-existence, so why should we pay attention to the non-existent problem?

Why do we complicate the problem, and why do we have to think about changes in the internal structure of matter when the external conditions do not change?

Are we overthinking?

From the point of view of the triumph of wisdom over self, it is easier to solve problems by looking at the process of development intuitively than by understanding the process of development, so in the eyes of Westerners, the legal system is the cornerstone of ensuring that everyone has the opportunity to receive equal protection.

Westerners attach importance to the effectiveness of legal means, but do not care about the internal factors of lawbreakers, and will not have the thinking of "confessing leniently and resisting strictly". Because in the philosophy of Westerners, there is no ideology of you and me, I have you, turning enemies into friends, probation and education, and so on.

Western philosophy only looks at existence and non-existence, existence and non-existence, white and black, and Popper's (Austrian philosopher's) falsification principle says that a black swan is enough to overturn the assertion that "no swan is black". For crimes, Westerners only look at the "presumption of guilt" and do not look at the "inference of innocence", guilt is guilt, innocence is innocence, and do not talk about the cause and effect.

This is the way Westerners look at the problem of "existence and non-existence", simplifying, intuitive, and seeking truth from facts, this is Western philosophy.

;