The secret that there is no surplus in socialism is also here,

It does not at all pursue the kind of sales profit after subtracting the cost from the selling price, which is of a business nature, and it is interested in the big cycle, and the total output value of industry and agriculture is all its profit, and of course the bigger the better.

This is also the reason why the socialist countries are so ferocious in engaging in industry, the cost tends to zero indefinitely, and they do not seek operating profits, which is not all of a sudden geometric explosive growth.

Li Hongzhang said that "the silver of China's shipbuilding is twice the price of foreign ships" is a typical agricultural thinking, and after a lifetime of foreign affairs, he can only see the appearance of industry, and what he sees is those guns and ships, and the factories are still comparing prices, and he does not know what the three words "industrial country" represent.

Boeing will order parts all over the world for the sake of cost, but whether it is Krupp in Germany or factories in the Soviet Union, it does not pursue cost, it depends on whether there is one. If you can produce it yourself, you can produce it yourself, and you can support it in China and never buy it out. I'm not afraid of a big enterprise, a kindergarten school is built casually, a bathhouse boiler is all right, and no matter how bloated it is, it is also an internal circulation, if you don't look at the structure, you will see it as a big pot of rice on the surface.

Capitalism and socialism have their own advantages and disadvantages, the advantages and disadvantages are equally obvious, the system is a tool, a knife, is to serve the people, and the fun depends on the specific player.

If you play well, you will become the United States, if you don't play well, you will be Zimbabwe, and Liberia with the Little Stars and Stripes will be taught by the United States, and there will also be a West Point, and the beach is full of. The same is true in the Philippines, where institutional determinism is very.

People are playing with knives, how can they let the knife play, if it doesn't fit the hand, the four words of Chinese characteristics are typical Chinese wisdom, this is blank, this is water, this is not smart, this is wisdom, many foreigners are confused by playing with Chinese characteristics.

Chinese this point is particularly interesting, not more serious, as long as you give money, believe in anyone, God Jesus Mazu Rulai Buddha at will, out of the church to carry a pig's head to worship the Buddha, Western-style education out of the home decoration still look at feng shui first.

There are bad things and good things about this kind of character, and it is also a two-sided thing, blessings and misfortunes depend on each other, and there is no absolute thing.

The interpretation of industry in socialist countries has led to the production of the Soviet Union's book trade ruble and the material allocation system, which is aimed at the operation structure of the planned economy under the socialist main system.

After China's reform and opening up, the dual-track price system has also caused a lot of trouble, that is, the structural problems left over by the early planned economy must be slowly solved in the new period.

Civilization is the same, after the Chinese civilization is infiltrated by Western values, the way of life and values change, and the changes in the structure will affect all aspects of society, and there will be a lot of thunder, from the society to the family and the individual will evolve into many phenomena, no need to make a fuss, the reason is this, just have a bottom in your heart.

The reason why later generations want to promote this set of human rights-freedom and democracy is that the old industrial countries understand the cruelty of the industrial age and know how to water the flowers of big industry. The reason why we want to promote this set of human rights-freedom and democracy is, first, to create a full-circulation market, second, to unify the rules of competition, and third, to seize the right to speak in the field of civilization with a high degree of morality.

The industrial advantages accumulated by the old industrial powers, one is capital, the second is technology and high-quality industrial workers, the third is the scale cost advantage, the fourth is the market, the fifth is management, the sixth is the reputation, the seventh is the circulation links and channels, and the eighth is the right to speak in the world public opinion.

Even if a management not only refers to business managers and rules and regulations, there are a large number of business schools and middle, high and low technical colleges to provide support. The cases introduced by late-developing countries must all be business cases of old industrial countries, and the environment is not right in the implementation, and the water and soil adaptation must be adjusted, digested and absorbed.

Where do the teachers and teaching tools come from in the technical college? Where do you do an internship? Where does the upper echelons of the government need to have senior management and business talents? The private sector also needs to have industry associations and supporting industry laws and regulations, which will take a long time to run.

Take one of the branches of capital, finance, as an example, what is finance, industrial plus bank is called finance, and just playing with the bank without industry is not called modern finance. What capital is, it is not the general equivalent of money, but a tool that can obtain surplus value, which is always in a state of investment.

Winning 100 million lottery tickets after tax 70 million is money,Put it on the account and slowly consume or money,Only when you enter the investment link is called capital,And money is just a similar thing in the capital to issue banknote reserves,By no means all of the capital,Just a capital advantage,Developed countries can crush the late-developing countries to death.

