Western philosophy is more about distinguishing right from wrong, while Chinese philosophy, influenced by the Book of Changes, focuses on dialectical unity, complicating the originally intuitive things, and using dialectical thinking to look at problems, and the results are also complex and diverse. Pen, fun, pavilion www. biquge。 info

Therefore, the definition of Western philosophy is very vague, broad, and open, but it is very simple and clear in distinguishing between right and wrong, and it singularly points out the relationship between existence and non-existence, and does not involve too much scope. Under the influence of the Book of Changes, Chinese philosophy has a very clear and narrow definition, only looking at the problem in terms of the yin and yang contract, the unity of heaven and man, and complicating the original single issue. Because there is no boundary between contract and unity, no matter what it is, as long as you dialectically analyze the law of the development of things, this thing will be complicated. The reason is that the contract between you and me will inevitably produce the consequences of you having me and me having you, and the dialectic is also the result of you and me and the enemy and me in the end.

The definition of Western philosophy is very vague, defining the process of the development of things between love and wisdom, looking for the scientific laws and principles of the development of things. In the process of practicing the development of things, this method of thinking is very broad and open. However, when Westerners study core values with love and wisdom, they have a very simple understanding, looking at the problem in terms of one plus one equals two. Only look at things in terms of the existence and non-existence of things, the human body and the soul.

When you watch blockbusters shot by Westerners, no matter how lengthy the film is, the content of the film only looks at the problem of good and evil, and the core dialectical thinking never deviates from the Westerners' consideration of the existence and non-existence of the development of things, which is the core values of Westerners, which are straightforward and clear.

The Chinese, due to the influence of the I Ching, have a clear and definite definition in philosophy and thought. Only look at the problem in one, two, two, two, and four, and open your eyes to take the image, you must look for the cause of the problem on the basis of the yin and yang contract, and the unity of heaven and man, and practice the change process of the development of things.

The entrance to Chinese philosophy is very narrow and singular, but when it comes to studying problems in a way of thinking, it is very complex, very broad, and very vague.

It is precisely because of the influence of the I Ching principle that the Chinese, under the influence of the principle of one-dimensional repetition, binary, and three-life Vientiane, believe that the development of things to three is the broad, vague interface of the renewal of Vientiane, and you can infinitely reverie the final result of the development of things. This is also the source of Confucius's thought on governing the country, and the source of Confucius's ideas of "benevolent and courteous governance" and "virtue for government".

As early as 2,000 years ago, the Chinese proposed that the development of things is not static, the stillness of the surface of things does not mean that the internal essence of things has not changed, and there is a mutually exclusive role of yin and yang within things, while Western empiricists did not propose until the nineteenth century that things publish a contractual role, and there can be continuity between subject and object, spirit and matter, experience and nature, and they can be regarded as an indivisible, eclectic unified whole.

This idea is equivalent to China's idea of the unity of heaven and man, the unity of knowledge and action.

Strategically, China likes to use Zhou Yi Thought to analyze the state of war, and tactically likes a broad and vague dialectical mode of thinking, but in looking at the results of the war, it has returned to the origin of the I Ching thinking, and simply uses the logic of thinking white and black, one or two to get two, to look at the development and continuation of the war. The outcome of the war is treated only by victory or defeat, so the Chinese only give honor to the victor, and for the loser, the prisoner of war has only one treatment, trampled under the foot, and the loser is cowardly.

However, Westerners are just the opposite of the Chinese in their view of war, and Westerners have a single trade-off between attack and retreat in terms of strategy and tactics, and the relationship between strategy and tactics is very clear and clear, that is, in terms of attack and retreat, the development and continuation of war are trade-off. However, in the view of the outcome of the war, it is very broad and vague, and there is no clear definition of the victor and the loser, and in the eyes of Westerners, as long as you participate in the war, you should be honored, so Westerners treat those who participate in the war equally, even if you become a prisoner of war, it is equally honorable and not shameful.

All this has a great relationship with the Chinese I Ching, which is easy to have the meaning of chameleon, so from Chinese university education can also understand the thinking of Chinese, everyone knows that the Western education system is completely different from the Chinese education system.

It's easy to go to university in the West, but it's hard to get a diploma. You have to learn the real thing to get out of college. In China, it is not easy to go to university, and it is not easy to enter the university by crossing a single-plank bridge, especially if you want to go to a good university, it is better than climbing to the sky. But as long as you get in, it's easy to come out.

Chinese universities are narrow in the entrance and loose on the inside. Western universities are loose in the entrance and narrow in the inside.

This is the root of the very different cultural and ideological interface between Chinese and Westerners.

The definition of Western culture is very broad and vague, but the content is very narrow and standardized, and the industry norms are very perfect, very serious, and very rule-based.

The definition of Chinese culture is very clear and clear, but the internal is very broad and vague, the industry norms are very monotonous, very general, lack of industry seriousness, pay attention to moral norms, but do not talk about industry rules.

This is the case with industry management in China, which values ethical standards but ignores industry rules.

In fact, what is morality, morality is conscious behavior, from the laws of nature, morality is a pothole on the road, when you pass by, you can see that you can go to bury it and then pass, you can also take a detour, morality is not binding.

Morality is self-disciplined behavior, there is no restraint, holding morality and holding consciousness are often linked, I have no consciousness, I don't abide by morality, what can you do to me? Morality is not binding, I don't fulfill morality, you have no way at all. However, the rules are different, the rules are binding, the rules are industry guidelines, and they are the legal guidelines formulated by the industry according to the laws of the industry, which are binding and are the industry regulations that everyone in the industry must abide by. Rules have responsibilities and obligations, and with responsibilities and obligations come necessity and constraints.

