The Soviet Union was the most bitter, as the first socialist country of mankind, relative to the world at that time, it was a large Israel, which was in a state of war before the founding of the state, with civil war and intervention army, without any foreign aid, and the enemy country.

It has no choice, it can't make pants, it can only go to heavy industry.

This kind of country surrounded by the enemy from the outside will only give priority to the development of agriculture and military industry, grain and munitions, which is the condition of survival, and light industry is the condition of enjoyment, and it will not be able to live.

But the USSR did not have money, foreign exchange did not have, and machines could not be bought. Due to the joint blockade, all mineral products are unsalable, and grain can only be sold for machinery. Even if heavy industry is built, there is no profit, the net investment is only for survival, but in order to survive, it has to sell rations, and it is not only China that tightens its belts and engages in industry, but the Soviet Union is the boss.

The ancestors of the Soviet intelligence service were not engaged in intelligence at all, and the original intention of the establishment of the Cheka was to rectify sabotage, and it is not good to be lazy and not work. The rural grain collection team is brutal, robbing its own peasants of grain for foreign machinery, but without this kind of fighting national tendon, the Soviet Union can use two five-year plans to become the first industrial power in Europe?

If you don't do that, you have to be prepared to be beaten by Nazi Germany as an indigenous person during the Great Patriotic War.

New China is also a hard time, the industrial and agricultural scissors are also cut to the countryside, no cutting, no capital, there is no way to develop industry, no industry is indigenous in the industrial age, industrial countries do not beat you are human, you are reasonable, you can't make the decision at all.

China's situation is even worse than that of the Soviet Union, with only a little industrial foundation in the northeast, not to mention the atomic energy of battleships, jet planes, and a kitchen knife in everyone's hand, and the simulation and calculation of atomic bomb data have to rely on abacus.

In addition to the internal exchange of materials from the socialist camp, the other side has uniform materials, and the outside is full of blockades, not to squeeze the potential of the country, where can the profits be turned up to engage in industry?

The break between China and the Soviet Union, the military industry on the third line was scattered, the real preparation was the base group, the militia division was a thousand, every city and every county had a set of small industries, and they fought their own battles, and for the sake of safety, they were dispersed, which reduced the overall industrial efficiency, and the atomic energy came out to breathe a sigh of relief.

If Britain, the United States, the Soviet Union, Germany, Japan, and China are worse than the other in the early stage of accumulation and development, no one should pretend to be innocent.

France is better, just that is also the Great Revolution pile of barricades, and then the usury empire is very comfortable to play, counting people's IOUs all day long, like to find natives to play is to annoy others to play with him, all day long to repair the Great Wall to block the door, others come to play either the emperor is lost or two weeks away.

If you want to be noble in front of people, you have to suffer behind your back, except for a few big families with oil under their feet, who can be an exception? Even if it is an oil tyrant, can it really be an exception?

It is that individuals know that human rights, freedom and democracy are good things, and if it is individuals, they are willing to enjoy happiness rather than suffering, and the key is why do you enjoy happiness?

A bunch of countries that do not have the core of their own civilization and do not have the ability to create civilization in their own ideas cannot compete with Europe and the United States, and they do not want to suffer the sins suffered by Europe and the United States, but they want to enjoy the same happiness as Europe and the United States. Isn't this an escape from competition?

Europe and the United States themselves will be eliminated if they escape competition, and their own citizens in Europe and the United States will be abandoned, not to mention a group of countries and fighters that are themselves lacking in competitiveness, and they dare to reduce their competitiveness.

The core of capitalism lies in the creation of demand, the constant creation of demand, which is a theory of infinite expansion of competitive comparison, which will never be satisfied.

This is also why modern rich people compared with ancient times, whether it is food, clothing, housing or enjoyment, they can be compared to princes, but they still will not be satisfied, where is the end of desire?

There has been enough discussion about democracy all over the world, and Tocqueville's sentence in his "On Democracy in America" that "the democratic system has made the jealousy hidden in the hearts of mankind grow and grow unprecedentedly" is a bit of the finishing touch, and he is not slandering American democracy, but on the contrary, praising this system. He was only afraid that equality would destroy freedom, and it was true that equality and freedom could only be chosen.

It's a system that stimulates desire and strife. Adams even pointed at Alexander. Hamilton's nose scolded him for being a stinking son of a Scottish peddler, and the Fathers of the Nation would discriminate against each other because of their origins, from spiritual to material, and even from birth, struggles and strife sometimes really came from jealousy.

Because new needs will be constantly created, competition will always exist, and as soon as it stops, it will be ruthlessly abandoned by society, the lower class yearns for the upper class, and the upper class society competes with each other more fiercely.

Evolved all the way, sheep, horses and cattle are all there, the saber-toothed tiger Tyrannosaurus rex is gone, and the pandas have changed to vegetarianism, because the carnivores are eliminated faster, and the only ones left are the crocodiles that can hide the most, and there is no end to the fight.

