Even if a person who studies law and media studies has only been in college for a month, there is a big difference in thinking patterns and brain perspectives.

Those who study the Fa pay attention to finesse, carefully pick out the words and sentences, and do not speak nonsense.

Those who study media are knowledgeable. Even if he found that he had been caught, he immediately diverted the topic, found a new point of attack, and finally tried to make a breakthrough from an angle that no one else had ever heard of.

To use an inappropriate analogy, it is, "You reason with me, and I talk to you about the law." You tell me the law, and I play hooligan with you. When you play hooligan with me, my brother will reason with you. ”

Wrap around and around people to be dizzy.

Compared with the opening statement of the new mission, Shi Nicole has a lot less angle to dabble, and it also lacks the rigor of refuting every point mentioned by Liu Jinhui -

There is no way, after all, her opening speech is prepared before the game, and it is very difficult to change on the spot. Many angles that I didn't expect before the game can only say two words temporarily.

"Our view is that the free strategy is not only detrimental to the prosperity of Internet content, but it is also detrimental to the distribution of content.

Let's look at the point of 'prosperity' first - first of all, our definition of 'prosperity' must include cultural diversity, not just look at the output value of a content industry, and not only look at the monetary theory.

Under this premise, the reason why we think that the free strategy is harmful is because the free strategy will first hurt the creative enthusiasm of a considerable number of creators, and it is obvious that many creators who have no financial resources will give up creating content as a business.

Even if, as the opponent argued, it is possible to 'operate the platform to buy the content for free and provide it for consumers to use for free to win traffic', but because this model cares about the click-through rate of consumers, and it must be 100% click-through in the operation process, it is destined that this model cannot be applied to most of the niche content that is narrow and heavy, and can only be applied to the popular and cool content of 'large quantities and full of control'.

At the same time, because it is impossible to distinguish between 'small but strong demand' and 'mass but weak demand', it will also lead to content platforms being data-only when purchasing content, which will lead to various data frauds including SEO and even targeted data swiping. To sum up, we believe that the free strategy is certainly not conducive to the overall prosperity of Internet content.

Looking at the field of communication, whether the free strategy of the Internet is conducive to the dissemination of content should not only look at the breadth and quantity of communication, but also take into account the 'quality' of communication. This quality can also include metrics such as whether users spend less time and effort finding their content than in the other mode, and whether users spend less time being disturbed and unpleasant by spam, which we will discuss in more detail later......

Shi Nicole sprinkled for three minutes, and the main point of attack on the law school's side was quite perfect.

As for the chicken bits and pieces mentioned by the new mission, they have finally been able to answer all questions on the spot, although the theory is not necessarily solid.

It's a pity that because she was poor since she was a child, she has never been to KTV once, and she has never talked about the microphone of the recording, so the voice control is not very good when she speaks.

There are several places where the breath is not usually easy to detect is not properly controlled, and it sounds a little shaky after being picked up by the microphone, giving people a pitiful feeling.

Several times, because the microphone was facing the wrong direction, there was a sharp whistling sound.

But in any case, in the eyes of the melon-eating masses, these are not great mistakes. The two girls squirted softly and cutely, which was enough to make the adrenaline rush of the boys, who accounted for more than one-third of the audience, and shouted that today's game is really worth watching.

"It can be regarded as a good bet, and the new mission is slightly stronger. After all, the aura connection is very stable, and the posture and tone are good, that is, the reasonable part is almost the same. The girl in law school was so bad that she was a child. "The teacher Liang from the Faculty of Arts, who presided over the competition, judged in his heart. His views also somewhat represent the attitude of the group of judges on the school team.

Shi Nicole also roughly figured out the psychology of the host teacher and the jury, and almost cried when she sat down.

Feng Jianxiong comforted just right: "Don't worry, don't you just haven't used recording and broadcasting equipment, and it's not that you can't do it." If you don't dislike it, next time you ask you to sing two KTV exercises, and you will be familiar. ”

"Hmm......" Shi Nicole wiped her eyes, her face was slightly red, and she smiled shyly, her voice was very soft and thin.

In Feng Jianxiong's heart, he was even more disdainful of the new mission team's painstaking arrangement of the school station recording and broadcasting.

What kind of ability is it to rely on these off-the-field technical means to win some small advantages?

He was disdainful, and he inevitably wandered for a few seconds, but he didn't hear that Mr. Liang, who was hosting, had announced that he had entered the cross-questioning session.

It was the question of the second debate of the New Mission Academy that woke him up.

"The second argument of the opposing side, just now you repeatedly emphasized in your opening speech that 'not giving monetary incentives to creators will hurt their enthusiasm for creation', so do you think that 'monetary rewards' is a norm in the history of human creation?"