Due to the influence of Western culture, it is easy for Westerners to enter the industry, but it is not easy to enter it, you will be constrained by the industry system everywhere in it, and you may be punished if you don't pay attention to it, and you will be fined if you are light, and you will be fined to lose the industry.

The same is true for the stock market for Westerners, who value industry standards, and the industry guidelines are perfect. The industry access system is very relaxed, but it is also easy for you to get in and survive in it, but it is difficult to survive. When you enter, you have to follow the rules and do things strictly according to the rules of the industry. Otherwise, you will bear the consequences. Westerners have no sense of morality, only a sense of rules, and do not need to be self-disciplined, they only need to look at the rules and systems and strictly abide by them. Plain and simple, to the point.

Chinese everywhere talk about morality and self-discipline, but the industry standards are not clear and clear, and you can't see clearly where the red line is, where the zebra crossing, where you can walk and where you can't walk.

For example, in China's civil service system, if Chinese want to become civil servants, they must fully understand the principle of learning and excelling. You must go to university first, and you have to take the imperial examination after graduating from college, it is difficult to get in, but as long as you can get in, then you are a person, the road of officialdom is wide and boundless, you can gallop to your heart's content, and believe in the reins.

It is difficult for Chinese to become an official, but as long as you enter the official business, there is a lot of space inside. China's bureaucracy has been broad, vague, and general since ancient times, lacking the seriousness of the industry. Being an official in China is the happiest thing, glory and wealth, and fine clothes and jade food are the portrayal of Chinese officialdom. So Chinese bureaucrats are very easy to be corrupt, and this phenomenon is not something they themselves are willing to do, just because you don't have a clear red line, or there is a red line, but the red line is set very broadly, very vaguely, very generally, and not clear, so that people who walk in it can't find a rule, don't know which way to go, which road should not go, and the result is that people who shouldn't go will follow when they see others walking, and everyone will go on the same road, and no one will say anyone.

On the contrary, the entry system of civil servants in the West is very broad, but as long as you go inside, the rules and regulations inside are not the main roads of Rome, and you can go wherever you want. There are clear rules and a serious system in it, which can make an originally greedy person dare not take a step beyond the thunder pool. Therefore, being a civil servant in Western countries is not a bad thing, and many liberal-minded people do not compete for civil service positions, and there are far fewer corrupt civil servants than in China.

Being an official in China and not making a fortune means that you will not be able to be an official, which means that you have not made good use of the resources of being an official, and being an official in China does not simply rely on ability and action. In China, the network resources of being an official are very important, and there are people in the court who are good officials, and those who are officials in the court are equivalent to opening a door to the official mansion in the backyard of his house, and this door is opened for their family.

If you want to make money buying a big truck in China, you have to overload, and you can't make money if you don't overload and tire people to death, the reason is very simple, it is related to China's road administration system. The construction of China's road administration system is very narrow, that is, it is dedicated to the management of road administration chaos. However, the system setting is very broad, lacking enough seriousness, the industry rules are also very vague, very general, not clear, and the system design is narrow on the outside and wide on the inside, giving people the feeling that there is room for passing. Therefore, overloaded vehicles are also over, and overloaded vehicles are also over, overloading can be fined, and there is no specific limit for fines, so it can be punished and punished, and it is not possible to punish it, and there is only one way to get to the truck driver, admit the penalty, admit the excess.

Therefore, as long as there is a system in China, it always feels that this system is not designed for lawbreakers, but for officials to engage in corruption. Because the design of this system is very broad, very flexible, and very large. The system is designed to tell you that you can or may not pass. The boundary between the past and the past is very large, very flexible, as long as you are willing to accommodate, you can pass, if you choose not to be accommodating, then you stand still. Seeing others passing, don't be in a hurry, think about this threshold, and take the money.

Therefore, Chinese often say that as long as it can be done with money, it is not difficult.

Everything in this has to do with cultural ideas, with philosophical principles.

The ideological foundation of the Chinese is based on a very clear and clear definition, but the internal is very broad and vague, the industry norms are very monotonous, very general, lack of industry seriousness, pay attention to moral norms, but do not talk about industry rules.

The same is true of the police system in the West, where law enforcement is very simple, and the police can enforce the law, the definition is very simple. However, the responsibilities of the police in the West are very broad, ranging from defending the country to pooping and peeing.

In China, on the contrary, the industry classification is very fine, narrow on the outside and wide on the inside. There are many law enforcement agencies in China, and they are very detailed, down to the point that each department has a law enforcement unit. For example, highways are also divided into many law enforcement departments, such as the highway police under the management of the public security bureau, and the highway police under the management of the traffic bureau. Urban traffic is also under the cross-management of urban management and the police. In the town, you can see the police looking at the traffic light intersection, and the chengguan looking at the entrance and exit of the city, each doing their own thing and doing their best. In fact, it is a responsibility management road, but in China, it is very finely divided, each in charge of a section.

The reason for this is that there is a problem with the philosophical principles of the Chinese, and how to adjust and change this root thinking depends on the wisdom of politicians.

If we really want to eradicate this ideological origin from the root of thought, it is really not something that can be completely changed in one or two generations.

This is the result of the radical difference in cultural thinking between Chinese and Westerners. This is also the reason why Westerners meet and bluntly say that the weather is dark and sunny, and Chinese meet and implicitly ask if they have eaten.

;