Comrade Chen Guanyu, who is a veteran in the critics' circles, has published several articles in succession, saying that science fiction works are only a branch of popular science works, and that Govin's motives for writing science fiction novels are not pure. His remarks finally angered Gowen, so Gowen began to criticize Chen Guanyu in the newspaper in the style of writing that Chen Guanyu is best at.

In order to maintain the dignity of himself and the critics, Chen Guanyu is willing to show weakness, so he naturally wants to educate this backward in the literary world,......,...

And so this war of words began

This was indeed a very good news topic, and when the excited tabloids began to publish the news of Govin and Chen Guanyu in their newspapers, and reprinted the articles they were arguing about in their own newspapers, the sales of their newspapers really increased.

Naturally, this made a lot of tabloids very happy, so the continuous follow-up report began to strike while the iron was hot.

The day after Govyn published "Some People, Words Are Not Rough: Some People, Words Are Not Rough", Chen Guanyu immediately fought back.

In an interview with China Youth Daily, he loudly complained to reporters:

The work of literary criticism is not easy to do, sometimes you have good intentions to communicate literature or scholarship with authors, you want to make the literary world more prosperous, you want the authors to be more improved, you want readers to see better works,............ However, there are always some authors who are messing around, swearing and swearing, and I believe that if these authors could meet the commentators themselves, I am afraid that they would have been fists and kicks a long time ago.

When the reporter mentioned his war of words with Gowen, Chen Guanyu angrily rebuked: "The biggest problem now is not in the attainment of literature, but in the moral standard of life!" "Govyn's work is good, but his character is so bad! …。 "The fact that he used this language itself shows the inadequacy of his learning and cultivation...", "The fact that he cannot be used as a proof of "pure literature" is .........,...

And when Chen Guanyu's interview was published in "China Youth Daily", "Govin sneered, and wrote an article to express his disdain for Chen Guanyu."

In the past few days, one of these enthusiastic readers, in addition to applauding Gowen's behavior, has written a letter to support and encourage Gowen.

And among these readers, there happen to be several authors who have been unfairly criticized and deliberately satirized by Chen Guanyu, who have always been very annoyed by Chen Guanyu's behavior, but they can't vent this anger: "After all, everyone still has to mix in this circle."

Now that someone has finally stood up for them, the authors recounted the story of Chen Guanyu in a letter sent to Govyn, and provided a lot of evidence that Chen Guanyu was a commentator in vain.

And it was this evidence that made Govin even more convinced of his actions.

Such hypocrites should expose their hypocrisy, not only for the sake of science fiction, but also for the sake of new writers in the literary world, but also for the good works that have been buried by unfair comments, and more importantly, for the sake of readers who have given their trust to these moral hypocrites

See how they deceive the reader in the future

Govin writes in the article

It seems that our critic Comrade Chen Guanyu is a little out of reasoning and words, and he does not do the work of literary and artistic criticism, but he goes to do some kind of interviews.

Since we talk about morality, let's talk about morality. I would like to ask Comrade Chen Guanyu a few questions:

1. During the Cultural Revolution, you once planned a book called "Revolutionary Youngster" written by a girl named Li Chen, which was very unliterary, but was praised by you, what happened?

2. You served as the final judge in a literary review that year, and then the final winner of that literary review was the author of a published book he curated.

3. You once publicly expressed your opinion on an author named Cai Fei in the newspaper, and he wrote, "I know this person" has written one or two books and won one or two awards, but it was later confirmed that this author named Cai Fei did not find this person at all. What's going on here?

I have never doubted the positive significance of literary criticism. Literary criticism is an important part of literary activity. Since the existence of literary works and their dissemination, consumption and reception, literary criticism has been born and developed, and constitutes an indispensable and important content of literary theory and a dynamic, guiding and constructive factor in the rectification of literary activities, which not only promotes the development of literary thought and literary theory, but also promotes the dissemination and reception of literature.

It's just that some people have clearly abused their rights and abused the credulity of their readers.

