Ordinary readers pay attention to the touching brought to them by "The Sadder", and the novelty and surprise brought to them by the article "The comment is a fart, pretending to be careful to be struck by lightning these days", and they are concerned about the emotional enjoyment that these two articles bring to their souls. As for the shadow and hustle and bustle behind the article, does it have anything to do with them?

It doesn't matter a dime

Perhaps they will also pay attention to the background of Gowen's writing of "The Broken Heart", and will pay attention to the purpose of Gowen's written commentary, but this is only as a talking point, a gossip, and it is only an opportunity to show them profound knowledge and hearty eloquence.

The other group break is different.

China's literary scene is huge, but sometimes it's also small.

To say that China's literary world includes a lot of group breaks, and to say that it is small means that any sudden news and any gossip that pops up in this circle will spread ten or ten hundred and become a secret known to the entire circle.

Although the target of Gowen's article "Comments are a fart, pretending to be careful of being struck by lightning these days" is only aimed at Chen Guanyu in the critics' circles, the ridicule between the lines still makes most of the so-called experts in the critics feel extremely uncomfortable.

It's a naked slap in the face

And so the whole critic community was in an uproar.

As the party concerned, Chen Guanyu was even more red-faced and angry.

As a well-known critic, Chen Guanyu's status in the literary world is very prominent among the authors because of his Xu Xuan.

Do you want to offend a critic with the intention of the author? Although everyone is a cultural person, no one wants to leave a bad impression on readers because of their bad relationship with a person.

Because critics have the right to speak in the media and have a very large public influence, they are a group of writers who are careful about it.

Of course, there is no doubt about the role of a true critic or critic, they can provide constructive advice to the writer, and can help the writer to explore the direction of the development of artistic personality and style,.........

But how many critics can really stand on an objective and impartial standpoint?

Critics are respected and valued by the average reader, after all, they are experts and "specialize in this business", and their opinions and opinions are often more accurate and representative.

Therefore, the critic who can influence the reader's perception is often the guest in front of the author.

It's a pity that Govin doesn't recognize this. You're riding on Lao Tzu's head, and you still let Lao Tzu pretend to be a grandson?

That's impossible

Similarly, with regard to Govine's provocation, yes, Chen Guanyu believes that Govern's brazen refutation when he is exercising his rights and obligations is obviously an attack, a provocation, and a suspicion and denial of the role of their critics, and such a heinous behavior is something he cannot allow

So just four days after Govin published his crude naming article, Chen Guanyu responded.

In the latest issue of Literature and Art Daily, Liu published "My Statement in Response to Gowen", in which Chen Guanyu expressed his shock

Govin can disagree with me and dislike my writing, but he can't use such crude and vulgar words as "fart", "forced", "pretending to be a girl", and so on: this is not literary criticism, and this language has been suspected of personal insults and personal attacks.

The real reason for Gowen's dislike of my essay is that I don't think highly enough of his science fiction novels, and my dissatisfaction with the idea that science fiction is not a literary work but a popular science work.

Since his debut, Govyn has been very good in a series of works, and it can be said that he is a rising star in the literary world. He got too much praise and too much compliment" made him start to be proud, and he didn't have the grace to listen to different opinions, so he would jump like thunder when he heard criticism, and curse people with swear language, such as "fart", "force", "thatched pit", "", "prostitution". "Pretending to be a girl...", not only can't talk about "elegant quarrels.... And it gives a great irony to the "rare pure literature" writer. This is also "pure literature..."? Is this still "rare..."?

Govin can express his disagreement, he can express his disagreement with my comments, but no one has the privilege of scolding people by this, "nor does he have the immunity to scold people irresponsible, so he must accept the self-examination and public trial of the moral law." As a senior who has been in the literary world for more than ten years, I hope that he can change himself and set a good example for readers.

Although Chen Guanyu commented again this time, it was different from the previous times when he maliciously sold cuteness and maliciously sold his flashy hippie smiley face, on the contrary, his article was extremely simple: "Maybe Chen Guanyu thinks that his article is not suitable for laughing and scolding in front of readers, or he is ashamed to see Gowen's naming article and is embarrassed to show it again.........,...

