Wuhan University spends most of its time arguing that "what we want to talk about today is the mainstream, not about individual cases." To say that there is no doubt in employing people means that this form occupies the mainstream of contemporary society, not that there is absolutely no doubt or no doubt. At the same time, relying on system building makes people unable to do certain things, and cannot be interpreted as 'suspicion' of them, which is for their own good and builds mutual trust. ”

Although these words are a little obscene in momentum, they have to be said to be very effective. blocked a lot of offensive angles on the side of Jinling Division.

At the end of the argument, Wu Da's first debate of course also gave some examples, such as "Liu Bei unreservedly entrusted Zhuge Liang to Gu, in exchange for Zhuge Ge's dedication and death in the second half of his life;

However, these are not the main points, just to rely on the ranking to find some aura, which is the usual rhetoric of debate.

Soon it was Ximen Zhenji's turn to represent the opposing party.

She adjusted her mood for a moment, and as soon as she came up, she took the lead: "Thank you very much for mentioning Zhao Gou's suspicion of Yue Fei for us just now, and the ten years of harm were ruined in one fell swoop—so the opponent's defense friend must want to persuade Zhao Gou to learn from Zhou Shizong, and trust Yue Fei like Chai Rong trusted his brother of the Lie Ancestor, right?"

Modern people may not understand the word Liezu. However, in ancient Chinese, because ancient Confucianism attached great importance to ethical generations, ancestors and descendants all traced back to the nine generations and still had special titles.

The father of the great-grandfather is Gaozu, and Gaozu is the Heavenly Ancestor and the Martyr Ancestor when he goes up. So Liezu is "grandpa's grandpa's grandpa".

For Zhao Gou, the grandfather of his grandfather is Zhao Guangyi. "Liezu's brother" of course refers to Zhao Kuangyin.

Just one sentence of the opening counterattack made several judges react slightly sluggishly for three or four seconds, and then couldn't help but laugh out loud secretly.

"Wuda started to be reasonable, but the final example comparison was really distracting, and I was caught by someone all of a sore foot. However, that Ximen Zhenji reacted so quickly and spoke so easily, but she was really anxious. ”

The audience is not as literate as the judges, so they naturally need to react longer, but no matter how dull the person is, after seeing others laughing, they will definitely be curious and ask each other where the joke is. In this way, everyone in the stadium understood this stalk in less than half a minute.

This meme is actually nothing, and keyboard warriors on the Internet know it. But if you can react so quickly, speak so concisely, and be witty and neat, and have a strong voice, then you can see the level.

Those who originally regarded Ximen Zhenji as a vase carried by Feng Jianxiong and Yu Meiqin purely because of her beauty or good family background also changed their views slightly.

Ximen Zhenji took advantage of the momentum of the scene to be taken back, and talked about the benefits of system construction and the necessity of using suspicious people.

"As we all know, modern society has become more and more complex in human relations and more frequent cooperation. And it is impossible for one to continue to work closely with all the collaborators who have a deep understanding, a good understanding of the person, and a good understanding of the heart, as in ancient times. It is precisely for this reason that in order to overcome the difficulties of overly diverse cooperation in modern society, we need a set of institutional 'suspicions' to make people do things well and not dare to do evil.

Therefore, 'suspicion' is beneficial, and it is precisely in the punishment of the former and the latter that the disease is cured and the person is saved. According to the research of McQuay Capcom, an authoritative professor of mental psychology at MIT, 'there are only 150~200 close cognitive partners that our Homo sapiens brain instincts can accept'. Beyond that, we will not be able to build close trust.

But the organizational structure of corporations and other nonprofits in modern society has given leaders far more people to face, understand, and communicate with than they can directly face. In this general tone, we don't have the time and energy, nor the biological instinct to fully understand everyone, so we can only doubt and use ...... after we have doubted."

Ximen Zhen Ji grasped the time very well, and when there were still four or five seconds left in 3 minutes, she ended her speech. The script she originally scheduled was memorized many times, just 3 minutes, and at the beginning, the example of Yue Fei was improvised, and it was immediately typed back according to the other party's example, and the time used was completely excessive, so the speed of speech had to be accelerated later.

Ximen Zhenji was a little nervous, so she sped up a little bit, and there were 4 seconds left in the end, but in general it was already very accurate.

"As an anti-square theory, the overall situation is already very good, but it does not reflect enough characteristics to compete with the positive side. The positive side seems to expect that the opposing side will say that 'the basis of cooperation in modern society must be doubtful', so the main focus of the argument is on 'employing people without doubt does not mean that there is no doubt at all, but only that doubt is not the mainstream, but faith is the mainstream'.

