It is common to say that when someone is introduced in newspapers or at conferences, or when the title is printed on a business card, it is said that they enjoy ****** special allowance, and even at the memorial service. Pen ~ fun ~ pavilion www.biquge.info

This "allowance" was implemented more than 20 years ago, when intellectuals were generally treated and living in poverty, so allowances were issued to some elite talents, which meant attaching importance to knowledge and talents, and was later continued.

I don't want this to make some people use it as a lifelong boasting capital. At every turn, "I enjoy ****** allowance" (similar to "enjoy ministerial-level medical treatment" and so on).

It's a small thing, but it's about value orientation and social ethos.

What is a stipend?

Under normal circumstances, a person with self-esteem rarely asks for subsidies, and if he really takes subsidies from others or the government, he will be apprehensive, keep a low profile, and work harder.

Now it's the other way around, and the "allowance" is on the lips, and the business card is printed and displayed in the newspaper, which shows how shallow it is.

This phenomenon is more common in the liberal arts than in the sciences, and the calligraphy and painting circles are the most important.

The media is also ignorant and follows the praise.

Just like a certain level of chief, eating a small stove in the unit and going out to take a small car, this is a kind of life and work treatment.

If every time you have a meeting or print a business card, you have to say: enjoy the small stove and the car, what kind of system is this, is he still a chief?

I remember that a few years ago, a university professor wrote a book manuscript and submitted it to a publishing house, but there was no response for several months, so he wrote a letter to ask for it.

The content is only one sentence: send a certain draft on a certain day, I don't know what will happen next.

There are more than 20 titles below, including "enjoy allowances", which take up most of the page.

The editor also has a level, first copied more than 20 titles with half a page, and then called Mr. so-and-so, and there is only one sentence in the text: "The level is not enough, so I can't use it." “

When I think of the editor's reply, there must have been a strong disgust and contempt in my heart, and he was referring to more than just the level of the manuscript.

I remember when I was a reporter at the grassroots level and ran a rural school.

Those rural intellectuals at the lowest level are living in difficulty and are in dire straits.

The county is very talented, so it specially allows some old teachers to enjoy the supply of two catties of pork on major festivals.

But I've never heard a teacher introduce himself: enjoy two catties of pork.

Marie Curie is the only female scientist to have won two Nobel Prizes, but she never talks about it, and she gives her little daughter a gold medal to kick and play on the ground.

Whether it is a big or small intellectual, whether it is a person who does things or learns, one of the most basic qualities is to be down-to-earth and not to deceive the world and steal his name.

We often say that intellectuals are the elite of the state and society.

Elites, the essence of thought, the English of morality, and then learn to specialize, can calm down to do things, do learning, for the backbone of society, the teacher of citizens.

The allowance is not forgotten, and it must also be misappropriated as a false name, which is not the work of the intellectual elite.

If the country wants to be strong, the people must be strong first, and the people must be strong first, and the elites must be strong first.

I'm worried that if someone goes abroad and prints a business card with the prefix "enjoyment", first, foreigners can't understand it, and second, if they really understand it, it will be even worse, and they will lose their dignity.

We often criticize the impetuousness of the world, complain that young people are immature, that the literary and artistic circles are too superficial, and that cadres are not knowledgeable, and so on.

As everyone knows, the floating of elites is really a crisis in society.

How intellectuals treat fame and fortune is worth pondering for a long time.

Or ask: How do you evaluate the current situation of education in China, and what kind of ideal education do you have in mind?

Answer: As far as I know, the status quo of education has not changed, and the old system is still being implemented. Now everyone thinks that the education of the Beiyang warlord period may be the best education in modern China, the second period is the period of the Southwest Associated University, and the third period is the education of the 50s, and the quality of professors and students far exceeds today. The next stage is after "Brother Wen", which was relatively good from the late 70s to the early 80s.

However, the two or three stages after 1949 could not add up to the same as in the Beiyang period, because the state could not intervene in education at that time, and Peking University and Tsinghua University at that time did not listen to the government at all. After the KMT took over, it tried to infiltrate university education, but it was unsuccessful. The professors we are talking about governing the school ran through the warlord melee period, the period of some national name parties, and even the period of the Anti-Japanese War, and the complete change began in 1950.

Or ask: What was education like in the fifties and sixties?

Answer: The idealism that prevailed in the fifties and sixties now seems to have a lot of illusory elements, but it is real, because it was a new regime, full of hope, and many contradictions had not yet emerged. At that time, elementary school teachers, middle school teachers, especially the best professors in universities, all came from the Republic of China. Most of these people's qualities and personalities were cultivated during the Republic of China, and then they stayed in the Republic to teach primary, middle, and university schools. They love education more selflessly and simply than today's teachers.

