Chapter 23 The division of Chinese and Western cultural open source ideas is more important than the division between civilization and barbarism

Why is it more important to distinguish the ideological sources of Chinese and Western cultures than to distinguish between civilization and barbarism? Because civilization and barbarism come from the foundation of ideological methods, and the basic point of ideological methods is precisely the source of power that determines human civilization and barbarism. Pen × fun × Pavilion www. ｂｉｑｕｇｅ。 ｉｎｆｏ

Whether a group of people are civilized or barbaric in their behavior has a fundamental relationship with their cultural cultivation, that is to say, the ideological methods practiced by a nation and a group of people are the fundamental factors that determine the civilization and barbarism of the behavior of this group. Therefore, it is much more important to divide the open source ideas of Chinese and Western cultures than to divide civilization and barbarism, and the open source ideas determine the direction of action of a group of people, a nation, and a country.

Both traditional Chinese science and Western philosophy are the study of the method of human thought, and the study that guides the direction of human behavior, and the method of human thought determines the standard of human behavior and the guide to action, and is the standard of the direction of human action.

Therefore, the basis of the ideological method determines the starting point of the standard of behavior and the guide to action, and this starting point is an important criterion for dividing human behavior between civilization and barbarism, which shows that the open source of Chinese and Western cultural ideas is much more important than the division between civilization and barbarism, and civilization and barbarism cannot determine ideology, but ideology is the benchmark of human civilization and barbarism.

Recently, I saw a conversation between Cui Yongyuan and Yi Zhongtian, to the effect that Cui Yongyuan asked: The academic community has many views on the "Hundred Schools" Forum, what are your opinions?, Yi Zhongtian replied: "Hundred Schools" is a program for the audience, the program has not been open for a long time, and there is no experience, so we can only cross the river by touching the stones, and touch them while walking, but we finally touched the stones, we crossed the river, if we don't touch it, we can't even cross the river, and some people don't even cross the river.

This statement sounded very reasonable, so the audience gave a warm applause and agreed with him. In fact, it is not, but from this paragraph we can see that Chinese generally have this kind of thinking, which also reflects the starting point of the cultural foundation determines the reason for the ideological method, in fact, this is the weakness of traditional Chinese science, which is the criticism of traditional Chinese culture.

If the Chinese's principles and ideas are simple, barbaric, extensive, and orbital development, there will definitely be people who cannot stand up against the Chinese, but if you carefully study the deep meaning of this paragraph, you will find that this is the ideological method used at the beginning of human civilization, which is very primitive, and Hegel said that this is "primitive reason". Is this method of thinking correct? Correct? In the early stage of human development, human civilization is like a blank sheet of paper, and there is no experience to follow, so it is necessary to use the primitive rational thinking method of crossing the river by feeling the stones to solve problems, accumulate experience, and resolve contradictions. But when human civilization has developed to this day, is it a bit backward to still use primitive rational thinking methods?

Attributing traditional Chinese rational doctrine to the barbaric primitive rational civilization and to the initial stage of human thinking and methods will certainly arouse the anger of countless Chinese, but if you look back, since the 19th century, countless outstanding Chinese pioneers have thrown their heads and shed their blood for what? Just to smash the old world? In order to find a completely new way of thinking to guide the Chinese forward.

When human civilization has developed to today's height, is it still backward to go back and use the outdated thinking methods?

So what is the correct method of thinking of civilization? This correct method of thinking is exactly what Yi Zhongtian later said that he could not do, and what he roughly means is: There are no rules to follow in the "Hundred Schools of Lectures," so we cannot set boundaries, rules, and regulations, and systems. This sentence sounds very reasonable, it seems that everything should be done like this, and new things should not set boundaries, set rules and regulations, and set rules and systems. If there is no experience to follow, we should cross the river by feeling the stones, without setting boundaries, and let them develop. This is also the common thinking of the Chinese, and it is also the ideological method of traditional Chinese science.

But Western philosophy does not see it that way, and Western philosophy has another point of view. Because the ideological foundation of Western philosophy is rooted in the ideological method of the objective idealistic world, most people who hold philosophical ideas will hold that all new things should be fully investigated before they are produced, set boundaries, set rules and regulations, set strict rules and regulations, set up risk and accident plans, and make full preparations before the event occurs。

If the "8.12" incident in Tianjin Port had set boundaries, set up rules and regulations, set up strict rules and regulations, set up risk and accident plans, and had made adequate plans before the accident, would such a big accident still occur, causing such huge casualties and material losses?

Therefore, it is said that the traditional Chinese Confucian doctrine has inferior roots, and belongs to the backward and barbaric ideological methods that must be abandoned in human thinking methods, and it is not the time for the Chinese to look back, and the ideological methods that the Chinese should really learn and master are still the ideological methods in Western philosophy, and the Chinese cannot forever maintain the "primitive rational" ideological methods of "crossing the river by feeling the stones", but should turn to "love and wisdom" The realm of consciousness takes a step forward, has and applies more civilized thinking methods, so that everything has a latitude and longitude, and everything has a clear boundary, sets strict rules and regulations, sets strict rules and regulations, has a sense of risk, sets up efficient and high-quality programs, and allows things to move forward correctly and safely, set up risk and accident plans, and use "love and wisdom" to formulate the most reasonable rules and regulations suitable for everyone to abide by.

Use the objective mentality of "existence is reasonable" to deal with problems, resolve contradictions, resolve major and minor situations in daily life, achieve crisis events in the embryonic stage, eliminate the Chinese go with the flow, "cross the river by feeling the stones", and improve the cultural literacy of the Chinese as a whole, which is the more important reason for dividing the open source thinking of Chinese and Western cultures than dividing civilization and barbarism.

Chinese believe in the concept of "morality", but morality is a naturally formed law and is not binding, and the strength of a person's moral concept is only related to his personal cultivation and cannot be restrictive. However, the rules are the rules and regulations and legal standards formulated by human beings with "love and wisdom", and they are the responsibilities and obligations of the whole society, so everyone must abide by the rules and regulations and legal standards.

It can be seen that it is time for the Chinese to abandon the concept of morality and strengthen the system of rules, only the system of rules is strengthened to all walks of life, so that there are rules for conduct, there are standards for everything, and everyone has a concept in their hearts, abide by discipline and law, and do not exceed boundaries. Do everything clearly, the rules have a degree, the length is based on, with "love and wisdom" to develop the most reasonable rules and regulations suitable for everyone to abide by, so that everyone knows that there is a third eye behind their eyes, whether metaphysical or metaphysical must be done longitude and latitude, ethics must be there. And the starting point of doing all this is the open source method of dividing Chinese and Western cultural thoughts, and it is more important to divide the boundary between civilization and barbarism, without the correct way of thinking, it is impossible to make the correct behavior mode, which is the foundation of the development of things.

Due to the influence of traditional Chinese Confucian concepts, the Chinese have everything in a tumbling way, without borders, with confusion between politics and law, and without clear and definite political standards and industry standards. The industry standard is low, and the starting point for market access is not high. So even foreigners have seen this, and everything that involves the Chinese market can be treated in a chaotic way and in another way. For example, South Korea's Samsung mobile phone recruitment plan can not include Chinese consumers, what is the reason? The reason is that China does not have strict industry standards, the industry standards are not clear, the standards are long, multi-management, confusion, there is no strict and reasonable, everyone must abide by the unified standards, and in the end, no one is well managed to no one, let it develop.

;