Chapter 125: There is nothing that cannot be killed

"I believe that the opponent must not know that within Tengyun Company, there are many studios engaged in internal R&D competition. They are doing this game and that game, and they are all responsible for the objective scientific research and development of 'first-level chaos'.

Of course, games may not sound very serious, but I give this example only because these examples are familiar to everyone, the products may have been played, and games are also objective scientific research results after all.

In addition to Tengyun Company, there are countless Internet companies and high-tech companies that have done this - according to the opponent's defense friend, as long as they are facing objective difficulties and fighting against the laws of nature, then they should not be 'used by suspicious people'?

Of course, we are not recommending unrestricted and unscrupulous internal competition, and if the artificial intelligence team with two technical routes like Du Niang's family wants to denigrate each other to the extent of exposing each other's ugliness, it is obviously a failure under the control of management.

What I want to say is that the biggest reason for all this is the blind self-confidence of human beings, which needs to be suppressed by 'suspicion'.

In the Level 2 Chaos realm, we are 'suspicious' because those who do things may really not be good enough, not as good as their peers.

In the realm of first-order chaos, we are 'suspicious' because many times modern engineers simply don't know what they don't know.

I don't know if you have heard Rumsfedel's famous words in an interview with CNN and reviewing the Iraq War: There-ere-something-e-kno-e-kno, There-ere-something-e-kno-e don't kno......"

Feng Jianxiong said the original text roughly quickly, and then quickly translated it into Chinese, after all, this is a Chinese debate competition.

Rumsfedel's remarks were awarded the "Ignorance Award" by the British media in the English-speaking circles that year, saying that Rumsfeld played Tai Chi and killed Saddam Hussein, and then vaguely shirked the responsibility for starting the war.

But in good conscience, the philosophy of these words is correct.

"There are things in this world that we know we know, and there are things we know we don't know, and that's nothing. But the point is, there are still things in this world that we don't know we don't know. That is, we don't understand these things, but we don't know that we don't understand them, and we think we do. ”

(Rash's original intention was to pretend that he did not know that Saddam Hussein did not hide nuclear weapons, and he thought that Saddam Hussein had hidden, so he killed him.) After the extermination, I realized that Saddam Hussein was innocent. Just use this sentence to prevaricate the reasons for the masses to start a war. )

After Feng Jianxiong finished quoting and translating, he immediately put the finishing touch:

"In the field of modern scientific research, even in the field of first-order chaotic systems that struggle with objective laws. Do you think that researchers who 'have an increasingly detailed division of labor' really know what they know and what they don't understand? No, they don't know. What's even more terrifying is that sometimes they don't know, not because they have bad character or bad morals.

It's entirely possible that they have good intentions and want to take shortcuts to serve the company, or simply because they think about the problems they may face and the difficulties they want to take easy, and then they do bad things. Therefore, 'employing people to be suspicious' is so important. And our 'doubt' here can still be manifested in not interfering with their specific work, fully respecting them, and giving full play to their creative talents. But at the same time, we will give scientific research competition, do not put all our eggs in the same basket, and use other studios and project teams to check and fill in the gaps, and encourage them if they do not.

I don't think this kind of system of checking and filling in the gaps will encourage you if you don't have anything to do with 'disrespecting' scientific researchers. On the contrary, we respect them and at the same time doubt them, and there is no contradiction in this.

Speaking of which, I can't help but think of an example of something I'm currently working on. Since 2007, since the revision of the new Patent Law, the Supreme People's Court has issued some corresponding interpretations, changing the validity of an invention patent application that 'after the examiner rejects the application and the applicant appeals to the reexamination board for rejudgment', from the original 'remand to the examiner for re-examination' to 'directly change the judgment and authorize'.

But it turns out that after a year or two, the legal risks behind this interpretation are very high. My supervisor, Professor Liu Yuanming, has been studying this issue in depth for the past two years, and has found some invention patents that should have been invalid because of this system. Recently, as a consultant and expert of the CNIPA, he has also been campaigning for and publishing academic monographs on special topics to draw attention to this issue.

In these cases, did the members of the State Reexamination Commission deliberately let go of those invalid patents? Aren't the experts of the Supreme People's Court's Legal Interpretation Office not enough to serve the country and the people? No, as some pure liberal arts students and doctors of law, the experts of the Legal Interpretation Office are ignorant of the degree of cutting-edge subdivision of modern science and technology. They didn't know they didn't understand, so they let the plausible things go.