Ximen Zhenji did not counterattack in the center and slap her face in the face at this point, as the opposite, that is, 'you hit yours, I hit mine', which belongs to stage fright to avoid confrontation. ”

Several judges glanced at each other, and their hearts were basically the same.

Ximen Zhenji's opening statement was very stable, but the response was insufficient, and there was no focus, which shows that most of them were prepared before the game, and the on-the-spot play began that paragraph.

These problems are not visible to the audience, they are not at this level, but the judges will adjust the scoring scale in their hearts because of this.

"In general, let's start at five or five, the response is insufficient, the opening is quick and witty, and the two sides are tied. ”

The moderator said a few brief cutscenes, and then the two sides immediately entered into cross-examination.

This is the real hand-to-hand fight.

The second debate of Zhengfang Wuda stood up and quickly launched a key attack on the theory of Ximen Zhenji's structure just now.

"May I ask the opponent's defense friend, what you just said about 'employing people should be suspicious', does this 'want' mean that the more the better, occupying the mainstream of the employment law in this society? Or do you think that even a little bit is considered 'want'?"

Nan Xiaoyuan wanted to stand up and answer immediately, but Feng Jianxiong quietly pressed her thigh under the table, signaling to be calm.

Nan Xiaoyuan immediately quieted down, realizing that the first question was still answered by Ximen Zhenji herself, which seemed to be more imposing-

The other party obviously asked questions about what Ximen Zhen Ji said in his argument just now, if the opposing side did not let Ximen Zhen Ji take over, it would lose impression points, making the judges feel that "it turns out that this team's first debate will only recite a draft of the argument before the opening, and there is no ability to go head-to-head at all."

Ximen Zhenji also felt the inexplicable trust in the air and became calmer. She only thought about it for two seconds, and then replied crisply: "Everything has a degree, and of course the more doubts the better." However, we also believe that 'doubt' is a common necessity, and its existence is beneficial to the employment and cooperation of contemporary society, not 'a little' or 'accident'. ”

Wu Da's second debate immediately changed his perspective: "Then let me change the way of asking - if today you say that you 'want' to be a person who honors your parents, is it just a little bit of filial piety? Or is it that as long as it does not conflict with the value hierarchy of other virtues, filial piety is the more virtue the better?"

Ximen Zhenji was a little unable to get around, and Nan Xiaoyuan only then did he recuperate and intercept the opponent's attack, and said decisively: "There is no other value level conflict, of course, the more filial piety, the better, but the marginal cost should also be considered." If filial piety to 95 points requires a cost that exceeds the cost of filial piety to 90 points, and these costs could have been used to do other more meaningful things, then it is natural to master this degree in everything. ”

Wu Da's second argument momentum was slightly contained, and he continued to detour: "In the employment and management of people, if suspicion does not harm people, and has a certain effect, do you think that the more suspicion, the better? Otherwise, isn't the word 'want' here a double standard with the word 'want' mentioned in the 'filial piety' you just said?"

Nan Xiaoyuan has been watching from the sidelines for so long, and in the face of this kind of hand-to-hand grappling, she is naturally calmer, she said cautiously and decently: "If more 'doubts' can indeed improve efficiency, and the benefits are higher than the costs paid, then of course it is okay to have more." If the suspicion increases further, causing the giving to be more expensive than the get, then of course it must be done in moderation. Please don't mess around and talk about this issue without the 'marginal cost'.

Hundreds of years ago, Parcelassus knew that 'everything is poisonous, harmless but the dose is insufficient', and if you can eat and drink water, you can eat and drink the dead, and of course you must consider the marginal cost!"

When you see this, you may also think that this short confrontation is a bit boring, but there is really no way - because historically, Wuhan University has mainly focused on attacking in this place in this debate competition. They spent five minutes pestering: "If you say 'doubt', you must prove that 'suspicion' is the mainstream of society, not just 'suspicion' and 'suspicion has its value'." ”

If it can't prove the mainstream, Wuhan University will brutally say, "Thank you for acknowledging our point of view."

Historically, the University of Malaya, which played against it, was also a little mistaken at this point, and finally lost the key match point.

The opponent's thinking is not something that Feng Jianxiong can control, and he can't play the butterfly effect if he wants to.