The reason why I'm so mean" is only because I want some people to stand in a calm and fair state of mind and be a little stricter when they accuse others, so please stop those funny reasons.

You can't say he's not literature just because he's science fiction and not pure literature

You can't look at an author with a colored eye just because he is creating a work of science fiction! Every work is the author's brainchild and the author's child, what would you do if your own child was slandered?

As early as after Govyn published his first article in Wen Wei Po for Chen Guanyu, it surprised all readers, such an article, such a Govine made them very unfamiliar, and it also subverted everyone's stereotype of Govin all along

This talented literary boy may be a little unruly, or a little impulsive, but his heart is good, kind, his articles can often move readers, his enthusiasm for literature, for the truth, for the motherland is incomparable, the "Generation", the "Taoist Tower", the series of articles on the rise of a great country all prove this

So although every reader feels very novel about this "Comment is a fart, pretending to be careful of being struck by lightning these days", it is like drinking a can of cold beer on a hot summer day, but the vulgarity in that article still makes some readers who originally liked and loved Govin a little disgusted and disgusted.

Although readers who support him or oppose him are incomparably surprised by the sharpness and meanness of this article, they will smash their mouths with great emotion and mumble to themselves

Spicy, extremely spicy

This is the real laughter and scolding

This is the export chapter (dirty)! Every reader admires that Govin can write the vulgar colloquialisms of daily life into the article, and use the vulgar words to gather into a reasonable and well-founded article.

But after all, this is a stain on Gowen, although Gowen himself has never cared about other people's opinions, although he has long since his debut has a mixed reputation among readers (of course, the reputation is more than ruined).

But in this era when it is still conservative, in this era when people are still working and living according to the inertia of the Japanese era, this move to break the image is undoubtedly very dangerous, you must know that if Govin wants to realize his ideals and influence more people, he must make people believe in him and trust him

And these articles are shooting themselves in the foot.

Then this article came out of Gowen, and then all of a sudden the situation turned again.

Compared with the vulgarity of the first two reviews, Govyn's essay is very serious and sincere in discussing things throughout, and the three questions he asks Chen Guanyu make readers understand at once who is righteous and who is bright: and the final self-analysis and expectation make readers truly understand why Govyn was so angry and mean before.

The readers who applauded, the readers who were disgusted and disgusted with Gowyn, all generously and tolerantly forgave this rebellious youth.

Young people, who doesn't have some youthful years?

So things went back to the point before Govin published "Comments are a fart, pretend to be careful of being struck by lightning these years", and readers were still moved and even shed tears for "The Sadder", and they still loved or admired Govine, a young man who repeatedly aroused their emotions.

Perhaps the only difference is

Gowen's personality and the image of Gowen have become immediately resting in everyone's minds, he is no longer the name at the beginning of the title of the article or at the end of the article, it is no longer the person who is far away and on the edge of the sky, but like a nephew, a brother, and a big brother around the reader.

All kinds of emotional changes in the hearts of readers, all kinds of repetitions, and inadequacies with outsiders.

But as the author and reader of this book, I and you can only smile bitterly and say, Govern, your incendiary feelings are really awesome! Don't keep sensationalizing in the article, okay?

This is Govyn, a traverser who has never given up learning and has been silently working hard towards his ideals

In the face of Gowen's three questions, Chen Guanyu, who had been active in Wen Wei Po, suddenly stopped fighting, and did not respond to Gowen's article Liu Deng, and also refused to come to the media reporters for interviews.

This just confirms that readers are guessing about themselves, and then spitting out a sentence of slander

Ya is such a soft egg! What a sane hypocrite! Well, it seems that this is the end of the matter

Govyn wins.

But is that really the case?

Comrade Chen Guanyu, another protagonist of the war of words, made a cameo appearance for the writer of the www.biquge.info of Biquge, the world's first white children's shoes.

Here I recommend Chen Guanyu's "Rebirth of Internet Entertainment", a very good urban Xiaobaiwen.

In addition, in the new week, I hope that the children's shoes with a monthly pass in my hand can vote for a monthly ticket to encourage today's update, and finally two changes a day to be continued.