Guys, if you follow the pace of your mental exploration, it's been going on so far. You will find that the problems that seem to be clear can be more detailed and concrete. Specific to an expression, an action.

I've been wondering if this kind of meticulous work is necessary.

Should it be left to the reader to evolve and evolve on their own?

It is enough to rest on the content of "psychoanalysis".

If you think so, you don't have to go so far.

Because I think it's still necessary.

It's like when you feel like you're about to finish your job, but suddenly someone more important tells you, "This is just the beginning." Pen, fun, pavilion www. biquge。 info”

Although a little frustrated, the instinctive creative ability can continue to move forward; And not far-fetched.

It's not a big deal.

More importantly, the meticulousness and concretization of the work are still valuable to some people.

Unless his jumping thinking and tandem thinking are very well developed. Otherwise, rashly stating the conclusions of a psychoanalysis is enough to make him scratch his head.

For example, depression is due to the perversion of vomiting and excretion.

If we only stop at the meaning of psychological analysis and dreams and memories, we will not use jumping, inferences from one another.

There is no way to understand this conclusion.

But please don't think that this is another new insight.

It is just a continuation of the previous conclusion about the etiology of "breathing".

The purpose is just to evolve more intuitively and visually.

However, this kind of intuition and image is often misunderstood or even ridiculed by some people.

Just as Sigmund Freud used to put clouds, rivers, chests, stairs, stone pillars...... Metaphor for the pursuit of sex.

A lot of people dismiss this as nonsense.

It is considered that these symbolism are too absurd to make a connection, and it is impossible to prove it in practice.

The reality is that they don't know about it at all

Or too vulgar, it is polluting the human heart.

However, what is puzzling is that they regard those "spiritual" things, or "character determines fate", "people should go with the flow \ live in the present", "focus on practice """""" action to change understanding", "XX personality", "the difference between introversion and extroversion", and other doctrines""""" as stable truths as chimes.

It's like solving a complex criminal case.

If you draw a conclusion based on the situation at the scene, it must be related to the crime.

I believe that most people will think that it is correct.

Positive.

But if someone wants to track down the details, it may attract some people to mock and ridicule.

will think that this person is stealing the limelight, or being unconventional. And nature shows some irony.

This psychology of refuge often leads people to avoid the pursuit of truth and indulge in illusory and detached beliefs.

Just like many people with mental illness, they don't care about what the psychiatrist says, as long as he is slightly right, they worship him as a god.

This is because they simply treat psychiatrists as a substitute for the dependency that has collapsed in their hearts.

A conscious external dependence, rather than a dependence on the unity of mind and body.

In fact, these psychological and physiological deductions are carried out under the instinct of the person being analyzed.

Rather than mechanical mathematical, chemical, biological reasoning.

As long as one's instinct gains pleasure and relief.

There is no point in the outside world "science" to intervene.

Let's get back to the topic.

Many people with mental illness may feel vomiting when they are depressed.

This vomiting is actually a repressed verbal urge to release.

As mentioned earlier: a man will hold his breath or swallow his anger when he encounters something dirty, or fearful, or is worried that his mother will be threatened by the outside world. It was like an obstacle stuck in his throat, and he couldn't make a sound of resistance.

Because once it erupts, it will involve the mother, and she will be threatened, and she will be powerless to protect herself.

So, vomiting is just an instinctive urge to release pent-up.

More specifically, the instinctive drive to want to break through the throat barrier.

If you don't know this.

Most people just think of vomiting as a pathology.

And it makes the patient more fearful and worried.

Worry about your condition getting worse.

Some scholars advocate "going with the flow"

That is: vomit when you want to. It's not a big deal, I can't die anyway.

This looks like accepting vomiting as an instinctual release.

But in reality, it is a pretense of "indifference" and "detachment"

It is a reluctant compromise made in a painful situation.

Wait until the reality is slightly better and it seems that vomiting will not occur again.

And they will be very strict about this kind of work. It's actually rejection of vomiting.

So, how do you associate vomiting with excretion?

Do you remember the previous example: a man wanted to go to the toilet in class? But because I was afraid, all eyes were on him. and so that he could not make the voice of the request. Hold it until you can't stand it anymore and excrete on the spot.

Here, the extreme suppression of excretion is equated with a sense of obstruction in the throat.

Therefore, in the future, his psychogenic vomiting symptoms are a disguised release of the original excrement.

That is, an explosion of courage.

No matter how powerful the external environment is, it cannot suppress this release of courage.

Because vomiting is difficult to restrain depending on the occasion.

This can also be expressed in another of his obsessive imaginations.

He often thinks of dirty things when he eats and food when he defecates.

In fact, it is this kind of inversion of the mouth and excretory organs, or a kind of replacement.

Due to the suppression of mouth and excretion, he is unable to resist those who threaten him.

I had to compromise with them too soon.

Invisibly make one's normal personality converge with the destructive behavior of the outside world, and forget the instinct to fight back, forming self-sabotage. and lead to depression.

But is it just a constant use of vomiting instead of normal instinctive release?

Not really.

Just keep a kind of primitive tranquility in the mother's "embrace" as a child.

Because of the tranquility. Therefore, when you are threatened by the outside world, or when your instinct needs to be released, you will naturally have the courage to speak and act.

This requires the "patient" to recall.

Why put a quotation mark on the patient, because after analyzing this, mental illness is no longer a disease at all, but just a natural expression of some instincts.

So, when people always feel that memories are useless and cannot change reality.

It's because they don't recall the original state at all.

And out of context, some fragments of memories are taken as the whole thing.

When people hear the words "mother" and "embrace", they take it for granted that this is a kind of childishness.

It's because they're overly formalized. Forget that the courage that sometimes comes naturally to adults comes from the unconditional self-confidence of childhood, that is, the unconditional trust in the mother's love and security. (To be continued.) )