There are three main ways to determine whether a work is a hit. The best way is to find an editor after writing an opening, and show the editor the beginning and his own creative ideas, so that he can judge whether the work has a future.

The second option is to find a friend and ask them to read the beginning of the work and listen to their opinions. After all, these people are also part of the reader, and their opinions are more or less representative of the thoughts of a part of the reader. It's just that this method may not be accurate, especially when friends know whose work it is, there will be subtle changes in psychology that affect their judgment. So, if you show it to a friend, the opinion can only be used as a reference, and besides, try not to let them know whose work it is beforehand.

The third way is to effectively improve your vision, combine the YY points mentioned above, and combine your own feelings about popular works, and compare and compare, so as to judge the level of your works. Of course, this approach is more likely to be biased, and it is best not to use it as the main basis for judgment.

It is best to use these three methods in combination to comprehensively judge the prospects of the work. After that, if you are confident in your work, you can save more manuscripts. If most people say it's not good-looking, then you should upload it as soon as possible and see how readers react first.

In addition, the speed of writing is also an important factor in determining how much manuscript to save. If you write quickly, you can naturally save less manuscripts. If you can keep your speed and writing consistently, you can even skip the manuscript - of course, if you have some, it's good.

In a sense, manuscript storage is actually a kind of adjustment and supplement to the speed of writing. I often hear some authors complain, saying that the starting point is the world of fast gunners, and the reason why their works can't heat up is because of the lack of speed. Editors laugh at this kind of remarks, but in fact, what really affects the popularity of the work is the quality of the work itself. The speed of writing, and the amount of manuscript stock mentioned here, is only an auxiliary thing, and does not occupy a major position. It is not uncommon to update the works that are fast and the works that are updated to the speed of the turtle have more than 10,000 subscriptions. Moreover, after there is a saving manuscript, speed should not be an excuse, no matter how slow you write, why not save more manuscripts? Wait until you've finished writing the whole book and then send it, isn't it how much speed you want? So, even if your lack of popularity is really due to the problem of speed, then you can only blame yourself for your improper business strategy.

Let's talk about the number of submissions that need to be deposited at each stage. Note that the number mentioned is based on the premise that the writing speed is extremely slow, and the author's new writing is not added, and if you write fast enough, these numbers can be reduced accordingly.

After the new book is put into the library, you must first have 30,000 words in the manuscript, so that your work can quickly enter the editing background and be reviewed by the editor as soon as possible. Then when rushing the list, the total number of words should be more than 50,000, so as to meet the conditions for being on the list, in addition, 70,000 words is a criterion for applying for Sanjiang's recommendation. If the number of words is enough, you can apply for Sanjiang recommendation first, if you can, you must be able to ensure more than two changes a day, preferably three changes a day, so that in a week, you need 30,000 to 40,000 words of manuscript. After that, it is the seven days of strong pushing, and in these seven days, it is best to do three changes a day, that is, 45,000 manuscripts. After that, it's on the shelves.,It's very advantageous to have a fast update speed in the early days of the shelves.,First, you can make up enough 60,000 words in the VIP as soon as possible.,Resume the public version update.,The second is to make the chapters in the VIP look less chilly.,Please readers.。 This part of the manuscript, 20,000 to 50,000 words, is more appropriate.

Therefore, all things considered, before uploading a new book, there are 100,000 words of deposit, which is basically enough. If you want to be a little more insured, save 150,000 words. And if you really don't have confidence in yourself, then start uploading when you have 50,000 words, this number is the bottom line.

It is necessary to save the manuscript during the new book period, and it is also important in the following three periods. One is a strong recommendation, such as when the seal is pushed. It was a great waste that there were fewer updates in those two days. The second is the period of travel or planned activities. Until then, it's a good idea to have a small amount of stock and then have the editor update it on your behalf while you're away. At this time, the update can be slowed down a little, but definitely not stopped, otherwise, it is very detrimental to the subscription. The third is when the work is about to end. At this time, a little manuscript storage allows the author to write a new book while dragging the old work down, and when the old work is finished, the new book should also have a certain number of manuscripts, which can be uploaded to the library, avoiding the time difference in the middle, which is very helpful for stabilizing readers.

Sixth, what should I do with the work of the street

This is a situation that all authors are unwilling to face, but who it is, must be taken into account. What should I do if the work is on the street? Do you insist on writing it down, or do you go straight to the eunuch?

