6. The core of supply-side structural reform is that the market plays a decisive role in the allocation of resources and the government plays a better role.

It can be said that in terms of the market, it is necessary to prevent the government from interfering inappropriately in property rights and prices, restore the instinct of property rights and prices in the market, and then encourage the right ones, invigorate the mechanism, and the market belongs to the market, and the market is governed by the market.

Of course, on the part of the government, it is necessary to prevent the government from acting inaction and disorderly acts, streamlining the administration of the army, and delegating power and giving up profits. Moreover, the government must make sure that it cannot do anything without the authorization of the law.

Furthermore, deepening supply-side structural reform essentially means properly handling the relationship between the government and the market, standardizing the relationship between the government and the market, coordinating the relationship between the government and the market, and purifying the relationship between the government and the market, so that the socialist market is first and foremost a market governed by the rule of law, and the socialist government is first and foremost a government governed by the rule of law.

Having said that, deepening supply-side structural reform is an inevitable measure to deepen reform and opening up to a specific stage, and implementation is the key.

Obviously, the supply-side structural reform is also inseparable from macro management, one is for long-term sustainable development, one is to ensure the current stable environment, in principle, each has a division of labor, in fact, echoes each other, of course, this basic relationship is grasped, reform and development stability can be guaranteed!

7. Where there are people, there are rivers and lakes, and where there are rivers and lakes, there are struggles. Then, in the academic world, too, there is an endless struggle within the academic school, within the folk school, and between the academic school and the civil school.

For example, "Lin Yifu's Academic Criticism" and "Miao Xiangxiang Controversy" are the products of various struggles.

Of course, the struggle in the cultural and ideological circles is mainly questioning and criticizing, repeatedly, and endlessly. For example, I am a self-taught independent economist, and many people can't believe it at first, and this kind of criticism is overwhelming, some are mild, some are more intense.

Of course, as a party concerned, I kept explaining, and it was useless to explain the results, so I could only publish a large number of articles to prove myself.

It can be said that "What Says About China's Economy" and "Lin Yifu's Academic Criticism" are my true records in economics and China's economic research, and "Meditations on Academic Life" and "Modern Dharma Enlightenment" are my true records in academic and social life research.

In my opinion, this kind of struggle, which seems rather meaningless on the surface, is actually of great significance, on the one hand, a hundred schools of thought contend, a hundred flowers bloom, and on the other hand, the spirit of independence, free thought, and the improvement of cultural literacy.

I remember that when Mr. Wang Meng talked about the struggle in the literary and art circles, a leader vividly described that he had been fighting since the time of the Left League, and when he arrived in Yan'an, he was fighting even more fiercely, establishing New China, and continuing to fight.

Until the Cultural Revolution, it was all over. As soon as the Cultural Revolution ended, the fight broke out again. In the end, the people on both sides died, and at first glance, the eulogies were the same, they were all excellent literary and artistic warriors, they all made outstanding contributions, and they were all huge losses - no one fought for a single tael or a penny!

8. Around the first month of this year, my father had an upset stomach, which affected his normal diet, that is, after eating, he always felt abdominal pain, very uncomfortable, and he didn't rest well at night.

So, I went to see an old Chinese medicine doctor, graduated from middle school, was in his sixties, said that it was a duodenal ulcer, and as a result, I continued to eat more than a dozen Chinese medicines, of course, with Western medicine, and I was also eating it at the same time, for nearly a month.

However, the condition is still the same, and there is no substantial improvement. In the end, there was really no way, and I went to see a young and middle-aged doctor, graduated from Xi'an Medical College, in his forties, after a systematic examination, he said that it was gastritis, so he prescribed several Western medicines, and after going home and taking it for three or five days, the results were obviously much better, no longer painful, much more comfortable, and everything returned to normal.

Then, this shows that the prescription prescribed in the front is not correct, and the prescription in the back is symptomatic, and the effect is naturally different.

One possibility is that the knowledge structure of old doctors is aging, while the knowledge structure of young doctors is advanced.

After all, one uses traditional Chinese medicine to heal the disease, and the other uses modern Western medicine to heal the disease. In fact, I also have experience with Chinese medicine and Western medicine, Western medicine is quick to get started and the effect is obvious, while Chinese medicine is obviously lagging behind.

In China's economics community, there is a similar situation, most of the elderly economists are not PhDs in economics, nor have they studied abroad, and their knowledge structure is aging, while most of the younger economists are PhDs in economics, and they also have many years of study abroad experience, and their knowledge structure is advanced.

Why, then, are elderly economists more popular in China? It is very likely that China is a place with a strong traditional culture, and seniority is more serious.

In addition, whether it is the Chinese government or the market, the lack of effective restraint and supervision of the rule of law, all kinds of intervention, and all kinds of distortions, the actual situation of such developing countries is more complicated than that of developed countries.

9. In Sina love to ask, someone asks,

Who put forward the programmatic slogan of "owned by the people, governed by the people, and enjoyed by the people"? netizen ttyd1314 replied as follows:

The programmatic slogan of "by the people, by the people, and by the people" was put forward by US President Abraham Lincoln. This is a famous quote from US President Abraham Lincoln's Gettysburg address on November 19, 1963.

The original English text is (more or less so, there may be some discrepancies) :(Thegovernment) ofthepeople, bythepeople, forthepeople (illneverdie).

Some people translate it as: (this) government of the people, by the people, and for the people will never disappear. From here, it can be seen that the original English text is very concise, and the meaning is deeper than the Chinese translation.

