I have to admit that the quality of a random 211 university tutor to come up with a debate topic is definitely not as good as the carefully crafted and repeatedly balanced topics in the international college debate competition.

Since this self-proposition was used in this game between the Law School and the New Mission Academy, it is destined that the side of the New Mission School will naturally get a little cheaper. The proposition group will obviously be aware of this when it comes out, so it uses the method of "enhancing the openness of the debate" to bridge the imbalance between the pros and cons as much as possible.

This is easy to understand, because the more pure, theoretical, and definition-oriented the debate, once the pros and cons are unequal, and purely playing the word game of the Three Principles and Five Constants, it is easy to lead to the stronger the stronger, and the cheaper side to take advantage of. The more open the debate, the more room it can provide for the naturally inferior side to take a detour and resist from a few more angles.

The debate topic of "the pros and cons of free operation strategy for the prosperity and dissemination of Internet content" is undoubtedly very open and trendy.

And the more open the debate, because the more opportunities and detours there are for "taking care of the left and right", the more difficult it is to distinguish the winner from the winner in the "cross-questioning" session where the pace is not fast enough.

Because the cross-questioning session can only be directly asked by one party and answered directly by the other party, and cannot be cross-examined and cross-examined, when the definition systems of the two sides are inconsistent, it is easy to avoid the main question, forming an embarrassing situation that occupies the scene but does not occupy the argument.

Even if he is as strong as Feng Jianxiong, he did a good job of answering and answering three questions, and beat the second debate of the New Mission Academy to the point of defeat. also just earned all the points on the scene, and gained waves of shouts and cheers in the eyes of the onlookers. However, in the eyes of professional judges and moderators, the two sides are far from the level of a head-to-head confrontation of core views.

"The advantage is not the victory, and the only way to do it is to rely on the free debate session. After sitting back in his seat, Feng Jianxiong thought so.

Then, it was Chen Sicong who asked three questions on the law school's side, and then the other party also asked three questions in three arguments - of course, after Feng Jianxiong's sharp performance, they would definitely not pick Feng Jianxiong to ask, but would stare at Chen Sicong's soft underbelly.

Chen Sicong's three questions were discussed and formulated by Feng Jianxiong and Yu Meiqin before the competition, and the quality was quite sharp. It's a pity that the person who answered on the other side dodged, although the first question lost some scene points, but it also successfully deviated the question, so that Chen Sicong, who lacked the ability to adapt to the situation, had to temporarily modify the next two questions, and his combat effectiveness was greatly reduced.

In the end, the cross-questioning between the three debates of the two sides led to a slight advantage in the new mission and a slight advantage in recovering some scene points.

Before the free debate session began, the situation on the court was roughly like this: with Nick Shi's opening remarks setting the tone and Feng Jianxiong's Q&A, the law school has a firm foothold on the half of the debate topic of "free strategy is not conducive to content prosperity", and now has a clear advantage.

However, in terms of "the free strategy is conducive to the prosperity of content", the new mission institute has also unsurprisingly found a place and has a slight advantage.

Considering these two perspectives of the audience, the law school has a greater advantage.

"I now declare that the time for each side is five minutes for each side of the free debate. Teacher Liang, who presided over the competition, made an announcement, which made all the debaters nervous.

……

"May I ask the other side of the debate, since you have just admitted that the free strategy will lead to a large number of specific and subdivided content creation practitioners being squeezed out and having to do other work. Doesn't that mean that this tactic harms the cultural diversity of Internet content?"

Yu Meiqin, who has been playing soy sauce since the opening, stood up and talked eloquently as soon as possible. It is not surprising that the war was first encircled in the sub-field of "content prosperity," which is beneficial to law schools.

This is also the first time that Feng Jianxiong and Shi Nicole have seen Yu Meiqin speak on the field from the perspective of partners.

Yu Meiqin's shawl hair was pale golden in the sunlight that shone obliquely through the floor-to-ceiling windows.

