Wang Jian knows thirteen kinds of spells, which can generally open this door.

Fire is the simplest of the most violent.

The more elegant way is to find the door lock, freeze it with an ice spell, and then roast it on the fire, which is not bad.

"Anyone. ”

Wang Jian chose to knock on the door.

However, Wang Jian found that the door was just opened.

It was pushed open by the force of the knock on the door.

Sliding door, good habits.

The door is pulled inward and extrapolated.

Wang Jian's former friend, Erika, said that the vast majority of Japanese doors are push-out doors.

That is, when you go out, you can push it directly, and when you come to China, you are not used to it, and the source of this habit is also very simple.

Japan is a country with many earthquakes, and when the earthquake comes, the reaction time is very short, so not a single second can be wasted, so, according to the human body, in the process of running, it is best not to stay and delay time, and if it is the kind of door that is pulled into the house, it will be too delayed, and pushing the door is more suitable for escaping.

It's called detail.

This detail made Wang Jian feel a little relieved, and he also lifted his heart.

It seems to be a "civilized" person, but it is the civilized person who worries about it.

It doesn't seem to be clean, it doesn't look like it's a long-term residence of people who love cleanliness, well, it feels.

It doesn't seem to be considered anything beautiful, but once you go in, there are three corridors, which are very straight.

Wang Jian walked seriously to the middle one.

Of course, grab a handful of stones in your hand, walk and throw one.

But I couldn't find anyone.

Although he kept shouting, "Is there anyone, is there anyone?" ”

There's no one at all.

However, the hallway, although dim, is clean and open.

It was clean and empty.

It's like a hall.

There are four places in the hall, and it is not clear to see.

Wang Jian is a man who has watched horror movies, so he naturally knows that in the death regulations, there is such a thing as looking through things that I don't know what it is, and the mortality rate is ......

However, this did not prevent him from making observations.

It's about three or four meters long, a little taller than the others, and it has a pitch-black appearance, so you can't see what it is, but it seems to be some kind of industrial product.

He's not a man who can't do it.

Keeping his footsteps ready to abscond at any time, Wang Jian took out the dragon horn sword from a long distance.

This thing can be deformed and can be used for a variety of purposes, such as at this point, you can take it to see what is going on here.

"Knock knock. ”

Nothing happened.

It's not bad, at least there are no dozens of lickers who come out to bite people.

Wang Jian did not continue to die, confirming that this was a solid, and it was well blocked, and that was it.

Not to die is a noble quality.

Lack of self-awareness, resulting in the current cognition of people who cannot recognize the direction of their own emotions, is prone to death.

The simpler the understanding of the world, the easier it is to die. The more solidified the understanding of the world, the easier it is to die. But if one understands the complexity of the world and discards the stereotyped notions around the people do not.

It is human nature to be "dead" and most people tend to attribute thrill-seeking practices such as skydiving, gambling, racing, drug use, and promiscuity to a lack of judgment. But in fact, many people with "sensory-seeking tendencies" seek stimuli because of biological and genetic predispositions. Studies have shown that sensory-seeking tendencies are influenced by biological traits and are shaped and stimulated by natural selection. When basic survival needs are met, humans do not stand still, but like other mammals, explore the natural and social environment around them. While this curiosity can put humans in dangerous situations, it also allows people to adapt to new environments more quickly and survive in harsh environments. Natural selection, survival of the fittest, and those who survive also retain this part of the adventurous gene.

There is also a relationship between liking "death" and chemical changes in the brain, and studies have found that the secretion of sex hormones directly affects people's stimulation-seeking behavior, and people with high sensory seeking have higher levels of sex hormones. Adolescents are in the period of physical development during puberty, and they have more hormones secretion, and they like stimulation and deviance. However, as teenagers mature and young adults age, the sex hormones in the human body also decrease, and they will prefer a stable life when they are old. So, to some extent, the tendency to feel seeking decreases with age. Say what is young and frivolous, want poetry and distance, like to be different, maybe it's just the excess hormone secretion back then...... Sex hormones in the human body affect behavior not only by affecting the central nervous system, but also by inhibiting monoamine oxidases, which affect the chemical composition of the brain. An enzyme in the brain that is responsible for managing monoamines. Many monoamine neurotransmitters, in turn, are concentrated in the limbic system, which manages mood and motivation. Sex hormones, acting as inhibitors, disrupt the normal functioning of monoamines, resulting in an increase in the concentration of monoamines such as norepinephrine and serotonin in the brain, and the person becomes more impulsive and actively seeking stimulation. Two studies have also demonstrated that people who are rated as high sensory seekers have a greater impact among sex hormones. The amount of ketones in men is much higher than in women, and the levels of MAO are relatively low, which makes men tend to be more likely to die than women......

Stupidity is not something of moral connotation, it is only a result. Because of our laziness and cowardice, and stupidity is then naturally exposed, not because of stupidity, but because of our laziness and cowardice.

A person behaves so stupidly that it can almost be concluded that he is very lazy in his thoughts. This kind of person is habitually content with the status quo and enjoyment, and in the long run, he gradually loses his basic common sense and judgment about anything and people. Not only that, but I am exaggerating, he will gradually lose his "vitality".

Normally, we are involuntarily overly dependent on others and books, both in our lives and in our thoughts. Our laziness seems to have sinked deep into our bones.

The ignorant are not innocent, and the "ignorant" is fully responsible for the consequences of "ignorance".

To think that ignorance can be opened is delusional.

Human moral intuition tells us that it is wrong to hurt others, and stupidity – in fact, here it refers more to a stubbornness that refuses to think critically and the resulting blind obedience to certain obsessions, which can lead to interference with the behavior of others and thus disgust.