Three prepositions vividly reflect the nature of this government: of: the table belongs, indicating that the government belongs to the people, not the people belong to the government;

"Governance") and not to use (does not belong

When political power is "governed", it is the people (or their elected representatives) who exercise it, not the officials;

And, the people are willing

"Enjoy" this government on

"Enjoy";

"Enjoy", the government has no right to ask the people to go

"Enjoy", otherwise it is violated

The principle of "the purpose of the people". I Miao Shi believes that looking back at the 20 th century and looking forward to the 21 st century, China should emancipate its mind and keep pace with the times

"The monarch and the people share, the monarch and the people govern together, and the monarch and the people share" and work hard. It can be said that for a long time, there has been an old tradition in China of ruling and being ruled by the ruler for the superior and the noble and the people for the lowly, which seriously does not meet the inherent requirements of modern society and urgently needs to be corrected by reform and opening up.

Moreover, without political reform, economic and social reform will not be complete, and may even be abandoned halfway.

Mencius said: "However, the only way to govern the world is to cultivate and to do things with adults, and things to do with small people." And one person's body and a hundred workers are prepared, if they must do it themselves and then use it, it is to lead the world and the road. Therefore, it is said: or labor, or labor. Those who work hard govern people, those who work hard govern people, those who govern others eat people, those who govern people eat people. The common meaning of the world is also. What does that mean? Mencius said, "Is it better to govern the world while ploughing? There are things for the officials and things for the small people." In addition, a person has to rely on various craftsmen to prepare it for him, and if he must make it himself and then use it, this will cause people in the world to be tired. So: some people use their minds, some people use their physical strength. He who uses his mind governs others, he who uses his physical strength is governed by others, he who is governed by others supports others, and he who governs others depends on others to support him. This is a common truth in the world. Of course, Sun Yat-sen's ideas of people-owned, people-governed and people-shared have completely broken through the limitations of ancient people-oriented thought, and are fundamentally different from ancient people-oriented thought. The people-oriented thought of the feudal era did not include respect for the individual values and rights of ordinary people, which was completely different from the democratic thought of modern times. Sun Yat-sen's meaning of "owned by the people, governed by the people, and enjoyed by the people" means that the country is shared by the people, politics is jointly managed by the people, and interests are shared by the people! 10. Twenty years ago, on February 19, 1997, Deng Xiaoping, the chief architect of China's reform, opening up, and modernization, passed away. Just now, I checked Baidu Encyclopedia, and he has 26.85 million views. It can be said that the observation and evaluation of Deng Xiaoping cannot be separated from the two climates, the international climate and the domestic microclimate. Obviously, the Deng Xiaoping era was a product of the interweaving of the international climate and the domestic microclimate, and there was a general environment for peaceful development in the international arena and a strong demand for reform and opening up in the country. At this critical moment, this group of people headed by Deng Xiaoping stood up, emancipated their minds, advanced with the times, boldly launched and continued to promote reform and opening up, and in a down-to-earth and orderly manner, they integrated backward and rigid China into the world, and then embarked on the normal track of modernization and development. Of course, every era has its cleverness, and there will inevitably be regrets, and the Deng Xiaoping era is no exception. Moreover, what we should do now is to carry forward the pioneering and enterprising spirit of the Deng Xiaoping era, be determined to carry out reforms, be bold in innovation, deepen reform and opening up, and push the modernization drive to a higher stage Chinese.

Miao Shi (formerly known as Zhang Chuntian, the word Miao Shi, the number Daolin), a native of Meixian County, Xifu, Shaanxi, a famous scholar, an independent economist, president and chief economist of the National Transformation Research Institute (preparing), is known as one of the most controversial folk economists in China, and is the author of "What China's Economy Says", "Meditations on Academic Life", "Lin Yifu's Academic Criticism", "Selected Works of Scholar Miao Shi" and "Master Miao's Truth", and edited "Miao Xiangxiang Controversy" and "China's Economic Guide" 1 to 16 volumes, all of which can be downloaded for free, welcome to read and guide.

From September 1996 to July 2001, he studied physics in Baoji University of Arts and Sciences, and began to study and research economics in his sophomore year; from August 2001 to September 2013, in the Miao Shi Research Laboratory, Mr. Lin Yifu, Mr. and Mr. Lin Yifu, engaged in economics and Chinese economic research, especially focusing on the institutional macro and rural issues in economic transformation; October 2013 - In April 2014, he studied regional economic issues under the tutelage of Professor Bai Yongxiu, a well-known economist, at Northwest University, and served as a part-time researcher at Shaanxi Yongxiu Institute of Economics and Management.

Since September 2009, he has published a large number of articles on many websites such as the Home of Economics and Management (formerly the Economic Forum of the National People's Congress), Grassroots Network, Tianya Financial Forum, Kaidi Community, Sina Weibo, Yihui.com, Sina Miscellaneous, China Forum, Sina Blog, Blog China, China Economic Forum, Phoenix Blog, Tianya Blog, Value China, Economist Forum, Elite Blog, North American Blog, Hexun Blog, etc., which are deeply loved by the majority of netizens, and have a great reputation and sensation, and enjoy a wide reputation in the economic or financial commentary circles, and have a high reputation in China's online media.

According to relevant statistics, Miao Shi's series of works since the publication of the article has been downloaded by 12,856 people so far, with a total of more than 20 million clicks on various articles, more than 60,000 replies received, and 41 special comments on articles.