"Intellectual property rights and copyright income are only the products of the development of human society and science and technology to a certain stage, this assertion is obvious - in the era when there was no printing press, according to the research of ancient records, we can see that both Chinese and foreign ancients did not have the habit of giving article creators 'royalties'.

A literati of the Han Dynasty, Wei, Jin, Southern and Northern Dynasties wrote a book, which was copied by others, and could be copied as long as it was borrowed. Book sellers also never think only about the labor costs of paper, pen and ink, and copying, and do not consider royalty expenses. The same was true of the European priests of the same period or the Middle Eastern Ahong to spread the scriptures and translate them.

In general, it is because in those eras, in the whole process of completing the service of knowledge dissemination, 'creation' was not the most scarce link, and the cost of copying a book into 10,000 copies was much higher than that of creation, so the cost of creation was ignored. It was only after Bi Sheng and Gutenberg that the printing press made the cost of reproduction so much that creation became the most scarce link in the process of knowledge dissemination, and human law invented the concepts of 'copyright' and 'royalties' to promote creativity.

In the future, with the explosion of spam information, the worthlessness of some consultations, and even more likely readers, more and more narcissistic, more and more unwilling to look at authority because of the flattening of the Internet, and even the confusion between readers and authors. It is entirely possible that the link of 'creation' will become the most scarce link in the service chain of knowledge from the human brain to the human brain, and it is entirely possible that the basis for the legal protection of creation will gradually become weaker - Marx tells us that the value of a person has 'almost' nothing to do with the use value he can provide, but mainly has to do with the scarcity or irreplaceability of the person. ”

Feng Jianxiong's last sentence is very flogging, although he has falsified Marx's original words.

Marx only said that things that are not scarce are cheap, but he did not say that people who are not scarce are not valuable.

But Feng Jianxiong changed like this, but his combat effectiveness was bursting, and he had a sense of provocation from a big troll.

In addition, it was a cross-question session, and every opportunity to alternate speaks was precious, and he was not afraid that the other party would waste the third question on correcting these innocuous words—he knew that the debater would not do that.

If it was in a free debate, he would never have played such a small debate skill.

The audience either applauded, or chewed carefully, reflecting on his words, and felt that their brains were open, as if they had read a "Devil's Economics" with a strange angle.

"Wow~ It looks like the opposing side is arguing twice...... Well, Feng Jianxiong is very knowledgeable, and it is not easy to be able to cite such a case-based analysis question raised by the other party. We can also note that with the further popularization of Internet consultation, the knowledge of new students is really getting wider and wider year by year. Ding Lihui, the female anchor of the school station, also lost no time in interspersing a few comments.

The audience's reaction made the questioner even more shaken.

The Q&A outline in his hand can't organize a rhythm that echoes back and forth at all, and each question can only fight independently.

He gritted his teeth and decided to take a risky path to the dark.

Use your last opportunity to ask questions to bet on the other party's knowledge and on individual counterexamples in the other party's previous answer.

People who practice law are good at value judgment.

People who engage in media are good at judging facts.

This iron rule was repeatedly instilled in them by the tutors here in the new mission academy before the game.

Therefore, the instruction they get has always been, "If the construction of a theoretical system can't defeat the people in law school, then give strange and crooked facts and counterexamples, and fish in troubled waters." ”

"The opponent's defense friend just talked about Yan Yan and arbitrarily said that 'the ancients before the invention of printing technology did not have the concept of royalties or manuscript fees', then I would like to ask the opponent's defense friend, Wang Anshi of the Northern Song Dynasty mentioned a few anecdotes in the preface of the "Linchuan Collection", saying that in the early years, a colleague begged for this book to be copied and disseminated, and wanted to give a 'moistening pen', which was fixed by him.

Many historical sources that study the history of the Renaissance today also mention that long before Gutenberg invented modern printing in the West, the Medici lords of Florence paid for the anthologies/collections of works by artists such as Botticelli. How do you explain the existence of these two kinds of 'manuscript fees'? Isn't this obviously contrary to what you just asserted?"

Facing the pig teammates who were showing off their knowledge, the faces of the two awesome players in the new mission academy turned completely black.

Liu Jinhui complained inwardly: "Even if it is proved that the other party answered the question incorrectly, what then? This is simply working hard for the other party's debate! This guy will definitely not let him play in the next game! If we win, there will be a next time." However, this question is very tricky, and the other party must have never heard of these examples, and it is not easy to distinguish them. Let's earn impression points. ”

Lu Feng secretly thought to himself: "Sure enough, this kind of miscellaneous family who only has extensive knowledge and a theoretical system but is not rigorous enough should not be put in the debate team at all." This kind of person will only find tricky angles in judging facts that no one else has heard of, and once the other party has seen a lot of knowledge, it will simply be a send-off! It is a pity that this kind of person is the most common person in our media business. ”

It's a pity that Liu Jinhui and Lu Feng were about to be disappointed immediately.

Because they can't even get the opportunity to "even prove that the other party answers wrong, it won't help".

Feng Jianxiong didn't even want to lose to the other party like the effect of the game. He's just that domineering.

