The reader's question, admittedly, is that this book is indeed written a bit of fantasy. However, in this novel, I also mentioned that the problem with fantasy is because all hackers are written with the code of a visual attacker, so...

I don't know if you readers have read it very seriously?

If you don't write it that way, for example, a multi-channel attack stream will instantly push the opponent's firewall. Are you satisfied with this description?

Of course, since this issue has been mentioned by readers, this kind of description will also be reduced in the writing of novels in the future, except for the war scenes, of course, otherwise it will be too boring.

Of course, if you crack those things, you will also use some unprofessional words, I hope you readers, forgive me.

Also, I haven't read two finished hacker novels so far, but I also love hacker novels quite a lot, so I hope that all readers will support you greatly.

I heard that if the ratio of clicks to recommendations is too large, it is a forced eunuch.

So if you have a ticket, smash it for me.

Well, thank you.