Neither option is advisable. This article is mainly about how to write a book to make money, so if you are sure that the work is no longer useful, it is admirable to keep writing, but it is not a very wise behavior. Some open-minded authors will say, I just think it's a practice pen. It's naturally good to think like this, but even if you're a newcomer, you can combine practicing writing and making money.

Compared with insisting on writing it down, direct eunuchs are the other extreme. From the perspective of long-term development, eunuchs are even more unwise, firstly, this will leave a bad impression on the readers, reduce the reader's confidence in the author's next work, and secondly, it is more or less a "stain", and the editors will use it as a basis for reference when applying for a contract or something else in the future.

Therefore, the most reasonable thing to do is to finish it in time. If you are sure that the work has no future, then you can consider the ending, and cut the plot you thought of before, as much as possible, and as brief as possible. even directly arranged some accidents for the protagonist, for example, let him get an adventure and suddenly have an epiphany, or suddenly increase his strength, so he flew to the fairy world and never returned to the world. This kind of anticlimactic ending will cause a backlash from some readers, but after all, it is better than a eunuch.

In addition, some authors will attach great importance to their debut novels, and they don't want to end here, and they want to come back one day to revise and update, so that they can add a suspension announcement at the end of the work, indicating that the work is going to be overhauled, and there will be no updates for the time being, please understand. It is better to have an explanation than to be a eunuch without saying anything. Of course, it would be best if the author could write the ending first and let the work come to an end. If you want to go back and rewrite it later, it's perfectly fine, and the whole book doesn't prevent you from revising it.

The above is a treatment of the works of the servant street. I would like to add here that the author's judgment of the servant street must be very cautious, whether the work is good or bad, it is his own painstaking work, and do not easily draw conclusions and let it become a waste. There are two situations that cannot be used as a basis for the work to serve the street.

First, the popularity was dismal in the early days of uploading. Now there are more than 70,000 works at the starting point.,The works in the update are also a huge number.,In this case,The updated chapters can only stay on the home page for a while before they will be brushed down.,And the list of updated works on the home page,In fact, it's not the focus of readers' attention.,Therefore,In the case of no recommendation of the work、Lack of advertising,No matter how low the popularity,It doesn't mean anything.。 Only after the work has been strongly advertised, or has been recommended, and the final score is much lower than the average level, then the service street can be determined.

The second is that the application recommended by Sanjiang Pavilion is rejected. Here is to emphasize that the Sanjiang list is not a commercial list, and passing the Sanjiang review does not mean that the work can be popular, and it is rejected by Sanjiang, nor does it mean that the work is on the street. This is something that newcomers should understand.

7. How to apply for Sanjiangge recommendation

There are often signed authors who come to say, help me arrange a Sanjiang recommendation next week. When encountering this kind of request, the editor directly replied with two words: no. It's not that they don't want to help the author, in fact, many of the rejected authors are key authors that the editor values very much, and the editor will fight for every possible recommendation opportunity for him, but Sanjiang recommends it, not among them.

Sanjiang Pavilion recommendation is independently reviewed and operated by Sanjiang editors, and no editor has the right to interfere with it in any form, even if it is only to recommend some works to Sanjiang editors after work, it is absolutely not allowed. Therefore, no matter who wants Sanjiang to recommend, you have to go to the author area to apply, even if the editor writes the book himself, if you want to recommend it, you have to apply according to the procedure.

The author's resentment against Sanjiang Pavilion has not been broken since the beginning. There are those who say that Sanjiang's editors are incompetent, and there are those who say that Sanjiang recommends black-box operations, and all kinds of strange remarks have a certain market. What I want to say here is that Sanjiang's recommendation is not an author's benefit. For non-contracted authors, the author provides the work as the starting point to increase traffic, and the starting point provides a stage for the author to play, which is the cooperative relationship between the two parties. Although the author has to pay hard work, the starting point also has to invest money in hardware facilities such as servers, and to invest manpower in the maintenance and operation of the website, and the starting point is not obliged to recommend publicity to non-contracted authors, and even, even if it is a contracted author, the starting point is only to ensure publicity, not to be sure that he can give him any recommendation.

Sanjiang recommendation is a personalized list, a list that reflects personal tastes. As mentioned above, Sanjiang's recommendation is not what the author deserves, it is just an opportunity for new books to be selected from the starting point, and it is naturally a good thing to be selected, and there is no need to complain if you can't be selected.

