Chapter 22: The Moral and Philosophical Rules of Science

The word "morality" comes from traditional Chinese science, and its basic meaning is that the Tao is natural, follow nature, and all personnel behaviors do not violate the laws of nature, conform to the laws of nature, and belong to the ideological proposition of "Heavenly Dao and Personnel", and morality is not a responsibility and obligation, and does not need to be obeyed by everyone. Pen, fun, pavilion www. biquge。 info

The "rules" of Western philosophy are just the opposite of the "morality" of traditional Chinese science, the rules come from the love and wisdom of human beings, through the objective idealistic thinking of human beings, with "man is the measure of all things" to formulate rules and regulations or industry regulations for everyone to abide by, the rules follow the ideological proposition of "the way of human beings", respect the natural laws formed by human beings, abide by the conventions of human beings, rules are responsibilities and obligations, and everyone must abide by them.

It can be seen that morality and rules are two different things, and there is an essential difference.

From the origin of morality and rules, we can understand the essential difference between traditional Chinese science and Western philosophy, which attaches importance to "heavenly principles" and follows the so-called natural morality, while Western philosophy attaches importance to "man is the measure of all things", takes human existence as a prerequisite, and advocates the use of human love and wisdom to formulate rules and regulations or industry standards suitable for human beings to abide by.

At this point, the Chinese lack "man is the measure of all things", the reason is that the Chinese follow the Confucian method of thinking of the innate descendants of "knowledge of things", that is, what Hegel called "primitive reason", and the Chinese do not believe in God.

Westerners often stand at the height of "love and wisdom", follow the supremacy of the soul and the supremacy of the human heart, handle personnel with the objective idealistic mentality of "existence is reasonable", resolve contradictions, and formulate rules and regulations or industry norms suitable for human beings to abide by, which is the wisdom of Western philosophy, and it is also the fundamental reason why world civilization is moving closer to philosophy.

As far as morality and rules are concerned, they should all fall under the category of summary cognition made by human beings with wisdom, and the key point is only on "Heavenly Personnel" or "Heavenly Human Nature", which is the crux of the issue.

Guided by philosophical thoughts, Westerners attach great importance to the "natural way of personnel", and take "man is the measure of all things" as the starting point, and often consider the "existence" of "people" first in formulating industry rules and legal systems, and look at the problem from an objective point of view, fully understand the ideological proposition that "existence is reasonable", and formulate industry rules, in order to achieve a personnel system and legal standards that everyone can adapt to and have standards.

However, due to the influence of traditional Chinese Confucianism, Chinese everywhere "learn from things", pursue the laws of nature, seek the principle of things, take the way of heaven and personnel as the criterion of life, and often first consider the natural "virtue" of "Tao" in the formulation of industry rules and legal systems, follow the natural law of going with the flow and things are not people, ignoring the principled principle that talents are the masters of this world, and looking at the world from an intuitive point of view. The mandatory formulation of industry standards or legal systems does not care about the adaptability of all people, but only takes the principle of things as the criterion. The result of this is often only to the thing and not to the person, and everyone must implement it if they are convinced or not.

Let's think about whether this is the reason, many people in daily life can encounter inappropriate industry standards or legal standards, but no one can change the reality of existence, the final result is to "endure" things, with the natural development, such a way of thinking is often the contradiction is not resolved, but the grievances are knotted, and finally accumulate into greater contradictions.

Why did the uprising movement in ancient China have all dynasties, and the uprising movement has become the root cause of frequent changes of dynasties, the Chinese understand very well the truth that water can carry a boat and overturn a boat, but they do not understand the "human nature" of "the rationality of existence itself", and use "man is the measure of all things" To formulate industry standards for all walks of life, so that everyone knows that there is a third eye with an objective angle behind you, and under the standard that everyone can adapt to, standardize everyone's personnel behavior, resolve contradictions, and solve problems, which is also the reason why there have been few people's internal uprising movements in Western countries since ancient times.

It is an indisputable fact that the method of thinking determines the fate of mankind, and without the correct method of thinking, it is impossible for you to formulate a legal system or industry norms that are appropriate for everyone to abide by.

The legal system or industry norms are the standards for regulating personnel behavior, resolving contradictions, and solving problems, and it is also the fundamental reason why human beings need philosophical ideas to guide them forward.

As far as the meaning of "morality" in traditional Chinese science and the meaning of "rules" in Western philosophy are concerned, the "morality" of traditional Chinese science is not a legal system or industry standard, nor is it a correct standard for regulating personnel behavior, resolving contradictions, and solving problems. Chinese should clearly understand that morality is a natural law, not a personnel standard, morality is not a responsibility and obligation, and it does not need to be observed by everyone, and the ideological method that does not need to be observed by everyone cannot be used to measure personnel behavior in everything. The "rules" in the sense of Western philosophy are indeed the correct standards for regulating personnel behavior, resolving contradictions, and solving problems, and are the legal system or industry norms, and the responsibilities and obligations that everyone must abide by.

;