Well, the main purpose of this chapter is to find people, but after reading some things, although I don't know the specific situation, I still want to say some of my own thoughts. Pen, fun, and www.biquge.info

First of all, let's talk about an interesting story when chatting with my roommate, he once asked me a question, why so many dead house nationalism on station B and station A is so serious, he thinks this is logically inexplicable. Then I looked at him with a look of brain damage: Don't you know that the vast majority of people in the world are schizophrenic and logically inconsistent? Well, it's just a joke, and I hope that no one in the book review area will chase after me about this issue.

Another thing, the people who have added to my book group know what my major is, and they also know what the only absolutely forbidden thing I am in the group is, the answer is all politics, a person who studies politics does not like people to talk about political issues, why, because I see that the vast majority of people, when talking about political issues, use a terrible naked realist logic, I don't like the realism of meritocracy, and idealism has never had a market in our society, and then, as a liberal, I did an unfree thing in my book group, of course, this matter is quite ironic, I also admit it。

What do I mean by saying these two things?

First of all, I would like to say that all of us in our land, all of us, who are born realists, non-realists, people with ideas, are incompatible with the vast majority of people in this land - of course, this ideal does not refer to the general ideal, but to a so-called "universal" thing. Because we have no religious beliefs, we don't need spiritual sustenance, what we pursue is the present world, so all the ideas we pursue are for the sake of realistic achievements, put on individuals, are achievements and fame, and of course they will be more obvious when they are put on the country, which is prosperity and strength. The West has tried to find an ideal political model since ancient Greece, but the Chinese never need it, we learn from Mr. De, we learn from the horse master, we always follow the realist consideration, do not need a model, only consider success, in the same way, we despise the country on the other side of the Himalayas, we look down on the island on the other side of the strait, all based on the concept of results. Quite simply, when it turns out that the elite can make the country strong, and when it turns out that Mr. De does not necessarily bring prosperity to the country, why should we Mr. De? I can say unequivocally that I don't like that. But I don't judge whether it's right or wrong, and I don't try to convince the majority, so I hope that if someone thinks the same way as me, they can understand this kind of identity that is rooted in culture, and not that they are bookish and debating, and that even after the debate, they want to be able to maintain a normal heart.

Secondly, I want to say some of my personal thoughts, what our culture of realism has brought to us, successful experiences, successful results, I think everyone is very clear, I want to say, beyond that, can we have a little more respect. If we take it for granted that because the international community has no government, we can rely on our own strength to bully the weak, then can I also understand that if our country is not governed, each of us can rely on our own strength to bully the weak? But gradually, our civilization is developing, we begin to respect the weak, we begin to protect the weak, we begin to protect the rights and interests of the weak, because, I think, this is the so-called true noble character that human beings have slowly realized in the process of gradual evolution. And that, I think, should also apply when our countries are strong, and when each of us looks at other weak international actors. I know that this idea of mine is called "Madonna" by many people, and everyone thinks it is ridiculous, but I still hope that in addition to realism, we can also add a little aura called "ideal" to ourselves, because, as human beings, we should still have something more noble than survival.

Finally, after this idealistic text, what I want to say is that a certain high-spirited Taiwanese is big, almost dissipated and reloaded QQ, if you want to listen to some other lectures, I still want you to send me a manuscript!

;