Tian Haimo's words, analyzed in detail, and the theoretical context are extremely clear, which is the essence of the dialectic technique of the middle stream.

So as soon as she finished speaking, the attitude of most of the audience in the audience was almost turned around, and they even thought that they had "finally jumped out of the trap of stealing the concept of law school" and were complacent.

"Despicable! I didn't expect Senior Sister Tian to be such a person! Isn't this a direct copy of Bai Zhizhong's tricks! What kind of ability is this! It's all up to you to think about your own ability!" Yu Meiqin almost subconsciously spat softly, but the volume was very low, and outsiders didn't hear it.

Yu Meiqin's level is the second strongest in the law school in the field, and she has certainly seen the arguments of both sides in all the international college debate tournaments over the years.

So she and Feng Jianxiong immediately saw through the source of Tian Haimo's rhetoric. And non-professional debaters like Nan Xiaoyuan and Jiang Sisi, who were cramming before the game, haven't reacted yet.

"Don't do that, you can't call it copying. Feng Jianxiong was beside Yu Meiqin, listening to the sister's complaints, he didn't have so much time to explain, so he could only comfort him quickly in two or three seconds, "Every sentence was temporarily organized by Senior Sister Tian according to the on-the-spot interaction, just borrowing from the words and ideas of the predecessors. ”

The most common trick of the middle stream argument in refuting the argument is to accurately organize the core arguments that the other party has said before, and then deduce that "these core arguments can fully demonstrate the conclusion of XXX, but ......"

This "but" is the point.

"But", XXX's conclusion is not the same thing as today's debate.

To put it bluntly, in fact, Feng Jianxiong also used similar words when he sublimated the realm of the debate topic of "whether it is a necessary condition for talking about morality".

For example, he first summarized what the other party said a lot, just arguing that "you can do good deeds without food and clothing", and then a "but" knocked the opponent into the abyss - you said so much, it is not right at all. The "morality" here follows the word "talk", which is noun, not adjective, so the debate is only a topic of classification of behavioral norms, not a topic of good and evil tendencies.

This kind of trick, if used accurately, is very lethal.

However, it is also very demanding for the user's level - because he has to have a strong ability to summarize and summarize on the spot, summarize the other party's broken annoyance that he sprayed for seven or eight minutes before, and then explain what he actually wants to prove, and this "what" is not consistent with today's debate.

If this kind of summary does not convince the jury and at the same time serves its own interests, the rebuttal tactics of the middle-class dialectic cannot be used indiscriminately.

The "on-the-spot summary" focuses on the "on-the-spot", and it is impossible to rely on pre-game preparation.

A slow-working and meticulous student who works hard, if he lacks the quick wit to react super quickly, he can only cry out in vain.

This field is for high-IQ geniuses who respond quickly.

Count on the stupid bird to fly first and rely on diligence...... Hehe, mentally retarded is mentally retarded! Hard work cannot be saved!

The host Su Qin also breathed a sigh of relief.

Tian Haimo was willing to put down the discipline and couldn't help but learn this trick, Feng Jianxiong was probably more fierce and less lucky.

This is the famous skill of the Asian Emperor of Spray! Even if it is learned by the main force of an ordinary 211 university team, the lethality is greatly reduced by seven or eighty percent, it shouldn't be something that a stunned young man can resist, right?

At this moment, it is the professional judges who feel the score tilt more keenly than the audience.

As soon as the so-called connoisseur makes a move, he will know if there is one. The IQ of the people who eat melons is too low, so they will watch the excitement. The judges have a very clear mind, and they remember clearly what the two sides said and what scoring points were in each link.

The psychological reaction of these parties, which may seem like a thousand words, actually happens in a matter of seconds.

Because Feng Jianxiong immediately stood up.

"Senior Sister Tian, if you just want to find someone who is also familiar with the 'Six Arts of Gentlemen', I can find it for you right now, the requirements for books, mathematics, and etiquette are too low, and it is estimated that most outstanding college students can do it, so we don't have to discuss it." Wouldn't the rest be able to ride a horse, shoot archery and play the piano? I can not only ride a horse but also drive, can the ancients? I can not only know the guzheng but also the keyboard, can the ancients know how to shoot arrows and shoot guns?

Therefore, the 'ancient skills were more comprehensive' that you just said are only because ancient science and technology were not developed, there were too few possibilities for human development, and everything could be learned without taking up too much effort.

However, this does not mean that with the progress of science and technology and the detailed division of labor in society, modern people will not be able to learn more things. One wants to learn all the skills of the ancients, and at the same time can drive a car, repair computers, surveying and mapping...... It can be done. It's just that the social division of labor doesn't necessarily require so many skills, and the people who deploy their own life learning plans in this way don't necessarily have a social competitive advantage, that's all. ”

Feng Jianxiong spent about half a minute at a time, and first found the basic rhythm that was taken away by Tian Haimo just now. used a similar trick to intercept Tian Haimo's tirade with "although the phenomenon is right, the causal relationship between it and the debate is insufficient".

The momentum of the scene suddenly eased.

