Tang He's "The Girl We Chased Together in Those Years" is not long, a total of less than 60,000 words, so it took him two days to finish.

Then there's uploading.

After two days of fermentation, the Jinyong Inn has already been in flames.

Countless netizens slapped bricks against each other in the forum, saliva and bricks flew sideways, and the moderators couldn't delete the posts.

Before uploading the novel, Tang He probably browsed the webpage, and saw that the homepage of the Jinyong Inn was full of posts of melee between the two sides, and those normally serialized literary posts had long since sunk there.

And that blank is obviously a little too active, jumping around spreading rumors and making trouble.

And this guy is also very ghostly, but he bites the text and chews the words, but some netizens are so angry that they can't help but post and scold, and then they are deleted and banned by the moderator because of a slip of the tongue.

Looking at this person's speech, it is nothing more than to grasp the chaotic narrative of "The Legend of Wukong", the verbose and simple language, the rough writing skills, and the lack of too much literature to belittle Tang He.

And what made Tang He angry and disgusted the most was-

This guy always puts on an ugly face of his predecessors in the literary world between the lines, and always puts on the appearance of being at the end of his studies after pointing from above, which makes people really disgusted to watch.

After reading the theme post written in the blank again that is wordy, repetitive, and without a bit of aura and literary brilliance, Tang He sneered, and was not busy uploading "The Girl We Chased Together in Those Years", and directly posted a theme post at the Jinyong Inn "Blank "Teacher", the egg should be like this. , named and named this writer called blank to enter the post battle.

Then Tang He wrote in the theme post-

I haven't been here for two days, and I read the blank text (this person's writing is seriously not concise, I feel dizzy, and after reading a large paragraph of text with repeated views, I found that it was still the next article, which was too good. The most awesome is still to come, look at the title, this is still a brief analysis), excerpt some:

From a literary point of view, "The Legend of Wukong" is not yet literary writing, the narrative is chaotic, the dialogue is verbose, and there is not much literature.

The most important thing is that Don Quixote lacks control, he simply does not know how to control himself. Just as he believes in Ma Youyi's writing method in "The Legend of Wukong", there are some thoughts flashing in many places, but Don Quixote's writing method is only his own thinking, and does not consider the reader's acceptance and any existing mode.

……

Literature and movies have always been something that anyone can do, and there is no threshold.

It's a pity that some fools don't understand this, flattery and flattery shoot the sycophants of traditional literature, but it's a pity that this enthusiasm is useless, who knows the joy of your shit.

You think "The Legend of Wukong" is not pure literature, it doesn't matter, I never force "The Legend of Wukong" to be liked by everyone, let alone some idiots. But please don't think that the reader is all stupid, and just sober up.

Whether a book is good or not has little to do with whether it is literary or not.

For example, this blank "teacher", the writing is wordy, the views are repetitive, there is no aura and literary brilliance, if I don't hold back and want to say a few sentences, I really don't have the patience to read such a level of text. Therefore, it is conceivable that if he wants to write a novel, he will have to spend 10,000 words describing a tree.

And that's exactly what happened.

Looking at the love novel uploaded by this blank "teacher", more than 3,000 words were really used in the middle to describe the love actions of spicy eyes.

Some people write books, and no matter how they write them, they will be liked by readers, so they don't have to think about what to please readers, cater to the market, and write what they want to write.

On the contrary, some writers who claim to write pure literature must think from time to time, I need to add something eye-catching, I want to go to bed on page 30 (and I have to be in the wild), I have to be violent on page 80 (I have to die)......

It seems that these people feel that they write like this, and readers will be amazed when they read it, Nima, they are all human nature, they are all marginalized in society, they are all deranged in character, they care about human beings, they are awesome, pure literature.

It's really special to be a bitch and want to set up a torii!

In addition, some people in the article, between the lines, reveal a kind of rancid loftiness, revealing a sinister circle consciousness.

It seems that Ya is a member of the literary world, and it seems that Ya's fart is fragrant.

In fact, everyone who writes articles can be regarded as entering the literary world.

Don't be profound, every author is unique, every novel is artistic, and whether a work can be accepted by readers or not is not something that can be represented by whether the author enters the literary world.

Literature is all about writing seriously and casually.

