"May I ask the opponent of the debate, do you agree with the judgment that if the content product is free, then those who originally relied on the content publication fee to support themselves will be engaged in other industries instead? Please answer this question carefully, and if you disagree, please say what you think is a possible way out: will those people sit and wait to starve to death, or what?"

Feng Jianxiong Zhizhu asked his first question in his hand.

The second argument of the positive side was still immersed in the frustration caused by feeding the dog three consecutive questions. Now I'm barely trying to concentrate, but I feel awkward when I listen to it.

"This is a serious guiding question, the style of play is too domineering, right?

And, according to the classical rules, "if" is one question, and "why" is another.

"Dear moderator, I object to the other person's inducing questioning! He has no right to predict 'how I will respond if I answer' before I answer, and these should be two questions. ”

Teacher Liang, who was standing behind the big podium, also twisted his eyebrows and thought about it, feeling that these words were a bit of a sideline and difficult to decide. So he inquired and asked Feng Jianxiong:

"Opponent and second debater, please pay attention to the way you ask questions. Do you have anything to say about the appeal of the second argument?"

Unexpectedly, Feng Jianxiong didn't care, and said directly: "Yes, I can adjust my question." Then I'll take the 'please explain why' half of the sentence – for now, just answer 'do you agree'. ”

It's just one of his tactics.

"You ......" After thinking about it, he found that he was still as disgusting as swallowing a fly.

He still only used the other party's opportunity to ask a question, and the other party blatantly told him that if you answered no, how would my brother entertain you next.

It's a threat, a sideline, and it's in line with the rules of the game.

"If I don't, how can I justify it? It seems unlikely, who would wait to starve to death? Forget it...... I really can't think of it, so I'll answer yes. After agreeing with the other party's assumptions, the other party can't ask me to explain the 'why', let alone explain it pointlessly.

However, if I answered 'yes', the next question from the other party's position is to continue to deduce the ...... in the direction that the free policy will have a crowding out effect on some Internet content providers?

hesitated for more than ten seconds, until he was urged by the host Mr. Liang once, and then he hurriedly replied: "I agree with what you just said...... Well, that's the point of view, after the content is free, the practitioner will change careers. But...... But ......"

He "but" twice, couldn't say anything else, and when he was anxious, he felt his left hand being lightly poked by his teammates.

He was like a drowning man who had caught a life-saving straw, and with the rest of his eyes, it turned out to be his teammate and fourth debater Lu Feng who saved the scene and stuffed a small note to him.

He didn't even think about it, so he picked up the note and read it down the "but".

"But...... I would like to warn the other side that the crowding out effect of this practitioner cannot be simply and crudely deduced as 'free strategies are harmful to the prosperity of Internet content'. The theory of socialist market economy tells us that it is just an optimal reallocation of resources, and those who are squeezed out will create more useful content and value in other fields. ”

Although it was stumbling, the question was finally answered, and it more or less used a bit of "one step forward and active defense" posture to block the opponent's most likely attack point.

However, in the eyes of ordinary audiences, all this is not very exciting.

They only see the positive side eating ugly and trying to avoid being questioned by the opposite side about their weakness.

"Wow! It's another clean way to force the other party to directly admit his point of view? Classmate Feng is so slippery with this move, this is how he dealt with Qin Mingren, the main force of the Academy of Mathematical Sciences, in the last game. A couple of law school girls thought.

Yu Meiqin, who was still in the cold bench soy sauce time, also turned up slightly at the corners of her mouth when she saw this: "Although classmate Feng is a little suspicious of using the rules to rub the ball, he completely suppressed the other party in his aura." The other party not only admitted it directly, but also hesitated for more than ten seconds. It is enough for the judges and the host to see clearly that they were forced to exhaust all possibilities before admitting it. ”

After listening to the whispers in the audience, several judges in this scene had another scale in their hearts: "It's not exactly the same, this time it's inducing deterrence after all." But the questioner threatens the other person, 'If you don't answer how, I'll ask how I will ask,' and the answerer threatens 'I know how you might ask, but I'm prepared, please don't ask that,' are completely different aura. ”

This is very easy to understand, just like the same threat, if it is a threat from someone with a knife: If you don't leave to buy road money, you will be chopped up, then it is naturally very domineering.

But if the robbed person threats: I have a knife! Don't come here! I will really use a knife!

How do you look at it, it looks like a strong outsider.