Therefore, in the process of the main attack stage on the side of Wuda, it is not surprising that the rhythm of the questioning side is relatively similar to that of another time and space. The only difference is that Ximen Zhen Ji and Nan Xiaoyuan, under Feng Jianxiong's tutelage, perform more steadily and firmly than the historical University of Malaya, and emphasize the concept of "marginal cost". It's a little more than Malaya in another plane.

It took three minutes for each side to go, and as Chen Ming, the number one main force of Wuhan University, joined the ranks of questioning, the situation seemed to be gradually more favorable to Wuhan University.

It's nothing, though.

Chen Ming is on the field, which means that Feng Jianxiong should also play.

He doesn't run away from head-to-head confrontation like other debaters. Feng Jianxiong's biggest technical feature is that from which angle the opponent attacks, he will directly hit back head-on.

You have given up decency, and you don't want to talk about the benefits of 'no doubt', you just want to say 'doubt must be moderate, and if it is not the mainstream, it is not called doubt', then brother will tell you this detail in a dignified manner.

On the Maginot Line, where you thought you had shrunk your ground and made your defenses ironclad, you have made a bloody way out.

Well, it's not quite appropriate to say "Maginot Line".

Although Maginot did not cover all aspects, it was also a product of the idea of "all-front defense", and it was not intended to give away the great rivers and mountains of France at the beginning of the design.

And the Wuda led by Chen Ming obviously played the contraction tactics of "strong walls and clear fields".

The point of "doubting or not doubting which is the mainstream of employment in contemporary society" is obviously their last stronghold.

Therefore, it is more or less the same as the "fortress of Sevastopol" to their defense zone.

And in the face of the fortress, Feng Jianxiong was about to take out his Doraemon cannon - Lao Tzu doesn't care if you are covered with 20-meter-thick granite and 1-meter-thick steel plates, and say that if you take it away with one shot into the soul, you will take it away with one shot into the soul.

……

"It seems that the opponent's defense friend is very entangled in 'doubt or non-doubt which is the mainstream of employment in contemporary society', okay, then I will answer your question positively - we believe that 'doubt' is the mainstream, that is to say, doubt is the majority, and no doubt is an individual or non-mainstream situation. Clear enough, right?"

Feng Jianxiong stood up and threw out a bombshell that made the audience uproar.

Just like when Doraemon cannon spoke, the sound shook for ten miles.

Chen Ming, who was on the other side, had just slaughtered Ximen Zhen Ji and Nan Xiaoyuan with a sense of accomplishment, and he was a little overwhelmed when he heard this.

He never thought that Feng Jianxiong's side would dare to directly accept the challenge head-on at the point with the strongest defense on the side of Wuda.

You must know that Feng Jianxiong's remarks are very politically incorrect. Moreover, it is definitely easy to be regarded as a show for the sake of thick black studies, reducing social efficiency, and reducing human mutual trust...... All in all, even if it makes sense, it is easy to be regarded as a "yin person" and black.

"The opponent's defense friend actually thinks that 'suspicion' is the mainstream of employing people in contemporary society? Not just the 'necessary' you just said? Can I understand it that way?" Chen Ming was still slightly unconvinced, and actually confirmed it.

Feng Jianxiong smiled proudly, very determined: "Just follow the understanding you said in the second half of the sentence - as for the first half of the sentence, it is just 'you think', we never said that doubt is not the mainstream, and naturally there is no 'change' to 'any new position.'" ”

Feng Jianxiong's openness made the four opponents on the opposite side feel great mental pressure.

Because he's so sure.

Just like Li Zhuge Liang every time he says "Hehe, you have a plan", even if the other party doesn't know what the plan is, he will drop 30 morale points first.

This is the name of the defending champion, which no one else can imitate.

Chen Ming spent a full seven or eight seconds sorting out his thoughts, and then began to refute - these seven or eight seconds were all watched, because after Feng Jianxiong finished saying what he just said and sat down, the timer on the host's side had already begun to time the square.

"Then I would like to ask the other side of the debate, what do you think about the increasingly detailed division of labor and cooperation in modern successful enterprises? In our argument, we emphasized that Sun Tzu said that the one who can but does not control will win. As we all know, the most likely thing to do bad in this era is that the layman is in charge of the insider, and the opponent wants to deny even this common sense? If you are the owner of an Internet start-up company, how do you want to suspect and spy on your CEO, do you understand all his considerations?

Further, how do you monitor and suspect your CTO? Do you want to ask about the technical issues yourself? Or do you send some external technical talent to 'check each other down'? Do you think such a company can make people feel respected and can really create valuable progress and innovation?"