The thought censor reluctantly continued to answer: "Yes." Pen %Fun %Pavilion www.biquge.info"

Publisher: "Were there brave men in ancient Norway?" ”

The thought censor hesitated for a moment: "It should ...... Perhaps, well, probably yes. ”

Publisher: "Are there brave people in modern society?" ”

A cold sweat broke out on the brains of the censors.

"This ...... This, this is really...... I don't know ......."

The publisher interrupted him: "Were there evil dragons in ancient Norway?" ”

The eyes of the thought censor regained their brightness: "No, no! I can be 100% sure that this one absolutely not! ”

Publisher: "Why are you so sure?" ”

Censor: "No dragon remains have been found in the excavated artifacts. And its life form is not "scientific". ”

Publisher: "How many years has it been since the Earth appeared?" ”

Censor of Thought: "Four thousand six hundred and twenty-eight million years." ”

Publisher: "How many species of life have appeared in total over the Earth's 4.6 billion years of life?" ”

Thought Censor: "This, all life...... I don't know. ”

Publisher: "Is it not clear to you, or is it not clear to everyone?" ”

The ideological censor was a little angry: "The level of science and technology of mankind is far from developing to this extent!" ”

Publisher: "It's just that everybody doesn't know. ”

Thought Censor: "Yes. ”

Publisher: "What can't be proven to have existed, just doesn't exist, right?" ”

Thought Censor: "Huh? How can you say that? Just because it can't be proved doesn't mean it doesn't exist. ”

The publisher nodded: "Is there an evil dragon in modern society?" ”

The thought censor was numb: "According to the study of the modern earth, such a thing that is not "scientific" cannot exist! ”

Publisher: "Were there evil dragons in ancient Norway?" ”

The thought censor was a little broken: "I've told you many times, no!" ”

Publisher: "Can modern society prove the existence of evil dragons?" ”

Ideological Censor: "How can you "prove" something that is not "scientific" or "real" at all? ”

Publisher: "Can modern society prove that dragons don't exist?" ”

Thought Censor: "How can you prove what you don't have?" ”

Publisher: "How can you say that it "doesn't" without something that has been studied experimentally, something that has not been thoroughly falsified? Your statement is not "scientific". ”

The thought censor was silent.

Publisher: "Can modern society prove that dragons don't exist?" ”

Censor: "No, because there is a lack of technical means to corroborate it." But that doesn't mean it really exists. ”

Publisher: "Is it something that can't be proven, something that never exists?" ”

Censor: "No. ”

Publisher: "How can you be sure that there must have been no dragons in history?" ”

Thought Censor: "This is not in line with common sense......"

Publisher: "Pay attention to your rhetoric, is the term "common sense" rigorous? Can scientific research be judged by "common sense"? ”

Thought Censor: "But who has ever seen a dragon in reality?" Modern social research can completely show that it is impossible for a monster like a dragon that can breathe fire and fly. ”

Publisher: "Is there a limit to science?" ”

Thought Censor: "No. ”

Publisher: "So, modern science hasn't come to an end, has it?" ”

Thought Censor: "Yes. Science is constantly evolving and improving, and it never ends. ”

Publisher: "What modern science can't prove, future science can't prove?" Never prove it in the future? ”

Censor: "No. Science changes with the times and never ends. ”

Publisher: "In other words, the science we recognize now is not necessarily entirely right. ”

The thought censor thought for a while: "Yes. ”

Publisher: "Can modern science prove that there were no evil dragons in ancient times?" ”

Censor: "No. ”

Publisher: "Modern science has proven that the statement that "there could have been no evil dragons in ancient Norway" is not necessarily entirely true, right? One day in the future, even with the slightest chance that this conclusion will be overturned? ”

Thought Censor: "Yes. But it's almost impossible......"

Publisher: "In other words, modern science cannot prove that there were no evil dragons in ancient times, and it is possible that future science will overturn the conclusion that "evil dragons do not have the conditions to arise" in modern society, right?" ”

Thought Censor: "Yes. But your statement is somewhat ......"

The publisher interrupted him: "Why did dragons exist in the literature of ancient Norway 1,500 years ago?" ”

The censor of thought trembled in his voice: "Because, because this is fiction, this is not "scientific", nor is it "real" ......"

The publisher raised his voice: "Then you mean that our ancestors were also "dangerous to thought"? They are also guilty of the "crime of thinking dangerous"? Their minds are also impure? Right, or not? ”