"I don't understand why the other side of the debate misunderstood me like this - I just said that suspicion is the mainstream, and the use of people should be suspicious, and suspicion should also be used. How can it be interpreted as 'mutual containment and imperial tricks'? Is the opponent's defense friend too much of the thick black study, and his heart is too dark?

I think you are more suspicious and suspicious than me, and I am very grateful to the opponent for proving our point of view with his own practical actions. ”

Feng Jianxiong's downplay of a few witty words caused some of the audience with insufficient concentration to laugh, and also gave more mental pressure and morale debuff to the senior of Wuhan University.

Of course, it is also necessary to have confidence in saying this. If the other party insists on getting to the bottom of the matter, but in the end Feng Jianxiong can't justify himself, then any force he pretended to be just now will become a fool, and the higher he climbs, the heavier he falls.

Chen Ming was naturally unwilling, and he naturally chose to put a low profile and get to the bottom of it.

He sneered and asked: "Then I'm going to listen respectfully: May I ask classmate Feng, how do you think employers should do it', forgive me for being a shallow learner, I really can't imagine this possibility."

BY THE WAY, I HEARD THAT IN ADDITION TO STUDYING AND DEBATING, YOU HAVE ALSO BEEN AN INVESTOR - TWO YEARS AGO IN THIS ARENA, YOU SHOWED YOUR PERSONAL EXPERIENCE OF INVESTING IN NICONICO VIDEO NETWORK TO THE SENIOR IN THE MIDDLE OF THE WHITE OFFICE. I'd like to know, are you so suspicious of the entrepreneurs you invest in in reality, and hinder them from doing things? You don't think that you are not only legally knowledgeable, but also more knowledgeable in management and technology than professionals!"

After Chen Ming said this, he should have stopped there. But he obviously learned the lesson of Bai Zhizhong's overturn two years ago, and warned himself in his heart that he must not take it lightly.

Therefore, he did not rush to sit down, but stood and smacked for three or four seconds, preferring to waste a few more seconds by typing the watch, and then finally added:

"Of course, I believe that you yourself may be a wizard and an all-rounder, classmate Feng. You may really understand management and technology, even better than the person you invest in - but even then, it is just an example, what we want to prove today is the mainstream of society, so even if you do, it will not help today's debate, we can't expect most of the investors in the world to be geniuses like you!

Even Peter Tiel, the well-known godfather of Silicon Valley and the head of PayPal-MAFIA, is already a big bull who has achieved countless successes in Silicon Valley. HE ALSO KNEW WHEN HE INVESTED IN FACEBOOK THAT HE COULDN'T DICTATE ZUCKERBERG!"

Chen Ming almost held back the unwillingness and disgust in his heart to say this.

Who wants to tout their opponent as a genius in a debate tournament? Isn't that a demoralization blow to their own side?

But reason tells Chen Ming: think with reason, not with emotion.

The scene of Bai Zhizhong's overturn two years ago is still vivid.

If he didn't make up this paragraph and killed the other party, in case Feng Jianxiong had to come up with real evidence to prove that he was indeed so awesome.

So, isn't he going to repeat the mistakes of Bai Zhizhong?

Therefore, it is better to take the initiative to admit that Feng Jianxiong is a genius, but at the same time emphasize that there is only one genius as good as Feng Jianxiong on this earth, so no matter how talented he is, it has nothing to do with the mainstream of society to be discussed today. Because Feng Jianxiong's success cannot be replicated.

However, the facts soon told Chen Ming that his boast was in vain.

Because this time, Feng Jianxiong did not intend to pretend to be a personal hero.

The tricks he used to deal with Bai Zhizhong two years ago, he didn't use it this time.

Therefore, Chen Mingbai boasted that Feng Jianxiong was a genius, and his morale was also deducted in vain.

Feng Jianxiong said with a smile: "Of course I'm not that good, and I also think that the other party's defense friend said that 'investors and bosses can't have professionals who know how to do it' is really a wise saying - unfortunately, it has nothing to do with today's debate."

Because, as I have already emphasized, what we say 'use suspicious people' does not include any interference, suspicion is just suspicion, as for specific things, we still 100% delegate authority to the founders and technical leaders. ”

This point of view really made Chen Ming a little stunned, he felt that the preparation in front seemed to be a little redundant, and it was like a fist with a charge of MAX, which suddenly hit the cotton.

It turned out that Feng Jianxiong was just planning to play a word game and sophistry? His 'suspicion' was only a mental suspicion and did not interfere with any actual action?

If this is the case, this kind of 'doubt' has really become immorally flawless-I doubt you, but I still let you do it, then what's wrong? Brother just thinks about doubts in his heart, and even the self-esteem of the employed person will not be hit in the slightest.

Chen Ming felt that his IQ had been humiliated, and he immediately argued: "It turns out that the 'suspicion' that the opponent's defense friend said was an idealistic 'thought criminal' from beginning to end?