When she speaks, the range of gestures is not large, but there is a kind of grace and magnificence that is both elegant and magnificent, just like Wang Yuyan in "Tianlong Babu" in "oral martial arts" and commenting on the general trend.

Lu Feng also held back for a long time, and he was also the strongest main force of the Xinchuan Academy, so he took this trick without giving up: "We just admitted that every market mechanism will squeeze out content that is less competitive under a specific operation strategy, but we don't think this kind of squeezing out must be cross-industry, or mainly cross-industry." ”

"The other side seems to be a little forgetful – we just gave an example. Yu Meiqin reminded the other party without hesitation.

Lu Feng was slightly stunned, and immediately tenaciously defended: "The other party's just mention of 'people who sell tea in QQ groups and Baidu Tieba are going to do telecom fraud because they are squeezed out', that is just a very few extreme examples. Those people are just marketing talents, so naturally they can only do another type of marketing work. And the providers of online literature and music are all cultural people, and even if they change careers, they are creating other more competitive cultural products, how can it be said that they are harming cultural diversity?"

Yu Meiqin smiled indifferently, brushed her sideburns, and moved her head slightly sideways, so that her eyes reflected a bright light, although she did not wear beautiful contact lenses.

I saw her lightly open her lips and break the other party's illusion: "Yes, then I'm afraid the following example will disappoint you - as we all know, the land of pigs is currently a relatively concentrated communication forum for domestic online literature creators, and there are many writers who can't make money and struggle to make food and clothing all year round. The example I'm going to give below is taken from a self-exposing post in the land of pigs.

There is a writer who has been writing novels on the XX Chinese Internet since last year, because his novels are too pirated, only 30 to 1 subscription ratio - although many well-known writers also adhere to the 30 to 1 genuine rate, but for niche content with only tens of millions of followers, it is obviously impossible to persevere.

Then, a while ago, the writer posted with his real name, saying that he changed careers to sell elderly health care products, and now his performance is good, he is alive and well, and he has also become the backbone of the internal training of the brand he endorses, and he has a lot of commissions. According to his disclosure, writing an online novel and tricking the elderly into selling health care products require exactly the same skills......"

"This can't be! Moderator, I question the veracity of the examples given by the opponent's defense friends. How can a cultured person who writes books, the skills required and the health product salesman who deceives the old man and the old lady, be compatible!"

Lu Feng's debating skills are still good, and his knowledge is quite extensive. However, the example given by the other party is really bizarre, and it is like a random fight, although there is some relevance if you look closely.

This made him always calm, and he had to be filed, so that he lost his temper slightly.

Teacher Liang was also a little unbelievable, and reminded: "The opposing side of the four arguments, please pay attention to your words, and don't give unfounded examples." ”

"I can, of course, give the source of the evidence, and I have dictated it very clearly just now – I request that it be submitted to the jury for third party inspection. Yu Meiqin fluttered from the top of the pile of papers on her desk, took out a sheet, waved it, and placed it on the corner of the table.

Naturally, some members of the jury came out of the crowd, took away the paper, and cross-examined it on the spot. However, these checks will not affect the progress of the game.

After all, the debate competition is not a court trial, and the importance attached to the work of evidence cross-examination is still relatively light.

Yu Meiqin continued as if no one was around: "The opponent's defense friend thinks that the skills required to write cool essays are different from those for selling health products, which is precisely a misunderstanding. The vast majority of online novels have no literary and artistic qualities, only stories, and sell some cool. In particular, the protagonist created by the writer has a lower IQ than the reader, but is still successful, so that the reader can get a sense of substitution, and pay for the genuine version on impulse.