"You say that the money is the remuneration of the author, and not to mention whether these two things are true or not—let's assume that what you say is true. The aristocracy rewarded art creators, which was a popular thing since ancient times, but this has nothing to do with remuneration.

When Byron wrote a poem, the Duke of Edinburgh rewarded him with £1,000 – it cost £160 to buy a villa in Fontainebleau at the time – but this money was a proper patronage of the arts, and had nothing to do with the cost of the manuscript, and the Duke of Edinburgh never intended to publish Byron's poems for profit. The Medici family sponsored the Three Masters of the Renaissance, not for publication. They paid Botticelli the same thing that Lorenzo Medici paid Michelangelo to carve a statue of himself for collection.

As for the ancient Chinese polishing and brushing, it is not the manuscript fee, it is the remuneration for the labor of making the original calligraphy and painting when asking for 'paintings and ink treasures'. In other words, when the buyer gives money, he does not want the 'copyright' but only the 'authenticity' itself -- people who go to Sotheby's auction house today to buy a famous painting often pay tens of millions of dollars, but what they fancy is the 'copyright' of the painting? Of course not! What they look for is the ownership of the property right of the original painting!

Therefore, to sum up, the counter-example that the opponent's defense friend tried to cite is precisely a bunch of nonsense. They don't even understand the basic concept of "manuscript fee" as a kind of remuneration that is bundled with the reproduction and sale of publications. ”

Actually, Feng Jianxiong didn't want to do this either.

Because of these three sets of questions and answers, the debate questions have been crooked to the point of nowhere.

But because it was the other party who took the initiative to ask the question, he also had to answer.

Even if it is a thousand miles off topic, the host will only blame the positive side for asking badly.

"Just kidding, I really think that if you are engaged in the media and have a wide range of knowledge, you can fight a war of examples? Brother has 15 years more knowledge than you, and later generations have forced people to show off their knowledge to see more, which onion are you? There are also a lot of 'knowledge paid' self-media bombardments, and a dog on the road can talk about "A Brief History of the Future" and "A Brief History of Mankind". A group of people who have never even used Baidu Encyclopedia and Baidu know about it, are fighting a battle with my brother? Isn't this looking for death!"

Feng Jianxiong thought so disdainfully.

At the same time, the audience who watched the excitement did not understand the doorway, they did not realize that both sides were off topic - this digression was to blame on the party who asked the question, and it was he who asked the off-topic, which caused the person who answered to follow the off-topic.

The people who ate melons only saw Feng Jianxiong slapping his face and beating him repeatedly.

Some of the girls in the new academy gradually turned into fan girls unconsciously: "The second debater in this law school is so profound, how can you know everything? It seems that our academy must adjust its tactics, and we must not compare our knowledge with the other party and collide with the muzzle of the gun." ”

There are also boys who whispered worriedly: "The three questions just now, it is estimated that they were also because the previous questions did not achieve their goals, and they couldn't save face, so they ended up trapping themselves." ”

"IT'S SO CRUEL, IT'S LIKE FALLING DIRECTLY INTO A TRAP FULL OF BROKEN GLASS WITH BAMBOO STICKS, AND I WANT XIAN AND WANT SI. ”

The debaters of the new mission academy on the field also listened to it, and their faces were not very good-looking. exchanged words of mutual affection.

The content is nothing more than "don't ask this second debate in the next round of questions, stare at the other side of the third debate!" or "drop all the arguments and materials that are used to fight with the other side and compare historical facts!" ”

Since the start of the competition, Yu Meiqin, who has been sitting on the cold bench of the fourth debate and playing soy sauce, saw such a stinky face of the opposite team, Rao is her temperament is cold and noble, and she can't help but be a little funny.

"The cross-questioning argument is like this, and it's simply - it's just digging a hole, full of expectations for Feng to jump down. As a result, the first question, classmate Feng decisively dodged and didn't jump. On the other side, he suspected that classmate Feng was trying his luck to dodge, and he didn't really see through the conspiracy behind it, and then stupidly used the second question to confirm 'how did you hide and not jump'.

As a result, after three consecutive questions, he became a brother and sister to practice feeding moves, and he became a personal performance time for Jianxiong to show off his knowledge...... Alas, can the on-the-spot judgment of the second debate of this new mission be a little more funny?"

In fact, the second argument of the new mission is not very funny, otherwise the new mission will not let him make up the number in the mall.

It's just that Yu Meiqin's level and requirements are higher, so this degree of misjudgment is already "teasing" in her eyes, which is appropriate.

Feng Jianxiong himself may be the calmest one on the field at this moment.

"The 'performance moment' of my three questions is very cool, but it will definitely bring a sequelae, that is, when the other party asks questions for a while, he will definitely choose Chen Sicong's fish belly, and he will not touch my hard bones again. I have to make good use of my own three questions and first completely determine the overall situation. Just earning scene points in the eyes of the layman, no matter how much it is, it is not decisive. ”

After admonishing himself like this, Feng Jianxiong completely entered a state of emptiness.

He took a deep breath and immediately started his sharp counterattack after the moderator, Mr. Liang, announced the exchange of questions.

"I also ask the other party for the second defense......"