One of the main principles of Sanjiang's recommendation is to take care of new books, so all works with a certain number before a certain number are not allowed to apply for Sanjiang, and this number will increase with the number of works at the starting point. Despite this, there are still many authors who believe that Sanjiang is bullying newcomers, because many of the selected works are new books by old authors, and almost all the works of those big-name authors can be on the list, which is also an important basis for the author's attack on the starting point of the black-box operation. In fact, it is not without reason that old authors are easy to apply successfully. In general, they are more familiar with the rules of the starting point, and they know how to operate and how to cater to them, so that they are naturally more likely to succeed.

So, how can I make it easier to apply? First of all, the standard recommended by Sanjiang is to take literariness as the core, and the quality of the text comes first. Therefore, if it is a simple YY stream, a work that improves the speed by reducing the quality of the text, generally do not consider applying for Sanjiang. Because of this, there is a small link that will help improve the success rate of the application if it is done well, that is, try to make the page as tidy as possible, make the work look more formal, reduce the typo rate, reduce oral language and Internet language, reasonable segmentation, reasonable use of punctuation - all of the above are small problems, but if you pay attention, then it will be of great help to the application.

Secondly, the subject matter is also an important criterion for Sanjiang's audit. In fact, this is more important than words. It is not that certain subjects are easy to apply for, but on the contrary, if certain subjects are involved, the application will not be successful. If it is an erotic work, especially a work with eroticism as the main line, and a work with an obvious ambiguous hint in the title of the book, Sanjiang will not pass. In addition, the works of the same people are basically ignored by Sanjiang. Thirdly, it will be slightly more difficult to apply for online games.

In addition to the text and subject matter, it is a little secondary, but it is still important to be creative in the work. Generally speaking, works that seem to be relatively new are more likely to pass the review, and if they are written about old-fashioned themes and rely on skill to win, under the same circumstances, they will be cut.

Finally, there is the commerciality of the work. Compared with the above points, this is a relatively minor factor, and it is only under the same conditions that commerciality will be considered, that is, more popular works will be recommended first.

The above points are the problems of the work itself. Outside of the work, there are still some things to pay attention to.

First of all, it is the time to apply for a recommendation. According to Sanjiang's regulations, the main text must exceed 70,000 words when applying for recommendation, and if it is delayed too late and exceeds the ISBN standard, you will not get the opportunity to apply. And if it is delayed and the contract is signed first, then Sanjiang will also give priority to other works. Therefore, in general, when the number of words in the work is between 70,000 and 150,000, the application is more appropriate, and if the scope is narrowed down a bit, then it is the easiest to apply when the number of words is roughly 80,000 or 90,000 words.

In addition to the word count problem, the time of application is also particular, because in the second half of every week, especially on Thursday and Friday, the starting point of various lists has been set, and Sanjiang recommendation is naturally no exception. Therefore, to improve the success rate of the application, it is best to apply in the first half of the week, that is, Monday and Tuesday.

In addition, when applying for Sanjiang recommendation, you must fill in the title of the work and your own contact information clearly to facilitate the editor's contact, otherwise, the editor will not find anyone, and you will suffer the loss.

Finally, don't be discouraged if the application is unsuccessful, after all, Sanjiang does not represent commercial, and if the application fails, you can apply for another contract, or you can apply for Sanjiang again after a while. It is important to note here that it is best not to apply repeatedly in a short period of time, because the same editor will review the application, and if you apply repeatedly, you will only be rejected again and again, and even let the editor remember the book, which will be more difficult to pass in the future.

8. How to apply for a contract

Applying for a VIP contract is the same as applying for Sanjiang recommendation, and it is also applied in the special channel in the author area. However, it is completely different from Sanjiang that the VIP signing criteria are completely based on the commerciality that Sanjiang values the least, as long as the work has a high popularity potential, then even if the text is poor, or a little erotic, it will not affect the VIP application. Sanjiang basically won't consider the martial arts fandom theme, and there is also the possibility of applying for VIP success.

As for what kind of books have commercial potential and what kind of books are easier to sign successfully, this point is actually included in the royal chapter, so I won't say much here.

In addition to the quality of the work itself, if you apply for a VIP contract, the number of words of about 100,000 is the most suitable, but the specific number of words depends on the content of the work. Some books entered the play earlier and showed enough selling points very early, so it would be better to apply for such works earlier. For those slow-burning works, it's best to wait for the plot to unfold and show the excellence of the work before applying.