In this case, the writer who changed careers pulled a retired worker whose children were quite wealthy and spent 300,000 yuan on the health care products he was selling. After the old man's children exposed the scam of the medical effect of health care products, the old man still scolded his children with his neck:

Even if it has no effect, I am willing to pay the 300,000 yuan, what's wrong? I have been a worker all my life, I have no cultural status, and now I have bought 300,000 yuan of health care products, and the manufacturer treats me as a typical advanced person, and asks me to give a speech on stage, report my experience after taking health care products, and ask a university professor to sit down and listen to me as a retired worker! I have a face! My life is worth living! 300,000 yuan is left for you to buy a house, can I get such an opportunity for university professors to listen to my lectures until I die?

What is an online novel? In essence, it is to put the author himself in an unhappy, mentally retarded position, and then make the reader feel that his IQ is higher than that of the protagonist, and the protagonist is awesome, and if I cross into it, it will definitely be even more awesome. Both of them are cheating money with the superiority of consumers' IQ, and of course the skills are the same!"

Lu Feng was a little stunned, still digesting this case. Fortunately, Liu Jinhui found that the signs were wrong, and immediately took some defense statements prepared before the game to plug the leak.

Although, the situation is slightly different, resulting in a somewhat blunt plugging.

Those who write novels that are purely cool and sell nothing can provide much cultural diversity, they are worthless and spicy...... Codeword slaves. As the famous junk fast food writer and director Guo Xiaosi said, 'Even if I don't make 'Little Times', no one will watch Jia Zhangke's movie'.

What the other party said just now is because of piracy...... Well, it should be said that it is the free operation strategy of the Internet, and the person who was forced away was originally a codeword slave like Guo Xiaosi who looked at money. Writers with ideals and ambitions will not give up their life pursuits just because they have no money to make. Just as Jia Zhangke has never made any money, isn't he still making literary films?"

"Student Liu, it's not good to casually say that others are garbage. Feng Jianxiong saw that Yu Meiqin was a little tired and needed to change his breath, so he took advantage of this juncture to stand up and gently and skillfully took over the other party's firepower.

As soon as he opened his mouth, he was snickered at by many of the girls in the room, even though he didn't think he was funny at all.

"People who have the backbone and can stick to their ambitions are a minority after all. More creators are wandering away from people who have some talent and possibility, but also need to eat. We have said enough about talented people who have the potential to create cultural diversity being squeezed out of free strategies.

But for the sake of your unbelief, I can summarize it with another global analogy.

As we all know, adult men are a relatively calm group, they like to look at the parameters and compare prices when buying things online, and 'cut all the intermediate links, no middlemen make the difference' - so over time, the male e-commerce companies that do 3C electronic products have been losing money all year round and losing talent. A large number of marketing planning talents from Jingdong and Zhongguancun Online have flowed to Taobao, which sells clothes. A large number of code farmers flow to be the king of mentally handicapped games...... Oh no, I mean...... Well, I'm talking about the Dazzling Dance Troupe's Internet companies that cheat elementary school students out of money.

In the end, adult men are unwilling to customize services for their experience because of their calmness and treachery, and all Internet marketing practitioners turn to selling health care products to cheat their parents' money, or go to Taobao to cheat their wives' money, or go to XX to cheat their sons' money.

In this case, there is nothing wrong with men, they are just calm by nature, which is an inevitable tragedy of the 'commons effect', and no one can make a set of rules that every man must be impulsive several times a year.

However, in the field of the Internet content industry, we obviously have a set of copyright protection and fee collection systems to avoid this commons effect, but if we don't use it, it will be a man-made disaster.

If there is pirated and malicious free content that grabs traffic, it leads to content that caters to certain user groups that are calm and have strong self-control, because their user base is not afraid of trouble and can take the time to find pirated resources and thus not give money. The other type of content that 'caters to impulsive, hot-blooded, and poor self-control' people is because users pay money as soon as their brains are hot, and they don't want to waste time looking for pirated resources-

In the long run, how will the Internet content industry develop, and do we still use it to predict? It must be that everyone writes about those who cater to impulsiveness and poor self-control, and the cultural desert will not soon come?

Why are there so many special forces novels on the Internet, don't you reflect on them? When you look at the major novel websites, don't your conscience hurt?"