This question is obviously a dig into the debate between the two sides that "should manuscript fees exist forever, or only at a certain stage of human history".

Clarification of this question is a great way to prove whether the stimulus effect of money on cultural diversity is universal, which is very important.

After listening to it, all the judges can basically judge that this question is 100% prepared before the opening, and there is no improvisation component.

The test is the breadth of insight of the opposing party, and the difficulty mainly lies in whether or not it knows the relevant historical materials for factual judgment. If you can tell the historical data and interpret it in your own way, you will not be afraid in theory.

"The knowledge points are very rare, and people who study law should not pick out such a detailed knowledge reserve of human cultural history. The host, Mr. Liang, thought so and was not very optimistic about Feng Jianxiong.

Shi Nicole and Chen Sicong were also a little at a loss, because they did not prepare so sufficient argument materials in their pre-match preparations.

In fact, it is unlikely that anyone will be preparing for a debate tournament to cover all the historical background knowledge that the opponent may cite.

Because human beings can only guess what theoretical system the other party may use to argue, but it is impossible to guess what specific examples the other side will give.

Therefore, the audience's reaction to this question was mainly confused, and they couldn't even understand what the questioner wanted to ask.

"I don't know what I'm asking, but I feel so good. Some melon-eating girls whispered.

Feng Jianxiong was very steady, and after the other party finished saying the question, he thought for five seconds, and let the melon-eating crowd whisper and react for five seconds before speaking.

"If I guessed correctly, the opponent wanted to hear me answer, 'Intellectual property rights should be protected, both ancient and modern, both Chinese and foreign.'" But unfortunately, I don't answer that – I admit that intellectual property is not and should not be a concept that spans the history of mankind. In the same way, giving content creators a fee, royalties, or other form of remuneration is not and should not be an eternal rule.

But this is not naturally the same as the first part of today's debate, and even without the existence of the form of manuscript fees, the business model of 'charging consumers' can still have a positive effect on the prosperity of content. ”

Feng Jianxiong's answer was very fine and very accurate, and it can be described as watertight.

Unexpectedly, the second argument of the positive side was slightly suffocated, and I didn't know how to deal with it, or I didn't know how to ask the next question.

"I ...... Why don't Nima play according to the routine! Aren't you studying law? Shouldn't you stick to the sacred viewpoint of intellectual property protection from the perspective of law students' thinking?"

This is the inner activity of the two arguments at this moment.

This boy was originally the weakest link among the four members of the New Missionary Academy - generally speaking, the weakest link of the main debate team would be placed in the first or second debate.

The reason is very simple, that is, the first and second arguments of the positive side are easy to prepare routines in advance, and the improvisation attribute required is relatively low. The opening statement of the positive side can be written 100% before the game, and the first three questions can also be arranged in advance.

The first debate on the side of the new mission is a girl with the best quality in the whole team's manners, image, voice and body language, so the weakest one is put in the second debate.

Originally, according to the analysis of his teammates, he only needed to set up a series of three questions, and he picked the problems that were the most difficult to jump out of the pit due to the breadth of thinking in the law school.

He was also ready to ask immediately after Feng Jianxiong jumped into the pit, "Then how do you explain these XXX counterexamples......

Who knows, Feng Jianxiong chose to admit directly from the perspective that they felt was the most unlikely to admit - of course, it was an acknowledgment after secondary interpretation and elaboration.

It's hard.

I don't need the second question at all.

"What should I do? Or let him explain why he admitted it? He should just be lying to us, but he can't 'know what it is and why it is', right?"

Uh-huh, ah-hmm, a few seconds later, the two sides who didn't want to lose more points hurriedly made this decision.

"Since the opposing side argues that 'intellectual property rights and copyright remuneration' are only products of a certain stage of human society, then I would like to ask: what specific stages of human history do you think they should exist in?"

As soon as this question was asked, Liu Jinhui, the first debater, and Lu Feng, the fourth debater, both shook their heads secretly, saying in their hearts that the weakest link of our team really lacks the ability to improvise.

This kind of questioning is purely to examine the other party's knowledge and critical thinking ability, and at most make the other party embarrassed when the other party does not match the preface and cannot justify himself.

But the problem is that even if Feng's elaboration of the second answer does not fit the conclusion of the first answer, this kind of question cannot make any attack on the core argument of the law school.

This is a waste of valuable cross-questioning opportunities – in a debate tournament, each side has only two cross-questions for a total of 6 questions.

However, compared with the nervousness of professionals, the state of the melon-eating masses is still unclear.

They don't look that far ahead, and they don't care about the probative relationship between the Q&A and the core argument. All they know is that this question seems to be easy to ask, but the answer is very cumbersome, and it is easy to finish if you are not careful.

Feng Jianxiong naturally didn't even want to give the impression points on these scenes to the other party.