Needless to say, there were no utilitarian, opportunistic, and completely mechanical exams like today's society. So I would say it was a little bit better back then than it is now. Take Jiang Nanxiang as an example, he was the president of Tsinghua University, and now everyone misses him, because during his tenure, it was much more lenient than today's Tsinghua University. He was actually sent by the party, but after all, he was still a young man of the Republic of China, and his academic personality and administrative style were still much better than today's university presidents.

Or ask: What is the significant difference between the spiritual temperament of the Republic of China and today's people?

Answer: The Chinese people have all the problems of the Republic of China now, and they are a mess. I don't think that the people of the Republic of China have a higher moral standard than today's people, but in the field of education, why do we still miss the principals, professors, and students of the Republic of China today? Because they are very simple, politics has not ruined them, and they can have their own stand, and they can have their own stand, and they are not influenced by the government and political parties. Cai Yuanpei is a veteran of the Guoming Party, but he can refuse many measures of the Beiyang government, and the Beiyang government has no way to take him, and has to reuse him.

To put it exaggeratedly, the people in the entire education circle during the Republic of China, whether teachers, students, officials, were free and serious, and he would really do whatever he wanted to do. Which principal today dares to completely ignore what the government thinks and go straight to what he thinks is right? Which student dares to stand up and say to the president, "You are wrong, you should step down"? During the Republic of China, there were often cases of expelling presidents and professors, and although they were a bit radical and brought about some undesirable consequences, in any case, the students at that time were assertive, actionable, and influential. May Fourth is an example, and "29 January" is also an example.

Compared with the Chinese people after 1949, the biggest difference between the people of the Republic of China and the Chinese people after 1949 is that the context of traditional Chinese culture has not been broken. Although scientific research was abolished in 1905, the collective personality of the scholars accumulated over 2,000 years is still there, and the general vein of learning is still there, and it is still there until the early years of the founding of the People's Republic of China. The junior high school and college students I saw when I was a child, their tutors, their attitude towards learning, their eagerness, responsibility, and dedication, have not been completely broken. The real break is after the "Wen Pigeon". There was a little bit of a retrospective in the 80s, but it only lasted for 10 years, and in the 90s, it went down again, and it all became that I wanted to get a degree, or I wanted to join the party, I wanted to do business, and going to school became a naked utilitarian thing.

Sun Fuchu, an English teacher at Tsinghua University, once talked about the English education of his generation in the 40s, and he said that they were basically able to read on their own, write in English, and sing in English in high school. So when you enter the university, it is already assumed that you have passed the English test.

Today, a graduate student may not be able to open his mouth or read an entire English book, but today's English test is the most stringent in history, which is ridiculous! In addition, people have been criticizing the administrativeization of education, and the university has become an official government, and if you want to be a president, a dean, or a department head, the premise must be an official. So what else are you talking about education?

Or ask: What is the beauty of the language in the Republic of China era? What does the education of the Republic of China mean by being so kind?

Answer: The textbooks of the Republic of China are so kind, especially the primary school textbooks, there are cats, dogs, springs, kites, and the people who compile the texts have compassion and parental hearts. You see Zhou Haiying's memoirs mentioned in his report card when he was in elementary school in Shanghai, including morality, intelligence, courage, humility, politeness, etc., none of which is the so-called love. This is to treat you as a child, as a human being.

Mr. Mu Xin took literature classes in a primary school in Wuzhen as a child, and a primary school in the Chinese countryside already played the songs of Mozart and Schubert, as well as Browning's fairy tales and Hans Christian Andersen's fairy tales. He didn't even know who Mozart was, he was seven or eight years old at the time. If you go to watch "Early Spring February" and other teachers and children in Republic of China movies, they are all very kind and very simple. They believe in this society, they believe in people, and their mentality is good.

No one today can say that he really believes in this society. When he came out, his parents told him that you have to be careful, you can't interact with people so simply. This kind of education is completely extinct. Today's children know which aunt to have a good relationship with as soon as they enter kindergarten, and which aunt's parents are stuffed with money. His childhood memories and juvenile memories are a long list of interpersonal relationships and a long list of interests, and there is no room for kindness. However, if this interpersonal relationship is not explained clearly, how can your children mix up?

We are afraid of being fooled in everything, and we have to lie to others, we have to hide our true thoughts, which has become our physiological code, and this is how we have been taught along the way. Child, whatever you give him, he will accept. Whether a child reads the Book of Poetry or the Tao Te Ching from an early age, his personality and upbringing are definitely different; Just as a child reads the "Three Character Classic" or "Quotations" from an early age, it will definitely be different when he grows up.

Or ask: Are today's children pseudo-naïve and pseudo-kind?