Compared with the Sanjiang application, there is no time to apply for VIP, from Monday to Sunday, you can apply on any day.

In addition, there are two more points to emphasize here: first, the failure to apply for Sanjiang's recommendation and the low data of the work will not affect the success rate of applying for the contract, Sanjiang does not represent commerciality, and in the absence of recommendation, it is completely normal for the work to be less popular, and the editor's judgment is based on the commercial potential of the work, not the current performance; The second is that after the application is unsuccessful, it is best to re-apply after a while, if you apply once a day, it will only cause the editor's disgust, after all, the changes that can be made in one day are very limited, and it is difficult for anyone to believe that the work can be changed in one day.

9. How to make friends with big-name authors

As mentioned in the advertisement above, it is more advantageous to exchange advertisements with popular works. It's just that behind popular works are big-name authors, and big-name names are often understood as being high-minded, putting on a show, and playing temper, so is it possible to get their advertisements?

According to the editors, this is difficult, but not completely impossible. In fact, most of the authors of the starting point are very amiable - even those platinum authors - do not put on a show, and are polite to people. Of course, these authors are often very busy and spend little time chatting, and if you don't know them, it is very unwise and rude to rush to add them and beg them to advertise just by getting a Q number.

To make friends with those authors, the best way is to wait for the rabbit in the author group, although big-name authors generally rarely appear in the group, but occasionally they will come out to breathe and relax. It may be difficult to wait for a certain author, but it is not difficult to find an author with a high subscription. After those authors come up, you can chat with them in the group, mix their faces, and after a few times, wait for them to have a little impression of you, and then ask for an advertisement, and some authors will agree.

In addition, there is a better way to reach out to those authors directly, and that is to become their fans. Whether you are a real fan or a hypocritical fan, in short, be sure to read the author's work carefully. It should be explained here that the main purpose is not to let newcomers please the old authors, but for newcomers, the works of those popular authors are indeed very worthy of study, and it is beneficial to read their works carefully.

After reading the work, you will have some thoughts, whether you think the best writing is good, or where you feel that there are deficiencies in the book, you can mention it to the author, of course, remember to be tactful when making criticisms. These opinions can be privately chatted with the author during the chat, or you can leave a message to the author, the general principle is that if it is of a complimentary nature, it is better to put it forward publicly, such as posting on the forum, or speaking in a group; And if it is critical in nature, it is better to communicate privately. Either way, the author is very welcome, and for them it is natural to be happy to receive real praise, and the suggestions made by loyal readers are also valuable, and they are in need of the help of some readers who can give real opinions.

However, I also want to remind you here that if the so-called things gather people in groups, if the difference in strength or popularity is too great, it is difficult to become real friends, and it is difficult to really integrate into each other's small circles. Therefore, for newcomers who have just entered the industry, it is completely feasible to directly find the author of the biggest name to advertise, but it is limited to this kind of small help, if you want to really make friends with them, and even integrate into the circle of high-end authors, you have to rely on your own efforts, step by step development, so that you have enough capital.

In addition, if you want popular authors to help advertise, you must first ensure that they are pleasing to the eye, and it is very important to clean the façade of the work as mentioned in the packaging section above. At the very least, the authors had to come and take a look at it, and they felt generally comfortable, and they didn't think it would embarrass them.

10. How to treat readers' book reviews correctly

Writing a book is naturally meant to be read by others, and when there are more people reading it, there will naturally be likes and dislikes, so all kinds of comments follow.

For many authors, dealing with readers' book reviews is a very contradictory thing, and some reviews are fluttering, only to find out that they are a panacea; Some comments are sincere compliments, which make people feel comfortable in their hearts, but they are easy to get lost; Some criticisms hit the nail on the head, but they make people's blood pressure rise; Some comments are really uncomfortable to look at, but if they are deleted, they will cause a bigger backlash......

Dealing with readers' book reviews is first and foremost a question of whether to read or not. This is mainly based on the psychological capacity of the author. If you are psychologically fragile and will be sad when you see all kinds of criticism or abuse, or even be made unable to write books or eat, then simply don't read any comments, and close every time you log in to the author's area, close it directly after updating a new chapter, out of sight and out of mind. And if you have a strong psychological capacity, then reading a book review is still very beneficial, although there are also many fake flattery and malicious troublemakers in book reviews, but there is also no shortage of truly valuable reviews. Although the author has the most say in the work, but readers can look at the problem from different angles and different positions, and often put forward some pertinent suggestions that the author can't think of.