On the surface, the capitalist world is a system in which money has the final say, but in fact, whoever is backward will be abandoned, and the reform of the social system in all capitalist countries is actually a discussion of how not to abandon the eliminated.

However, the general rule of capitalism is competition, whoever evades competition violates the rules and will be eliminated by the capitalist world, so environmental protection, time-limited work, high salary, high welfare, etc., the higher the welfare, the more it is increasing the cost of competition and accelerating death, otherwise there is nothing to transfer the industry, which is also the reason for the turmoil in the capitalist world in later generations.

If you don't go to competition, competition will come to you!

IQ arrears can say that if the world can't stand the living standard of Chinese like Americans, then let Americans' living standards be the same as Zimbabwe, and the world will not stop.

Take the appearance to fool, there is no technical content at all.

Can the laws of capitalism allow for things that only rise and not fall, and avoid competition?

Yes, that's monopoly.

This is also the most wonderful solution sought by the capitalist world, from the national to the conglomerates and corporations.

However, the deeper the state monopoly, the more ferocious the plundering of foreign countries, and the more it will backfire as soon as it stops.

The deeper the monopoly of the consortium, the more the development speed will lag behind, the more it will be abandoned, and the greater the need to avoid competition.

What to do? This is not a problem that can be dealt with by an anti-monopoly law, it is a matter of core rules in the world of capital.

The philosophies of the world are also concerned with this layer of issues.

Jurgen. Habermas was born in Düsseldorf during the Weimar period to a middle-class family. Born with cleft lips, although corrected at an early age, he was unable to pronounce words clearly and severely affected his social life. However, it failed to affect his magnificent career as a troll.

From Hegel to Marx, from Aldono, Heidegger to Marx. Weber, finding that the ancients had no power to fight back, began to attack the heretical creatures with living characteristics. Pope, Lyotard, Foucault, Luhmann, Gadamer, Derrida, Bourdieu, Rawls and others continued to engage in fierce polemics, from the philosophical circles to the social sciences, to the reform of the European social democratic system, and he was also very good at integrating theory with practice, helping people to go to the election when he had spare time, and his combat effectiveness was bursting.

The old man was rated as the backbone of the second generation of the Frankfurt School, and was said by public opinion to have inherited and developed Kant's philosophy, devoted himself to reconstructing the Enlightenment tradition, regarded modernity as an unfinished project, put forward the famous theory of communication rationality, and carried out a profound dialogue and powerful criticism of postmodernism.

The reason why Yang Wei is interested in the old man is not because of the title of the old man, but because Habermas's theory has a characteristic, emphasizing that all development and discovery originate from interest, and real discovery comes from interest, rather than discovery for the sake of discovery.

Because of interest to understand the essence of things, because of interest so sincere, get a fair deduction, restore the essence.

That's pretty much why all the great companies of the modern era were created.

That's pretty much why there are so many successes out of interest.

What enlightenment did Habermas rebuild?

The Enlightenment originated from suspicion, and those who dared to doubt were members of secret societies in that Catholic Church era, what Illuminati, masonry Freemasonry, etc.

Later generations exaggerated these meetings, and compared with the power of the Catholic Church, Freemasonry, which was exaggerated to the extreme, was a hair, and compared with the power of the Church, it was like a bunch of rats gathering together for a meeting.

What has become of the Church in later generations, and the Masonic Masonic Synod still rules the world behind the scenes?

Freemasonry is a bit interesting, unique craftsman tradition, like to engage in compass ruler eyes everywhere, build a square to build a building to print a dollar banknote to hide marks, and ancient Chinese craftsmen like to engrave marks in works and mausoleums, European fake paintings like to hide names in imitations a hobby, Microsoft Chinese Chinese programmers also hide names, into a craftsman tradition.

It is certain that it has an impact on the world, but it is funny to say that Freemasonry rules the world, it is actually a salon-type club, and even the overseas Hongmen signboard has the Freemason logo, but Hongmen itself is very loose, and it does not listen to it internally and externally, can it really order overseas forces under the banner of Hongmen?

Freemasonry is more dispersed, because it has been in a state of secrecy under the blow of the Catholic Church for a long time, and it is normal to have a little sense of mystery, plus there are many celebrities, and there are many intersections with many things in history, but the early Illuminati is more mysterious than Freemasonry, and the Illuminati also has a bright top, and there are more celebrities, Copernicus is the Illuminati, and Freemasonry will be affected by the light.

But these will not be worth mentioning compared to the church, and the church can still have a crusade as soon as it is called, and where does the church and Western history not intersect? Who has more churches?

In the future, the church will not be able to rule the world, and it would be good if Italy did not take over the small city.

It is a common phenomenon for Westerners to participate in various religious sects, it is an individual who participates, and the infant is automatically admitted as soon as he is baptized, Hitler himself is still a Luciferian, and the swastika is the symbol of that faction, and when he comes to power and sweeps it, it is basically in the Nazi-ruled areas, and Freemasonry will immediately be over.

It was originally an assembly center, and it could discuss and do some things and influence some things, but it was 108,000 miles away from manipulating the world.