If 'doubt' is only expressed in a person's inner thoughts and no action, then what is the point of discussion! No law or social morality will punish people's inner thoughts that are pure and have no external manifestations!"

However, Feng Jianxiong did not have the frustration that Chen Ming expected, he was still so calm: "I didn't say that there was no external performance—I just said, 'There is no interference, no restriction on the suspected person to do things'." These two are not the same. Please do not change the concept of the opponent. We suspect that people who invest in themselves can have other manifestations. ”

Chen Ming has completely lost his temper now.

Because with his social experience, he really can't imagine how to talk about specific operational topics in the future.

He could only lower his posture and ask in a tone of seeking advice: "Then I would like to ask, how do you express the 'suspicion' of 'not interfering in action and having other objective manifestations'?"

If this question is asked, it is destined to lose points. Because if Feng Jianxiong's follow-up answer is very ingenious, it can prove that Chen Ming's social experience is too shallow and his imagination is not rich enough. In a debate tournament, this is still a losing point.

But what can be done? Find all the other mouth-cannon men on the earth, unless it is to bring in Ma Feng's main business to make money and his sideline business. Otherwise, other people who are pure mouth-sellers will definitely not have Feng Jianxiong's experience.

Feng Jianxiong had no choice but to reluctantly help the primary school students improve their knowledge.

Actually, it's very simple - I'm glad to hear that the opposing debater has some insight and has learned about Peter Thiel and Zuckerberg for today's debate, so I'll use this example to illustrate:

OF COURSE, PETER THIEL WILL NOT INTERFERE WITH HOW ZUCKERBERG RUNS FACEBOOK, BUT I AM AFRAID THAT THE OTHER SIDE DOES NOT KNOW THAT IN ADDITION TO GIVING ZUCKERBERG $500,000 IN START-UP FUNDS, PETER TIL ALSO GAVE NO LESS THAN 20 OTHER PROJECTS IN THE SAME OR SIMILAR FIELDS IN THE SAME YEAR, ALTHOUGH NOT NECESSARILY MORE THAN ZUCKERBERG, BUT THE TOTAL AMOUNT ADDS UP TO NEARLY 10 MILLION DOLLARS. It's just that those success books often don't tell you the stories of the ones they smashed.

When I make investments, of course, I will not interfere with the operational and technical decisions of Mr. Liu or Mr. Xi back then. But I still have doubts, and the manifestation of this doubt in action is that I will not put my eggs in one basket, I will invest in some projects with similar categories. Even sometimes I know that only one of these projects is destined to survive at most – and of course, none of them will survive.

At most, I spend only one portion of my money that is not spent in vain, but I still have to spend it. This is the meaning of 'suspicion' in the employment of people in modern society, I will respect the other party's decision-making, and will be able to resist it, but I reserve the 'suspicion' that I believe he is very likely to fail, and give him the same treatment while giving him full autonomy, and would rather spend money in vain to increase the final success rate. ”

A few years later, those who give both Didi money and fast money. Isn't that what investors who give both Meituan money and Ele.me money think?

In the era of fierce competition in innovation, it is almost the norm for giants to stuff money into all promising innovators.

It's just that at the moment of 2009, it is not so tragic, after all, the pattern of BAT has just been formed, and everyone's investment is still "conducive to doing their own things", and they have not thought of "guarding against what others are going to do".

In other words, Tengyun in 09 will never give money to the founder of the new project because of the consideration of "I don't invest in this project, Ahri may vote".

Because we all need to focus on strengthening ourselves. The market is still very open, and the oligopoly pattern has not yet been finalized. If Tengyun fights with Ahri and burns his funds and potential, he may be profited by a third-party fourth-party fisherman.

However, in those years after the mobile Internet was thoroughly deepened, this kind of "defensive investment that would block the other party even if it is useless" was common, and anyone who had a little understanding of the investment circle could understand this form and the psychology behind it.

Because at that time, for Ahri Tengyun, there was no third-party enemy in the world to fight.

Therefore, when it comes to the understanding of the mentality of "out of suspicion, so all the people who seem to be promising in the same industry and field are throwing money again", no one in China at the moment will be more profound than Feng Jianxiong.

It is precisely because of this that he can say these words so naturally and so well.

Although the jump is a bit big, in the ears of the judges, they all feel that it is what it should be, that is Feng Jianxiong's real experience.

Several judges listened to his opinion and pondered there:

"Tut-tut, this insight is so high that I don't know where it is. Alas, it seems that two years later, he once again used his rich social experience and insight to beat the opponents of the students. ”

Of course, I have to admit that Feng Jianxiong's eloquence is still as good as ever, and if he relies on eloquence alone, he has a high probability of winning. It's just that his advantages in vision and experience are simply too strong for other college students. The debate of 'employing people without suspicion and doubting people without suspicion' seems to be not time-sensitive, and the requirements for insight and insight are not high. But this can be brutally broken by him to the current perspective, this person's ability to guide according to the situation is really unfathomable. ”