It's a pity not to read the message, but what if you have poor psychological endurance and don't want to let go of this opportunity to improve, and don't want to let the hard work of loyal readers go to waste? A more feasible way is to find a trusted friend to manage the book review area, let him handle the various book reviews, and select really constructive opinions among them, sort them out, and then pass them on to the author. In this way, the author can avoid being depressed when he sees some excessive messages, and can get all kinds of effective reader feedback. Of course, this friend must be trustworthy.

In fact, there's no need to get too angry at readers' criticism. In general, their criticism will be as follows:

The first is well-intentioned criticism, which is the improvement opinions put forward by some book lovers on the work, and for the author, this kind of criticism is actually difficult to change, which not only reflects the value of the work, but also is an important evidence for the author to effectively improve the level of writing. Readers who can write this kind of book review are lovely, and we have no reason to hate them.

The second is blind criticism. For example, some readers do not read the book carefully, and follow others to coax them. It's infuriating, but on second thought, we don't need to pay attention to it. These readers haven't read the work seriously, so their criticism is just a fart, so why bother too much? Just because there is this kind of criticism does not mean that the book is bad.

The third is the harassment of boring people and the malicious troublemaking of people with ulterior motives. These reviews tend to be dominated by unreasonable invective, and they are often vague in content and vulgar in language. It's normal for us to be annoyed, but there's no need to be too angry about it, as long as we think about it, those who come to make trouble actually increase the clicks of the work in disguise, increase the popularity of the work, then our psychology will be much more balanced. To put it another way, if someone is making trouble, it means that your work is strong enough to block someone's wealth, or it is so popular that it makes them blush. If you can think like that, then I believe you will not be so angry.

Of course, if you don't get angry, you don't get angry, and these malicious comments still need to be dealt with, because if left unchecked, they may drive public opinion and cause an unfavorable situation. However, this kind of criticism must be handled with caution, mainly to distinguish between the dissatisfaction of ordinary readers and the remarks of malicious troublemakers. If it is the former, then the comment can be deleted, but it is best to communicate with the reader, explain your thoughts by sending text messages on the site, etc., and thank him for his suggestion; And if it is the latter, then it must be resolutely suppressed, not only to delete the book review, but also to ban him if necessary, and even, if the circumstances are particularly serious, you can also retain the evidence, directly complain to the official, and let the official block.

Finally, I would like to add that the author should have his own opinions, not be too easily swayed by the comments of others, and not dismiss his work because of the comments of some readers, after all, no matter who he writes, what he writes cannot be perfect, and it is impossible for everyone to praise him. Therefore, before accepting other people's suggestions to modify the work, it is best to be cautious and think more about it yourself, and many times it is not necessarily a good thing to listen to others to revise it.

11. On erotic depictions

Here, I don't want to preach as an editor, tell everyone that erotic depictions are not good like a child, and tell everyone that there is no benefit in writing this kind of thing, so everyone should not write. In fact, erotic depiction is a double-edged sword, which has positive meanings, but also negative effects. In this regard, as mentioned above, adding this kind of description will obviously help the popularity of the work, especially in the early stage, which is very good for the work to hit the list, but at the same time it also restricts the further development of the work and restricts the work from getting more and better recommendations. The choice depends on the type and characteristics of the work.

If the work itself is very attractive and has enough selling points in itself, then it would be wise to strictly control the erotic depiction, because such a work does not need to rely on this kind of side-by-side to attract popularity, and it does not involve erotic issues, it will also become the focus of official recommendations, and the benefits will be endless.

And if the content of the work is ordinary, lacks enough selling points, or the signs of the street are already very obvious, at this time, it is also worth considering adding erotic descriptions to save the scene, after all, at this time, it is no longer a matter of long-term development, but an imminent need for survival. Of course, we must grasp the problem of this degree here, and it must definitely be controlled within a range and cannot be exceeded. Once the eroticism is exceeded, once there is a criminal record, the editor will strictly control the author's work from now on, and there will be some concerns when arranging recommendations, which obviously outweighs the loss.

12. Key points for updating the works on the shelves

In general, there is no essential difference between the update of the VIP chapter and the public chapter, only slightly different in a few places.

