If the protagonist is the president of a large company, then he will not have any relationship with the "lower class women" who have nothing to do with him. The only thing they have to do is www.biquge.info be hired and employed.

All cultural undertakings are strictly controlled by various bureaus and ministries to prevent the appearance of anything that is not "scientific" and "real". All articles are closely censored, and all articles are everyone's work, even if the protagonist is only one or two times more powerful than others, this is not okay, because this is not "real", not "scientific".

In Khabarovsky's previous life, there were 7.5 billion people in the world, but only 3,500 people were allowed to create works by the approval department. It was these 3,500 people who produced books for 7.5 billion people - at least a billion people.

Because many people are "dangerous" in their thinking, they always like to fantasize about things that are not "real" and "scientific", and they are also deprived of the right to read works. That's right, see clearly, it's "power" and not "right".

"According to Chapter VII of the Constitution of the Tang Democratic Republic, committing the crime of ideological danger is deprived of the right to read for three years and given a three-year suspended sentence. Deprive the right to apply for creation for life! ”

According to the universally accepted basic law, only a few novels – in fact only a few novels – are allowed to be read because they are "pure in thought", "scientific" and "true". The protagonist of any novel must find an archetype in reality. The abilities of any protagonist cannot exceed the maximum limit of the real prototype.

Any work that is not "scientific" and "real", once discovered, will be deprived of the right to create for life, and the maximum sentence will be death. Moreover, because of the purity of the blood of the pure-minded, their descendants cannot even apply for creative rights.

So after the appearance of "Dragon Quest", there will be such a big sensation. Why is this work, which is not "scientific", not "true", and not "pure" in thought, allowed to be published? Because in Northern Europe 1,500 years ago there were originals.

The following is a conversation between the thought censors and publishers of the time.

Ideological Censor: "I'm sorry, this work does not comply with the provisions of Chapter VII of the Constitution of our Tang Democratic Republic. It is neither "scientific" nor "pure", and it is "impure in thought", preaching religious superstitions, ghosts, gods and witchcraft, and it is not allowed to be published. And you, as the owner of this "Dangerous Thought" work, will be approved for arrest and immediately sentenced to death. ”

Publisher: "Why, sir?" Before I died, I wanted to know why. ”

Thought Censor: "This work you hold is not "scientific", it is not "real". ”

Publishers: Where is the "real" no? ”

Thought Censor: "There are no evil dragons in the world, and there are no brave people who are clearly more powerful than ordinary people. ”

Publisher: "What about the evidence?" ”

Ideological Censor: "According to the provisions of Chapter 781 of Chapter 49 of the General Law of the Tang Democratic Republic, the people of Datang have the obligation to participate in the population appraisal of the World Population Organization. According to the last 150 or 60 years, there has never been a human being so strong. ”

According to the research results of the World Geographic Organization, the so-called "evil dragon", "elf", and "witch" are even more illusory, and holding such things is a manifestation of "impurity" of thought. ”

Publisher: "But this is a newly unearthed work, created in Norway 1,500 years ago, and not even a single punctuation mark has been touched. ”

Thought Censor: "It is also a crime to possess a work that is "dangerous to thought". This work is extremely un"scientific" and not "real", and you will still be sentenced to death and executed immediately. ”

Publisher: "Where's the inauthenticity?" ”

Thought Censor: "There are no dragons or brave men in the real world, as has been said many times. ”

Publisher: "Were there princesses in ancient Norway?" ”

Censor: "Yes. ”

Publisher: "Are there princesses in modern society?" ”

Ideological Censor: "Since the rise of the revolutionary storm two hundred years ago, "all the immortal emperors have been defeated". Modern times are democratic societies, and people have the right to pursue happiness, so there are no princesses. You're highly educated, so you should know that. ”

Publisher: "There were princesses in ancient Norway, but there are no princesses in modern society." ”

Thought Censor: "Yes. ”

Publisher: "Was there a king in ancient Norway?" ”

Censor: "Yes." ”

Publisher: "Is there a king in modern society?" ”

The ideological censor was impatient: "These rotten things that are not "scientific" have long been swept into the garbage heap of history! ”

Publisher: "Is there or is it not?" ”

Thought Censor: "No! No! ”

Publisher: "Were there warriors in ancient Norway?" ”

The ideological censor suppressed the anger in his heart: "Yes. ”

Publisher: "Are there samurai in modern society?" ”

[Anyway, this ideological criminal is going to die, so why bother with him? Let him be. 】