A few days ago, a book friend added a group for this book, but when he mentioned this book, he directly pointed out a problem: the white book has not been torn up until now, and the protagonist himself is there to talk about philosophy. Pen ~ fun ~ pavilion www.biquge.info

I was stunned for a moment, and then replied that this book was not meant to tear up, and then pulled a bunch of things like tearing is not the point.

Thinking about it later,It's really ridiculous to say these things yourself.,Sick Jiao's book is now torn high.,You're an author who writes tearing and writing very happily and now says that you don't want to write tearing about spring things and wa2 of the same people.,What are you pretending to be cold?

But, in fact, when I was writing this book, when I went back and read the outline for this book, I found that I had buried all the foreshadowing of the main line and set up all the foreshadowing of the emotional line, but in the process, I really didn't want to write about tearing. From the very beginning, when I wrote this book, I wanted to talk about this so-called philosophy.

Of course, I'm not saying that I wanted to write philosophy and then write this book, but in fact anyone who has even a little impression of these concepts of political philosophy will find that the philosophy in my book is full of holes and the logic is particularly bad. My original purpose in writing this book was actually to write a somewhat different book of spring things fanjin.

When Wataru was writing about spring things, I think his focus should not be on the last Yukino Party and the Tuanzi Party, he wanted to write about the transformation of several students in different situations who are in the so-called adolescent mentality is very awkward, but under the rendering of animation, including the transfer of some novels, many people ignore these things instead, and understand the big teacher as the tearing war of WA4. This is actually putting the cart before the horse.

So, although I set up a very strange protagonist, I set up a very far-fetched logic of the protagonist's behavior, and this protagonist can't resonate with anyone compared to the big teacher, and it can only make people think that this guy is boring. Very middle two.

However, I still wanted to write about a transition, a transition for a middle school student, and that's what I want to focus on. I can't write a protagonist that resonates with people, and even the protagonist has some web novel templates on him, but I still want to write something similar to the changes of those people in Chunwu.

Of course, I also have what I want to convey, the various ways of the main character, if you can clearly see that he did it wrong, then the logic behind what he did at the time is what I am against, if you think he did it right, then maybe the values behind it are what I want to convey, that's all.

Everyone will think that I often write a large paragraph of the protagonist's psychological monologue can't understand, dizzy, and then skip, I often recommend that you skip, but in fact, that's what I spend the most time when I write a chapter, if it's just a plot, write dialogue, my 4000 words per chapter is really easy to fill, but often only about 1000 words involving the monologue, is the part I spend the most energy, of course, I know that in the end, few people will pay attention to these words or want to string these words together, but this is also a little obsession of my personal life。

To be honest,It's hard to write about the same people of spring things.,It's not difficult to imitate the style of the voyage (except for Chiba's stalk),It's not difficult to write about the emotional disputes between the protagonists.,But,The difficulty is that I want to show that change in mentality.,I also want to build a logical system and framework of behavior for this set of mentality.,But also to find loopholes in this set of logical systems and frameworks and then overturn it.,And then that's a problem I've been struggling with.。 That's why when I first started the book, I couldn't write quickly, even if I had plenty of time to write during the summer vacation.

So I still think that the chapters of the summer vacation are really well written, often two days to ponder the wording and writing of a chapter, but now I find that either I use a lot of daily dialogue to water the content of a chapter and have no effect on the plot, or I use a monologue to advance a plot and then move on to the next chapter, which not only makes everyone look in the clouds, but also makes people feel that you are pretending to be self-absorbed.

Of course, there is also a first-person problem involved here.,When I was writing sick Jiao before,I used to complain that the third-person writing method can't let the protagonist's mental activity naturally inserted.,But now writing white.,I'll suddenly find that I wrote too much psychological activity and dialogue description, which slowed down the rhythm of the plot advancement.,This kind of problem hasn't been reflected when writing the original plot.,Just like when I wrote this plot of Shahi recently, every time I finished writing a chapter, I felt that there was no change, and I felt all kinds of guilt in my heart.,I feel like I'm too watery. 。

But it doesn't seem to be able to do anything.

In fact, having said so much, I just want to talk about a wayward idea of the wayward author who wrote this book, to write the plot as a real tearing direction, I think it will be easy, I also like to write this kind of thing, but I still want to be innovative, to change, hawkers, everyone understands that I am pretending to be forced, and I feel that if I don't tear up the plot, I have a sense of superiority or something.

Of course,In fact, in the end, I'm very grateful to the book friends who have been voting for me.,Although I haven't done this kind of thing for a long time.,But the current position on the recommendation list is really a bit unexpected to me.,I believe that many of the book friends who voted for me didn't come to see me talk about philosophy.,But I can endure the author's little willfulness.,Thank you very much.。

One of the things I often warn myself about is that I must not let the author's own self-interest override the story of the novel itself, and although I have always struggled to find a balance between this kind of self-interest and the plot of this book, and I have been pouring it out lately, I will still try my best, try to adjust, try to make the book seem less inconsistent. Next is supposed to be the final climax of the second volume, but it won't be as enjoyable as the first volume, and it may seem a little depressing, but I still hope to be able to write what I want to write for everyone to see, well, that's it.

;