For good, stupidity is a more dangerous enemy than malice. You can resist malice, you can remove its mask, or you can use strength to prevent it. Malice always contains the seeds of its own destruction, because it is always uncomfortable, if not worse. However, in the face of stupidity, there is no defense at all. To oppose stupidity, neither resistance nor strength will help, stupidity does not obey reason at all. If the facts are contrary to one's own prejudices, then there is no need to believe the facts, and if those facts cannot be denied, then they can simply be dismissed as exceptions. So compared to the villains, the stupid people are always smug. And he's easy to turn into danger, because it's easy to get him to punch. So, stupidity needs to be dealt with with with more care than malice. Let's not try to reason with fools again and again, because that is useless and dangerous.

To properly deal with stupidity, it is essential to recognize it for what it is. To be sure, stupidity is a moral defect, not an intellectual one. There are people who are intellectually superior but stupid, and there are people who are intellectually low, but they are not stupid, and we are surprised to find this as a product of certain circumstances. We get the impression that stupidity is cultivated, not innate, and that stupidity is cultivated in circumstances in which people make themselves stupid or allow others to make themselves stupid. We further note that stupidity is much more prevalent among individuals or groups who tend or are destined to live or associate in groups than among unsociable or lonely people. From this point of view, stupidity is a sociological problem, not a psychological one. It is a special form of the role of the historical environment on people, a psychological by-product of specific external factors. If you look further, you will find that any violent revolution, whether political or reliant, seems to cause a great deal of stupidity among a large number of people. In fact, it has almost become a law of psychology and sociology. The power of one side needs the stupidity of the other. It is not an innate ability of human beings, such as the intellectual faculties, that have been hindered or destroyed. On the contrary, it is the upsurge of power that has become so terrible that it deprives people of independent judgment, and people give up (more or less unconsciously abandoning) their own efforts to evaluate new state of affairs. A fool may often be stubborn, but we must not mistake him for independence. One feels, more or less, especially when talking to a stupid man, that it is simply impossible to talk to him personally, to have a heart-to-heart conversation with him. When you talk to him, you don't come across him, but a series of slogans and things like that, which have the power to control him. He has been deceived by others, his eyes have been blinded, his humanity has been exploited and ruined. Once he surrendered his will and became a mere instrument, there was no limit to sin that a fool would not reach, but he still could never understand that it was sin. There is a danger here that demonically distorts human nature, and it can cause irreparable damage to man.

It is in this regard, however, that we realize that the foolish cannot be saved by education. All he needed was salvation, and nothing else. So far, attempts to persuade him with rational arguments have been of no avail. In this state of affairs, we can fully understand why it is futile to try to discover what the "people" are really thinking, and why the question is completely redundant for those who think and act responsibly.

The real difficulty is that stupid people don't think they're stupid, so a lot of times we don't really know which side we belong to. When we are anxious about the stupidity of others, others think the same way. Lately I've felt like I'm smarter, because I can sense a part of my stupidity.

Suppose all of us are in the same boat. If one of them likes to poke himself with an awl, the captain may do as he pleases, as long as he does not encourage others. If there is a man who likes to poke someone with an awl, then the captain will tie him up and lock him up to prevent innocent people from being injured. If a person likes to poke the bottom of the boat with an awl, then I'm sorry, and if you don't change it, you can only throw him off the boat. The same. If a person's ignorance only harms himself and does not cause trouble to others, then he can have the right to be ignorant. If a person's ignorance hurts those around him, then his foolishness should be forbidden and he should be isolated. If a person's ignorance will harm the public interest, he must be punished and admonished, and in extreme cases, it is justified to give him a bullet.

Choice is one thing, and so is cognition. If a child is allergic to seafood, but the child's parents do not fully realize the seriousness of the food allergy, and feel that "exercise" can change the child's allergy physique, forcing him to eat a large amount of fish and shrimp, resulting in the child being hospitalized due to allergic reactions, this can be said to be a manifestation of ignorance. If there is a so-called "right to ignorance", there will be an argument that parents have the right to choose how to raise their children, and no one else can interfere with them. But if you ask the parents of this poor child, do they really want their child to be hospitalized or even killed? Not necessarily, they may be motivated by the good of the child, thinking that they want to give the child good food to enhance their physique, and if they are fully aware that they know that allergies cannot be changed by "exercise", then they may not make the same choice. In this context, society should consider how to ensure that everyone is clearly aware of the consequences of their choice, rather than prevaricating with the phrase "the right to choose".

Remaining ignorant is also a vague concept, but something that seriously violates social consensus and basic common sense can be considered ignorant in most cases. There is some ignorance that involves outdated ideas and wrong knowledge, and in this case I think it is the duty of man to help others get rid of their ignorance. The Prophet praised wisdom and believed that people had the right to be free from ignorance and pursue wisdom. Therefore, we must respect differences in values, but people have the obligation to expose and criticize certain harmful and outdated views and erroneous and misleading information, such as "acid-alkaline birth of men and women," which is harmful to the birth rate of girls and has feudal superstitious overtones; all kinds of erroneous and ignorant ideas that verify chastity and advocate the observance of festivals rather than death must be eliminated; homosexuality, sexual minorities are diseases, and the inferiority of colored people is also wrong and discriminatory thoughts, which in themselves do not have the basic premise of being respected. In short, the individual has the personal freedom to remain ignorant, but the freedom should be limited to the basis of not endangering the safety and quality of life of others, but if ignorant thoughts and statements are published in public, any person of conscience should stand up against them.

The error-free chapters of "Fighting in the Wizarding World" will continue to be updated in the hand-hit bar, and there are no ads in the site, so please collect and recommend the hand-to-play bar!

If you like to fight in the wizarding world, please bookmark: () Fight in the wizarding world.