Those who favour or advocate a full or substantial restoration of those elements of Confucianism in the governance of the state and in the conduct of individuals are either deaf and ignorant and incapable of seeing the development trend of society because of their short-sightedness, or they are not beautiful and unkind, and deliberately fail to satisfy the fundamental interests of the broadest masses of the people because of their personal interests or preferences. Either way, they are all on the opposite side of the broad masses of the people. The broad masses of the people have neither interest nor need to care whether those who hold this position belong to the former or the latter of the sub-categories, but simply oppose them in general. We must understand that we do not criticize Confucius and Mencius. On the contrary, we affirm and appreciate the important role they have played in history and the great contributions they have made to the development of Chinese culture. In addition, we must admit that the theories put forward by Confucius and Mencius, as well as by a group of Confucian sages, were advanced at the time, and some of them are still available today. This evaluation is based on history and is fair to historical figures. However, there are many people who do not realize the superiority of the socialist system and fail to understand that the social order and social structure of a socialist society can enable the people to better exercise their birthright to equality, thus making the society more stable and harmonious. Therefore, they believe that all the problems that arise in society are due to our behavior that is not in line with tradition, or that any behavior that does not conform to tradition is itself a problem worthy of correction. Only by completely imitating the ancient law can we restore public order and good customs in society and make society clean and upright. Under the bewitchment of these people, the "female Durban", "disciple rule class" and all kinds of so-called inheritance of classic academies were able to become popular, and gathered a group of people who were conservative in their thinking and afraid of change. The slogan of "promoting traditional culture" has provided them with the confidence to pull up the banner as a tiger's skin, and they have the support of the direction of the major policies whose prestige is similar to that of the supreme directive, and they will not have any doubts about the stand they adhere to. That is, they do not look at problems from a realistic perspective, do not understand the situation, do not try any new plans and new ideas, and hope to solve new problems with old methods. However, anyone with a little common sense will understand that the old methods are not used to solve new problems, and the new problems are not created according to the key points drawn in the old way. We want to criticize these conservative and unchangeable people. It is better for us to look at the problem from both a historical perspective and a realistic perspective. In this way, historical figures can not only be reasonably evaluated, but also be able to adopt reasonable ways and means to govern the country and standardize behavior. However, if we fail to do so, we can also retreat to the next best thing: that is, we can abandon the use of historical eyes to look at problems and only look at problems from the perspective of reality. In this way, although we have offended the ancients, the normal functioning of society has not been affected. But we must guard against some people who are afraid of offending the ancients, and do not hesitate to sacrifice the interests of today's people for this reason. Of course, it is not a big deal to let Kong Meng carry two black cauldrons that do not belong to them, and everyone also understands in their hearts that the ancestors will not jump out of the grave and chase after the descendants. However, if we are the first to deviate from the scriptures and go against the rules and regulations of Confucianism, are we afraid that we will be criticized by the audience? Or if we have passed a few more foreign festivals and a few fewer traditional festivals, and we are not afraid that we will be poked in the backbone by others? If we dare to ask the master to take the blame but do not dare to argue with the conservative forces, this is not because we are afraid of offending the ancients, but because we are afraid of offending those who are afraid of offending the ancients. Or follow this logic layer by layer, and in the end the fear is only a few scattered small groups. But this is the case, so that in the end, everyone "looks at the problem from the perspective of history" and gives up "looking at the problem from the perspective of reality". I know what is most beneficial, but I am confined to some reasons that seem mysterious but cannot stand up to the roots. This is not only "slapping a swollen face to make a fat man", but also "dying to save face and suffer a crime". According to this, the core of the correct treatment of traditional Chinese culture is to treat Confucianism correctly, and the core task of the correct treatment of Confucianism is to correctly treat the defenders of Confucianism. The correct attitude towards Confucian defenders is, to put it succinctly, opposed. If the person concerned has enough time and energy, he will use a coherent logic to argue, question, and criticize. If the person is pressed for time and is depressed, he or she will be turned away. All in all, the person who gets in the way will either move out of the way or be invited out of the house. Only when these people who are required to stand by themselves and others kneel, or who have become accustomed to kneeling by themselves and do not want others to stand can no longer shake the belief of the majority of people in new things and new ideas, can we carefully consider bit by bit without interference what should be retained, what can be retained or not, and which should be resolutely abandoned.