That's all one can do, and everything else depends on creation.

Literature is the only thing that cannot be practiced hard and hard. Not to mention the hypocrisy of some people.

The most dangerous realm of literature is that it is really hypocritical, but I still feel that I am very sincere.

……

……

As soon as Tang He's name post came out, it immediately caused countless waves.

A large number of forum netizens poured in to take a look.

Then everyone was impressed by Don Quixote's sharp words.

"me!

"Nima, look at it. What a three-point game!"

"Haha, this!"

"Popularize it for everyone upstairs.,Blank serialized romance novel post,In the 14-page follow-up there,There are about 3,000 words of *****,Super spicy eyes,I don't think it's too much to say ****。 ”

"Really fake?Nima I said a few swear words and was deleted by the moderator.,This guy writes **** and is still alive?!"

"Before you delete the post, hurry up and take a look!"

"Don Quixote, this is an article of laughter and scolding!

"Isn't it a bit too much? How can the great god in my impression be so vulgar?"

"Vulgar, you big-headed ghost, you haven't seen the disgusting tone of the blank upstairs, what kind of big-tailed wolf!

“……”

Soon, Tang He's post was manually topped by netizens, and the replies increased vigorously, almost slowing down the refresh speed of the forum.

At this time, Tang He didn't care about the reply to this post, but opened another theme post, and wrote a very simple inscription in the theme post - let some people see what a real romance novel should look like!

Then I uploaded more than 50,000 words of "The Girl We Chased Together in Those Years" in one go.

The Internet speed in this era is not fast, and the number of words that can be posted is also limited, so by the time Tang He has uploaded all the documents, a long time has passed.

At this time, he noticed that the blank actually replied to the subject post-

The real reason for Don Quixote's dislike of my writing is that I don't think highly enough of his writing, that is, I think that "his "Legend of Wukong" has many problems in writing and cannot be called a literary work", which caused Don Quixote to be extremely dissatisfied. In the end, this is a literary question, which I will elaborate on in other articles.

Don Quixote, who thinks that "The Legend of Wukong" is "a rare pure literature in China", should be able to listen to different opinions with grace, and cannot "touch the tiger's buttocks", and when he hears it, he will be furious like thunder, swearing with swear language, and such garbage words as "fart", "force", "Nima", "Tema", and "Ya" not only cannot talk about "elegant quarrels", but also give "rare pure literature" a great irony.

Is this also "pure literature"? Is this still "rare"?

Don Quixote's scolding and Don Quixote's supporters are even more equatoring, and perhaps they also raise the question of how to abide by public morality and abide by the law in a new medium such as the Internet.

The freedom to express oneself anonymously online also opens up the possibility for some people to behave in a reckless manner. But no one has the privilege of insulting people by this, nor does he have the immunity to insult people irresponsible. He and them are at least subject to self-examination and public trial of the moral law.

I hope that such an incident will provide a negative example of how to legislate and build cyber ethics for the Internet.

Tang He sneered at it, and immediately opened the topic post and replied-

It was interesting to read the response of the blank "teacher".

Some people really have the ability to start making sanctimonious comments without carefully reading someone's article.

Take a closer look at the article, is there a word that scolds you?

If you insist that a blank "teacher" is the same as Mr. Idiot and that I am scolding, then I can't help it.

The meaning of the article is actually that don't talk about the literary world, don't pretend to be a big-tailed wolf in front of anyone, every codeword is a writer, and every writer is a codeword. In particular, I read the novels serialized by many people in Jinyong Inn, all of which are good writing and creativity, and these are all literature.

Please don't point fingers in the forum, and teach people how to write.

It's not that if you say it's literature, it's literature, and if you say it's not literature, it's writing.

Literature does not need anyone's affirmation and guidance.

In these years, anything can be literature except for the Xinhua News Agency's press release.

Of course, the characteristics and strengths of some people are, 1: I don't know what others are saying. 2: I don't know what to do. 3: I don't know what to do.

This has been elevated to Internet legislation.

You see how many netizens have left messages and scolded me since I serialized "The Legend of Wukong", and I was said to be a eunuch, why didn't you jump out to legislate and build Internet morality at that time.

It's not okay to scold you on the head now.

Is this the people-oriented approach to legislation?

You're having a double standard!