Therefore, in the face of the rigorous field of natural sciences and the 'research and development work' of the first-class chaotic system, we must maintain the system of 'using people with suspicion and using people with suspicion' in order to achieve maximum economic and social benefits. Of course, the specific operation method of 'suspicion' I mentioned is flexible, and it is not limited to 'doubting' the character of others. More often than not, the other party can make mistakes just because he doesn't know his ignorance when his character and morality are flawless—my suspicions can save these mistakes!"

……

Chen Ming stared at the dog leash.

"Shhh...... Hiss Kokuichi!"

Feng Jianxiong was not interested in talking to him at all, "You fight yours, I fight mine, a water battle, a land battle." Then grab the turf, like a game of Go, and finally Sven Wen will win and lose.

Feng Jianxiong simply rushed to the position that seemed to be Chen Ming's home field, and then stepped on it to death, directly hanged and beat him, and ate the general.

Your resistance is just to show off "which is the mainstream of the first-level chaotic system or the second-level chaotic system"?

I'm sorry, it doesn't matter which one is dominant.

Because my brother has already argued that no matter what field you are in, you must "use people to be suspicious, and people who are suspicious should also be used".

At best, it's just the specific operation method of brother's "suspicion", which you can't think of, and you can't imagine.

But this can't be helped, Chen Ming is a senior freshman after all, all he has is eloquence, how can he compare with a guy like Feng Jianxiong who has both eloquence and experience?

People can always remain humble and not use authority to oppress others, and finally understate and seemingly inadvertently reveal that in fact, my brother's level is already a consultant expert at the level of the State General Administration.

It is not surprising that Chen Ming was beaten by a primary school student.

Of course, to be strict, the consultant expert is Feng Jianxiong's mentor Liu Yuanming.

But what is Liu Yuanming? He is just a professor at Jinling Normal University, a university whose law school level can only be ranked among the top 20 in the country.

How many people will truly believe that Liu Yuanming's academic achievements in the past two years are really the result of his sudden flash of inspiration and the explosion of his IQ? If you are really so awesome, before Feng Jianxiong came, your old boy had been a professor for ten years, right? Why don't you see your achievements?

In the domestic academic world, the tutor takes the student's results, so do you still need to think about it? Find a little brain, think about it with your knees, and know what's going on.

The judges and the audience in the venue are well aware of this.

And their awe for Feng Jianxiong was even stronger.

It is a person who does not rely on any academic background and discourse. It is completely 100% dependent on the IQ game, by breaking the loopholes in the new law that those legislative experts have come up with with exhaustive IQ, so as to firmly put their own mentor on top of the terrifying existence of some consultants and experts of the State General Administration!

This son is so terrifying!

As for what Feng Jianxiong said, whether it can be found out, no one doubts. Even if a few people are suspicious, if you look at Baidu on the spot, it should be said that you can find it on the Taoist and other papers, monographs and literature query agencies, and you will have all of them.

Feng Jianxiong's master's graduation project this semester, Liu Yuanming had already tailored it for him, is it to burst the bubble of the game between the Supreme People's Court and the State Intellectual Property Bureau.

Therefore, the small results of those series of papers have been published in top-level, at least dual-core law journals. Only the last few key nodes and the final conclusion have not yet been thrown.

Among them, there are already four papers in "Legal Research" and "Chinese Legal Science" signed by Feng Jianxiong himself as the first author.

This really made some of the students and audiences of the two universities who were studying for graduate school in the venue, and even the faculty and staff present, and the teachers and students of the famous local universities in Shandong Province ashamed.

"If a master's student is a master's student, he will have four "Legal Studies" as soon as he gets started, and if he is in our school, even if he does not have any years, the level and number of such papers can be directly evaluated as associate professors! No wonder people can graduate with a master's degree in one year, which is worth it and should be given. This is the strength of others.

However, Liu Yuanming also seems to be above board, and he is willing to let go of such a terrifying thesis machine, and he didn't think about putting it by his side to continue squeezing...... No, Liu Yuanming must also know his own catties, and he knows that his husband is not guilty of his crimes, and he can't control a big bull like Feng Jianxiong. People are willing to come to his graduate school, but they must not know how many relaxed conditions and benefits are promised behind it. ”

Everyone thought about it chaotically, and even the scene was a little noisy for a while, so that the CCTV crew had to temporarily use means to reduce noise, so as not to record the sound that should not be recorded, resulting in a bad broadcast effect in the end.

In contrast, the closing arguments and the judges' questions are more important?

Everyone knows that no matter what you say when you summarize it, the Wuhan University side has no chance.

In the last ten minutes of torment, Yu Meiqin cleanly completed the final blow, and then waited for the verdict to be announced.

"Now please take a break and wait for the jury to deliberate. The host said, and the noise in the venue was louder.

The little fan girl group who came to watch Feng Jianxiong from Jinling Normal University was ready to celebrate.