"Oh? The opponent's defense friend actually thinks that 'the people who are squeezed out are the optimal reallocation of human resources in the market economy'? This interpretation is very unexpected to me. You seem to think you've guessed what I'm trying to ask in the second question—okay, I'll change the question for a while. ”

Seeing that his question was accepted by the other party, Feng Jianxiong was still very calm, he thought about it, took out a form from the pile of evidence materials on the table, and asked neatly:

"I have a statistical table here, the data is absolutely true, it reflects the statistics of Internet marketing practitioners in a county named An-Xi in Fujian Province in recent years. The sources of the data include the public security network supervision department, the QQIP monitoring data from Tengyun Company, and the data of local mobile companies.

According to this table, it can be seen that from 03 to this year, the number of people engaged in Internet marketing in AX County is 14000~17000 people, 03 years, more than 90% of the employees of the working mode, is in the major QQ groups in the mass message to promote Tieguanyin, 04 since also joined the Baidu post bar sales channel.

But since this year, because of the disgust of netizens to the saturated marketing bombardment of Tieguanyin, as well as the banning and rectification of Tengyun and Baidu, the number of people who sell Tieguanyin has dropped to less than 60%, and there is a trend of continuous decline year after year - and it is the same group of people who have been squeezed out, according to the monitoring of mobile companies, who have embarked on the road of telecom fraud - I want to ask the other side of the debate, do you think that the crowding out of industry practitioners is also 'the optimization and reallocation of human resources in the market economy'?"

When Feng Jianxiong threw out this brain-clear example, everyone in the audience was shocked.

This is a phenomenon that all people who use QQ and mobile phones will be imperceptibly exposed to in their lives, but no one has ever thought about the correlation behind all this.

So much so that when the big data behind these facts was revealed, everyone was incredulous and terrifying.

"Huh? The group of people who sell tea in the QQ group is the same group of people who won the lottery and SMS scams on their mobile phones? It's unlikely!"

"But it seems that the other party has really done a very detailed investigation, so I really didn't expect it. This perspective of looking at the problem is too brainy...... How did you give this student the inspiration to associate these two seemingly unrelated things with everything?"

Looking at the reaction of the new mission to this question, there is no doubt that everyone is directly stupid.

Just judging whether the factual part of what Feng Jianxiong said was true was enough for them to figure it out for a few minutes before they came back to their senses.

"Please answer the second argument!" Seeing that the debaters of the New Mission Academy whispered there and seemed to have forgotten the rules of the game, it was easy for the tournament host to bring himself back to his senses with his professionalism, and immediately sent out a reminder.

On the side of the new mission, Lu Feng, the fourth debater, protested: "We ...... We question the factual arguments provided by the other side themselves, which we believe are not true! If it is not true, the question cannot be answered. ”

Teacher Liang turned to Feng Jianxiong and asked, "Do you have any explanation for the other party's question?"

Feng Jianxiong said very calmly: "Please note that the opponent's defense friend is now a cross-question session, not a free debate session, and you only have the right to answer my questions, not the right to directly cross-question." If you have doubts about the veracity of the factual evidence, you can add the premise 'if this evidence is true' before answering.

As for me, I can vouch for that all the data on the factual arguments I have just mentioned are from authoritative statistics and are available for verification during the free debate session or after the competition. If the source is false, we are willing to bear the consequences of losing the game. ”

Feng Jianxiong said so, and the teammates of the Xinchuan Academy had nothing else to do except look at each other.

This kind of epic span of brain hole correlation is really incredible.

After hesitating again and again, the second debate of the new mission could only endure the disgust like swallowing a fly and admitted: "What if...... I mean, if the factual premise of this question is partially true, we don't think that this situation can be counted as the 'optimal reallocation of human resources by the hand of the market' that we just mentioned. ”

When they said this, their eyes were still full of resentment, "You wait! When it comes to free debate, you must come up with evidence to prove that the facts and premises you cite are true! This is not the end of the matter!"

Although the opponent was very depressed, Feng Jianxiong, who had won a wave of forced debate, did not see any joy at all.

"It's a pity that wasting Lao Tzu's opportunity to ask questions, it seems that the only way to drag the Armageddon to the free debate link is to drag it out. ”

When he pondered to himself, he couldn't help but think of the lines in the plot of Stephen Chow's movie "Domestic 007", in which "The Golden Gunman" killed "002": "Grass! Waste my bullet!"