Of course, there are some benefits to tradition.

For example, when you eat dumplings, no one complains.

And at this time.

"So, do you know when you were born? ”

"Yes......"

Wang Jian frowned, but he didn't say anything, in fact, he had already turned over the river and the sea.

2084......

You are really young, three fat people, you call us brother, you are simply taking advantage of the extreme.

But so did Wang Jian's surprise.

Is the three fat man being deceived or lying?

Could it be that we have crossed over to this point, but decades have passed, and everything has passed......

If it was decades later, then Long Yifei and Lu Qingyi would have been gone for a long time, even if they found their way home

More than that, it's how bleak it should be.

For a moment, Wang Jian felt that he should not give up.

It's like Captain America, who has been in the ice cave for decades, and after coming out, the original beauty is no longer there.

But he still pulled himself together.

Even if a hundred years have passed, you should not give up. 90 look

Immediately, Wang Jian felt that something was wrong.

But I still don't know what is wrong.

Just looked at the fried chicken suspiciously.

Wang Jian thought about it for a while and decided to try the birthday of the three fat men first.

Then, his intention was to move forward from this day, and in combination with the observed wear and tear positions, he found an opportunity to open the door.

However, it started at the first time.

The password is the birthday of the three fat men.

This made him flurry on the spot.

Is the third fat man the son of an important person here?

However, what really shocked Wang Jian was that the equipment in the room was still usable.

Books will all decay in about 1~200 years. The age of storage devices such as CDs and disks is about 100 years. The film is about 150 years old wooden buildings: disappear in 100 years reinforced glass buildings: collapse in 200 years brick, stone and concrete buildings: last up to 1000 years 5000 years later, all the surface remains of human civilization are almost impossible to find. In 50,000 years, all human remains on Earth (including glass and plastic) will be difficult to find. In 200,000 years, the few man-made chemical pollutants will be completely dissolved. Two million years later, the last radioactive material from nuclear waste will also complete its final decay. This is the limit of time that human civilization can keep at present.

If we don't be strong, we will be defeated. If we don't strive for salvation, we'll fall to the bottom of hell. We are not sold by the great powers, and we are the bargain for the appeasement of the outcasts. We can't make everything, and we're looted by dumping. If we are not self-sufficient and have enough food and clothing, we will starve and eat in the wilderness, and we will be a hell of cannibalism. Even if they beg for food, they will not be satisfied. If we can't stand tall as a strong man, we'll be expelled from the club. We can't become creditors by hard work, we will be at the bottom of the food chain, and our children and grandchildren will not be able to pay their debts. We can't show off our military strength, and the land will become a Shura field for powerful countries to fight. All this is proof of a century of humiliation. Therefore, we must rely on the strength of struggle in exchange for self-confidence and respect.

As for the definition of civilization, let's just think that civilization is the sum of the material civilization and spiritual civilization of human society, that is, the sum of human groups and their derivatives. There are already many answers to the question of survival needs, biology, etc., so I won't go into details. Personally, I understand the individual human being as the unit of action of consciousness, and civilization (or human groups) as the larger unit of action of consciousness. Why do human beings want to continue their civilization, and can it be understood that human beings want to continue human groups? In this way, the answer to the question is: the desire for the development of consciousness prompts civilization (higher consciousness) to guide human beings (medium consciousness) to continue civilization.