"Wonderful, although I don't feel finished, but the development of science and technology does provide a lot of possibilities, just because human beings themselves have not chosen to learn comprehensively...... Why do you always feel that something is wrong......" Countless melon-eating people thought so, feeling that their brains had been split into two parts by Tian Haimo and Feng Jianxiong.

"If you use this trick too, then I don't have any psychological guilt. Tian Haimo's reaction turned out to be a sigh of relief.

She didn't think much about it, and immediately asked rhetorically: "You also said that in the modern scientific and technological society, well-rounded people will have insufficient social competitiveness, so there is a high probability that human beings will not choose such all-round development - even if theoretically he can achieve all-round development - that just proves our point of view: the progress of science and technology will hinder the all-round development of mankind!"

You must know that even if the social problems caused by the development of science and technology are indirectly caused, it is also a manifestation of science and technology hindering the all-round development of human beings!"

"How can this be equated? The deviation of the mainstream values of society leads to the inability of mankind to develop in an all-round way, and the development of science and technology directly leads to the inability of mankind to develop in an all-round way, which are completely different things!"

A clear and soft female voice suddenly spoke, Tian Haimo glanced sideways, only to notice that it was Yu Meiqin who seamlessly picked it up.

"As I said just now, scientific development has given human beings more possibilities than the ancients, and naturally it can promote more all-round development of human beings. And in fact, the ancients were not 'comprehensive', the ancestors who understood the six arts of the gentleman also said that farming is 'the business of the villain', and said that 'the gentleman cooks far away', so it can be seen that they don't know how to farm and cook. So the ancients only learned those, but there were too few areas of knowledge and skills in ancient times, and they didn't have a choice at all. Technology offers possibilities, so how can technology be blamed?

Then, let's talk about the issue of mainstream social values - just now Senior Sister Tian told us that because technology has changed the form of social competition, forcing those who want to make themselves competitive to have to face a more detailed social division of labor, so human beings are becoming more and more specialized in a few skills, and science should be blamed - I can only say that this pot science is not memorized. Because it's a problem with the social system.

I don't know if you have traveled to the Nordic welfare countries that implement the social attention system, but I have been there, and I have met a bunch of college students who have studied many majors, and they are still very strange majors.

I asked one of the students who had studied music, art and other things, but none of them were very famous: What if you learn everything, you are not good at anything, and you can't find a job in the future?

She was shocked by my question: if you can't find a job, you can't find a job! What does it matter? If you can't find it, you can get basic benefits first, or you can slowly find a job that is not related to your university studies.

Does it have anything to do with what you study in college and what kind of work you do? Isn't it to study in college to learn things that you find fun? Why should you tie college to your career plan?

In fact, we don't need to go to the Nordic countries, even in Germany, where the benefits are a little worse – I went to Europe for three months last summer, and I met some university students there.

Their attitude is: If you go to a vocational school for the sake of work skills, why do you have to go to college? University does not guarantee that you will be able to find a job after graduation! Learning is a kind of consumption to improve self-cultivation, and in their eyes, it is the same nature as playing games to recharge, and it is not normal to have no return? When you charge Ma Teng Q coins and make yourself stronger in the game, do you expect those Q coins to increase your value in the real world in the future?

Therefore, for the sake of one's own social competitiveness, we are forced to learn more and more specialized and narrow knowledge, which is not caused by scientific development at all, but by the mainstream values of our society and the social distribution system.

With the same science and different societies, people can completely avoid this kind of problem, but we can't. Isn't such a control group experiment illustrative enough?"

Although Yu Meiqin's words were a bit long, everyone didn't remind her to pay attention to the time.

Her tone is also very graceful and luxurious, natural and generous, and she can't see the attribute of pretending to be forced at all.

Tian Haimo felt that the other party's words were a bit nonsense at first, or "don't eat the fireworks of the world".

But after hearing it, I chewed it carefully and found that I couldn't refute it.

"It's really the eldest lady of a rich family, and even the words 'whoever stipulates that if you study well, you can get a good job', you can say it so justifiably. Tsk, that's a step up from what I said in my pre-match preparations. After hearing this, Feng Jianxiong was also secretly speechless, and sighed in his heart.

Before the game, when Feng Jianxiong was discussing and preparing with Yu Meiqin, he thought of the question of "once the other party mentions the narrowing of people's choices, they should throw the pot of science and technology to the social system and values".

Feng Jianxiong also taught Yu Meiqin the core idea of the most outline.

Unexpectedly, Yu Meiqin's last performance in stealing the scene was more perfect than Feng Jianxiong's expected routine.

But who is to blame for this? Feng Jianxiong is a representative of the "Chinese dream" and a hard-working background. Compared with tranquility and desirelessness, of course, he can't compare to Yu Meiqin, who is rich in the family and never has to think about livelihood.

"Wow? Listening to Yu Xuemei's words, how rich does her family have to be, and how much does she not eat the fireworks of the world? I just feel that these words come out of her mouth so naturally. Alas, reincarnation is a technical job!"

"Alas, this is the revenge of the father, and it cannot be avenged. "Then take the husband! I don't believe that her life is so good!"

Countless melon-eating seniors were disheartened for a while, and they all felt the same way.