Answer: Since kindergarten, children have been receiving pseudo-education for a long time, and they are all pretending to be happy, pretending to be surprised, and pretending to be excited, and pretending to be a lifetime. From the actors, you can see that you compare the movies of the Republic of China with the movies after the 80s, one is the formatting of the language, all of which are standard Mandarin, and the other is the patterning of expressions. Gala, mostly Chinese films. He may also be performing very sincerely, but the possibilities of thousands of combinations of human senses and emotions are all incorporated into several fixed patterns.

Many actors in the Republic of China are actually not as good as today's acting skills, but he is straightforward. You look at Ruan Lingyu, Zhou Xuan, Zhao Dan, these movie stars in the Republic of China, they are influenced by Western dramas and are also imitating, but they are 100% sincere and enthusiastic when they imitate, and they have not yet formed a model. That's why things like "Cross Street" and "Angel on the Road" are still classics today, and the most rare thing is that truth. This truth was preserved until the fifties.

Why did "Tales from a Small Town" taste completely wrong when it was remade later? Because all the crew and directors unconsciously were in a mode, although they showed 100% sincerity, they could no longer act that truth. After 1949, everyone grew up in the unit, in a culture of holding meetings, expressing attitudes, and shouting slogans, and then suddenly liberated, saying that you are free, you can express yourself how you want, but he has been modeled, his personality, his physiological reactions are modeled. The current host is still spreading a kind of pseudo-sincerity and pseudo-touching, and a few people who have jumped out of this mode a little bit have immediately become the most popular.

Or ask: Several of Lu Xun's famous articles have been eliminated from primary and secondary school textbooks, why?

Answer: Because Lu Xun is black, he is dark and pessimistic, which the government never wants children to have. They have been trying to send a message that this country is very good and that you are the happiest right now. When Lu Xun was in the Republic of China, he did not agree to include his articles in textbooks. He said in an article, I don't want young people to read my books, my heart is very dark, I don't want to infect this emotion to young people, young people are growing up, the world has just unfolded, don't create a dark heart like mine for them.

In fact, there are several black, dark, and poisonous writers in every country, such as Nietzsche, Mr. Mu Xin talks a lot in his books, including Jesus. These "toxic" literature are only helpful to some children with particularly sensitive and tenacious personalities, but for the vast majority of young people, it is not necessarily necessary to read them, and it is useless to read them.

Or ask: Some parents are willing to homeschool their children now, but some people are worried that their children who grow up in this way will not be able to integrate into mainstream society in the future, what do you think?

Answer: This is a natural thing today, because people do not trust society, and they do not trust education and medical care. You can't do medical care yourself, but you can teach your own education. I am not worried that children will not be able to survive in society in the future when they are homeschooled, on the contrary, people are far more adaptable than they think, and people will grow in all kinds of environments.

The reason for his current education is that he assumes that one must go to elementary school, middle school, and university in order to become a useful person to society. I don't really believe that a person has to go through school to become a social person.

Or ask: Qian Xuesen asked three questions before he died, one of which was why the current Chinese education could not cultivate first-class talents?

Answer: The answer is actually very simple, Huaxia education is not to cultivate first-class talents, and it has been very successful. In the past fifty or sixty years, education has only done one thing, and that is to control the youth, so that you are passive, not active.

Or ask: Many people think that the education system in China is not as bad as everyone criticizes, for example, they think that the consistent education they have received since childhood, they think it is good to live in this way.

Answer: That's why I said that this education control is very successful. In the above generation, you still feel pain when he beats you, and no matter how you control him in this generation, he doesn't know that it hurts, because his life is all like this, and he doesn't know that there are other ways to grow up, and he will wonder why you say that this education is not good.

Or ask: After taking their children abroad, a parent of a student said that China's basic education is the most solid in the world, and some Chinese even sent their children back to primary and secondary schools in China to receive basic education. What do you think of this approach?

Answer: This must be true. An education system like that of Huaxia will certainly produce one of the most solid groups in the world in terms of so-called basic education. But what is basic education? What should basic education include? If it refers to examination ability, Chinese students are absolutely the first in the world. This is a large-scale, long-term infiltration of compulsory education, which is almost equivalent to military training, and it will definitely work.

There are many international students in the United States, and when all Chinese students enter the school, they immediately become the best students in the school, and American students are not opponents at all, but when they graduate and enter the field they are engaged in, the best immediately become Americans or people from other countries. The gap lies in the cultivation of personality, the lack of individuality, freedom, imagination, courage and curiosity.

There are many people who are bound by thoughts, but if you are a person with some thoughts, you will make the bound limbs less painful. When people fight, some old gentlemen will exchange experiences after the fight: "I knelt for four hours because I found that there is a way of kneeling that is not so tiring." "I'm not telling a joke, every young person in today's situation must find their own way to find even a little space, so that they can grow up relatively normally. It must be tied, as long as the general environment remains the same.

A hundred flowers bloom and a hundred schools of thought contend, which is always spring. (To be continued.) )