Anyway, "Chen Guanyu's "My Statement... Although "Responding to Gowen" has no literary value at all, it can only be regarded as a saliva question, but the conciseness of the text and the clear point of view do not appear in the same fault as the article in Gowen's article that ridicules him.

Naturally, as soon as Chen Guanyu's reply article appeared in the newspaper, writers and news media in the literary world suddenly felt an irrepressible sense of excitement

Is this going to be a polemic?

In fact, most readers only feel a little novel about Govyn's comment, they feel very happy when they read it, they don't know why Govine suddenly wrote such a comment, they don't know what happened, and Chen Guanyu's sudden dedication makes most people really interested.

Then they learned about the incident from the reports of some news media who paid attention to the matter, and it turned out that the two were fighting each other

You know that most Chinese like to be lively, walking on the street, if a person suddenly bored to raise his head to stare at the sky, pretending to be careful, it will definitely attract a group of passers-by to stop and also look for the sky, and then there will be more people, until the traffic jams. If you ask them what they're looking at, they won't be able to tell one, two, three, four.

So in the face of such a seemingly interesting event, readers are equally excited.

That's the power of gossip

And the day after Chen Guanyu counterattacked Gewen's ridicule, Gewen's article appeared again on the deputy Liu of Wen Wei Po.

"Some people, the words are not rough: some people, the words are not rough"

Yesterday I saw Comrade Chen Guanyu's response.

It's very interesting to watch. Perhaps literary critics have the ability to start a sanctimonious critique without carefully reading people's articles.

Then let me state it.

I didn't scold you in the whole article.

"Fart" is to scold the comments, don't be sentimental, think that you are the critics.

"Force" is genitals, but "pretending to be forced" does not mean pretending to be genitals, don't take it out of context. I'm talking about pretending to be a force, not your mother's force.

"**" It's me, it's okay with you.

"" is not bullishness, don't believe you don't know.

As for the "thatched pit", I think the thatched pit is very innocent. Could it be that the so-called people who have entered the literary world are not in the pit? Also, the excrement is all written, so naturally there is no need for it.

Take a closer look at the article, is there a word that scolds you? If you insist that Comrade Chen Guanyu is equivalent to being stupid and that I am scolding, then I can't help it.

The meaning of the article is actually that there is no literary world, everyone who writes articles is a writer, every writer writes articles, and writing science fiction novels is no exception. Especially a lot of science fiction novels, they are all good writing, good fantasy, this is literature, the most typical example is the "Sadder" that you have been criticizing recently, I don't know if you have read the comments written by Liu Deng yesterday in the "China Youth Daily" by Mr. He Jingzhi? Even the old comrades of the Central Propaganda Department appreciate "The Sadder" so much, which shows that this science fiction novel is indeed very good

So please don't teach people how to write, it's not that you say it's literature, it's literature, you say it's not literature, it's writing.

Literature does not need anyone's affirmation and guidance. In these days, anything can be literature except popular science works.

Of course, looking at the Chinese literary criticism circles, the characteristics and strengths of some people are: 1: I don't know what others are saying. 2: I don't know what to do. 3: I don't know what to do. This has been elevated to the level of moral law. Since you have also paid attention to the kid and know that the kid is a rising star, then you must know that I have often been scolded by critics and even some readers since my debut, why didn't you jump out to pursue their morality at that time?

Govin has always been the focus of media attention, this kid has never been a peaceful person, and every time he will make huge waves and cause a huge sensation. And things related to Govin are also things that readers like, otherwise the once small newspaper "New Zhou Evening News" would not have become a large-scale newspaper in East China because of the photo of Liu Deng's arrest.

In fact, as long as you are engaged in the news, you can know about the controversy between science fiction and criticism and science popularization in the science popularization circles these days, but such things can be reported, but the scope involved is too wide and the personnel are too mixed, and it is too good to fan the flames.

The debate between Qian Xuesen and Govyn a few days ago was actually a very good news event, but because Govern's banner died down, but because the media taboo reported on the trivial matters of the leaders, it was naturally impossible to hype up that discussion, and now there is finally an opportunity

Govin is more than Chen Guanyu, a science fiction writer than a critic elite.........,...

Tsk, such a topic will definitely be very hot, and it will definitely make the sales of our newspaper go to a higher level! (To be continued.)