The main difference is that the number of words in a single chapter does not have to be based on 2,000, so the first thing that should be considered is to reasonably divide the plot of the paragraphs and stop at the key points of each chapter. And without affecting the content, four or five thousand words per chapter is more appropriate, and if there are more, subscribing to the starting point of a single chapter will make the reader spend heartache, and if it is controlled below 10 starting coins, the reader will feel much better. In addition, it is not good if the number of words in a single chapter is too small, and it is troublesome for readers to read, and it is difficult to enjoy reading, and the more chapters are divided, the greater the possibility of a fractional number of words, which is easy to cause the loss of word count.

In addition, the big difference between the VIP chapter and the public chapter is that the VIP chapter is difficult to modify, especially the title error, the author himself cannot change it, and the error of the text is also troublesome, the revised word count must be more than the previous one, and even if it is corrected, it will affect the reading of readers who have subscribed before. Therefore, you must be cautious when uploading VIP chapters and confirm that they are correct before starting to upload. If you find that the chapter is wrong after uploading, then you can not publish it and unban it directly, which is equivalent to deleting the chapter and you can re-upload it. If it has already been published, it should be revised in time, or the wrong chapter should be solved in time, and the new chapter should be set to be free before being published.

To set up a free chapter, the correct way is to upload the chapter first, but don't click publish, and then contact your editor-in-charge to ask them to modify it to free and then publish it. In addition, there is another trick to set up a free chapter, which is to determine the correct title first, and then enter a character as the body to upload it, because the number of body text is less than 1,000 at this time, so the system is directly set to be free, at this time, you can use the modification function to modify the correct text, and then publish.

As for the lifting of the ban on VIP works, in addition to the regulations, the number of VIP words is less than 60,000 and the ban is not allowed to be lifted for less than two weeks on the shelves, other can be based on the actual situation of the author, for example, if the update speed is fast, the ban can be lifted slightly faster, and if the update speed is slow, the ban can be lifted quickly. In addition, if the work is in some particularly important recommended positions, it can be appropriately unbanned, especially when the public version is expected to hit the weekly list, it is still beneficial to unban more points. Also, when the subscription of the work is about to break through a certain level, you can also pause the lifting of the ban for a while, and then resume the update of the public version after the subscription is rushed.

The last point to mention is VIP deposit. Some authors think that there is no need to save the manuscript after it is put on the shelf, and it is still more dangerous to write as much as you want, once the author has any accidents, such as illness, busy work, friends visiting, computer damage, etc., if the update is suspended for a while, it will cause a very bad impact, and it will be directly reflected in the subscription. It is very difficult to recover the subscription that has declined in this situation, even if it is very difficult to guarantee recommendations and updates later. In addition, if you have the opportunity to make a big recommendation such as a seal push in the future, you can take the opportunity to update more manuscripts and make the most of the recommendation opportunities, which is very advantageous. Therefore, it is best to keep some manuscripts for the VIP part as well. Of course, whether it is the public or the VIP's deposit, you must pay attention to the backup to avoid unnecessary losses.

Finally, let's introduce the various lists of starting points:

The Sanjiang List is a literary recommendation list of new books that are open to all authors to apply, and it is updated every week (more than 70,000 words can be on the list, and there are book number restrictions, mainly new books)

The list of strongly recommended works selected every week at the starting point of the strong recommendation list (the most important list of new books, only signed works can apply)

The homepage covers the most valuable publicity, and the editors-in-chief of the three editorial departments at the starting point select excellent works among the works on the shelves, and do not accept applications

The starting point of the weekly list is a list of the top 12 most popular works of the week

The starting point of the weekly recommendation is the list of works that receive the most attention from readers and receive the most readers' recommendation votes every week

The starting point of the weekly list of newcomer potential, the top 15 list of popular newcomer works every week

The starting point of the new book potential weekly list is the top 15 list of new books by old authors every week

The SMS Closure PK List is a list of popular works voted by readers' mobile phones, and the top four will get a two-day opportunity to block and push

The starting point of the girls' channel recommendation list is the recommendation list of outstanding works of female authors on the girls' channel, which is updated weekly

Starting Point VIP Works RecommendationStarting Point VIP Works Weekly Selection Recommendation List

The starting point of the VIP new work monthly pass ranking is the list of new books on the shelves of the current month selected by the monthly vote of VIP users

The advertisement is recommended by the slogan on the homepage, and the effect varies according to whether the slogan is attractive or not, and it is aimed at the works on the shelves

The last page pushes the cover recommendation on the last page of the reading page, for the works on the shelves

Finally, I wish you all the best in your work, fame and fortune!