It can be a bit of a twist, especially when it comes to awareness. I think that consciousness is a factor (or rule) that exists universally in space, and that if you want to be a matter of complexity, you can operate consciousness of a considerable degree of complexity. Just like cells, humans, and civilizations, this consciousness has levels and layers of influence. The similarity lies in the fact that there is a tendency for consciousness to act on that level, that is, existence and development (for a single level of consciousness, existence is generally greater than development, just as individuals do not think about building society until their own survival needs are satisfied). And for civilization, the same is true, after the civilization consciousness is formed, it will try its best to maintain its own existence and development, because the civilization level is higher than the individual, so human beings often sacrifice even some individuals, so civilization must continue.

In some ways, humanity is not deliberately trying to keep its civilization alive. It is just the birth of generation after generation, the state of the sum of each person's behavior under the trend of "desire". ("desire" here stands for all behavioral drivers) finally get used to it, and when people see this phenomenon, they will subjectively assume that human beings want to continue their civilization, after all, we are afraid of losing, losing our skills, losing our culture, losing our civilization. As long as the essence of human beings remains unchanged, they will always be afraid of loss and death, which is objectively existing in nature, and even if everyone believes that they do not exist for the sake of the continuation of human civilization, civilization will still continue.

This is a very important feature of Chinese civilization. Today's Chinese use the script that was already used during the Shang Dynasty, and from the font, it has evolved from oracle bone script to kaishu. If we now read Chinese poetry from 3,000 years ago (some of the early Zhou works in the Book of Songs), we will find that they still rhyme. The way Chinese worship their ancestors today is much the same as during the Shang and Zhou dynasties. In fact, if a person from the Han Dynasty wakes up today, he will find that the psychology and habits of this nation are not far from those of the Han Dynasty. In other words, for thousands of years, Chinese civilization has generally developed independently and has always had its own distinctive personality.

Because they believe in God, and we believe in our ancestors. Of all civilizations, only the Chinese civilization is indifferent to the existence of God. The idea we follow is one that puts loyalty and filial piety first. We don't believe in strange gods, we only believe in our own kings, martyrs, and ancestors. Our ancestors cultivated farmland in the wilderness, cultivated it for irrigation and created a civilization, and all the food and clothing we created with our own hands on this land. So we don't thank God, only our ancestors who left us the land and culture, and we don't sacrifice to God but only our ancestors, because our ancestors are our gods, and this power is strong because of our faith. Our king, who reveres heaven and men and proclaims himself the Son of Heaven. This "heaven" is the principle of heaven, the king is the agent of the principle of heaven, the power of the monarch is subject to the principle of heaven, except for a few rampant lawless tyrants, the king of benevolence has always used the principle of heaven to restrain his desire for power. And we respect such kings, who either lead us to open up civilization with wisdom and benevolence, or lead us to resist foreign captives with unyielding determination, or lead us to resist foreign oppression with indomitable will, get rid of those Tatars, and rebuild our China.

So unlike other civilizations that pray for God's sacrifice, we will use all of our resources to defend our land, our culture, our society, which our ancestors left us. As a covenant with our ancestors, we must pass on the sacred land and immortal culture to our children and grandchildren. Therefore, we will defend our civilization, whether rich or poor, no matter how powerful, murderous, vile and cunning. On the contrary, those civilizations that believe in gods, when they are in power, they cannot conquer and integrate other peoples, and once they are unlucky, their own gods are no longer powerful, as long as they see that others have more powerful gods, those tribes that have no blood relationship and rely on the chaotic power of strange gods will immediately run around like monkeys. With a wave of his hand, the so-called firm faith vanished. And we are the descendants of Yanhuang who are condensed with blood, so we will never give up the glory and glory of China from generation to generation. As for the strange thoughts that are unreasonable in the answers and comments, it is very simple, the Buddha should kill the Buddha, and the demon should block and kill the demon.

The error-free chapters of "Fighting in the Wizarding World" will continue to be updated in the hand-hit bar, and there are no ads in the site, so please collect and recommend the hand-to-play bar!

If you like to fight in the wizarding world, please bookmark: () Fight in the wizarding world.