Another example is the circulation link that seems to be not very important in the end, which is nothing in peacetime, but when the wind and grass are blowing, the circulation link cannot be circulated, and the industry will suffocate to death.

By seizing the world's sea power, the British Empire established a maritime hegemon, a maritime insurance hegemon, and scattered the bills to the financial city, and a financial reinsurance overlord came out again. Until later generations, the overlord of marine insurance was still the United Kingdom, and Britain was quite a gentleman in the process of losing world hegemony, and the United States was not embarrassed to rip off the last pair of pirate father's pants.

Just one circulation link will involve sea power, how do you let the late-developing countries chase the advantages of developed countries?

The gap that makes smart people desperate, only stupid and bold dare to chase things, want to use bricks and bricks to do imperialism, all those who can produce this kind of thinking are stupid and bold, smart people are either acting agents or throwing themselves into the arms of foreign guests, and they don't believe that they can catch up at all.

Fortunately, capitalism will inevitably suffer from the troubles of socialism, and the old industrial countries will degenerate like Spain, which received the silver of the Americas, which is the slackness of all empires and rich people who have nothing to do.

As a result of the labor game between the old industrial countries and their domestic countries, the human rights situation is improving, but the competitiveness is declining.

We cannot refuse the continuous improvement of the human rights situation, and we cannot allow the late-developing countries to catch up and sell to the whole world the results of this game that is only played at a later stage of their own development, that is, the best monopoly technology.

Late-developing countries want to catch up by suffering from the developed countries? Don't dream, you don't even have the qualifications to want to suffer.

Universal values, human rights, freedom, democracy, and the rise of lofty public opinion will directly bring the cost of competition to the same level as that of developed countries. It does not give you room for comparative advantage, forces you to be noble, and does not give you the opportunity to be a villain at all. Kindness, right? Thanksgiving, right?

But so benevolent, what about some countries in Africa that can only be zoos?

In addition to wild animals for people to see, receive hunting people, sell a few hunting licenses, and engage in some original ecological tourism, is there any other way?

The Amazon is the green lung of the earth, but you don't pay for oxygen when you breathe, and you don't let South Americans cut down trees and plant some food, kindness is merciful, but the locals can't just guard the rainforest and catch piranhas to eat.

Later generations have made the local environmental laws and employment contracts in Africa close to Britain and France, which is indeed in line with human rights, and there is nothing morally said, but... But there is really nothing to say, it is extremely correct to do so, human rights and environmental fighters continue to work hard, the world really needs such noble people, needs the gambling side, otherwise it will really become a miserable world.

What is Les Miserables like, what the early stage of the country's great industrialization looked like, the examples of the world's major countries spitting on each other in the literature are that anyway, there is no criticism of the original ecological safari tourism in the textbooks of various countries.

That is the real universal value, and there are people who oppose the universal thing, such as the glorious years of the beloved Mr. Mandela, who are praised by all countries and say that everyone is good, this is a great man.

What is Les Miserables like, that is, the terrifying world in which the country does not let go of its own people in order to develop and grow, each more ferocious than the other, is all typical of the villains in each other's textbooks.

How much better the world would be if these countries had leaders as loving as Nelson Mandela.

Nazi Germany, the Soviet Union, China, and Japan, in the early stage of industrial development, were all subsidized by employing agriculture, scissors, and poor shearing of farmers' wool.

Britain in the fifteenth century has been directly herding sheep and eating people, from the eighteenth century in the period of primary industrial construction, not only to the country, it sheared the whole world back and forth, where the wool flies, India was originally a geographical term, hard to allow it to shear sheep to unification.

It is the dry wool textile started, its dedication to shearing sheep has been deeply rooted in the bone marrow, the next land on the sheep, the next land is also sheep, Australia and New Zealand are all sheep, July also has a wool festival, even the United States betrayed out of the still remember to shear the sheep, too persistent, these two goods are not the overlord sheep do not agree, are used to shearing!

Sheep shearing dependence is really addictive, and it's hard to quit!

The world is so cruel that it is ruled by a gang of sheep herders.

Nazi Germany is better, its own technical foundation is solid, and its industrial products have a competitive advantage, and it counts the invoices of tens of millions of marks for a pound of potatoes, and quickly completes the armament, and then lets go of a group of old Junkers landlords in China, and goes out to find others to reimburse the invoices.

Japan's technology is almost there, dismantling people to scrap steel, reeling silk to help people provide raw materials for stockings, pouring some textile and daily chemical hardware, on this point of light industry profits do not squeeze domestic farmers how to increase the scale of heavy industry.

The countryside is in turmoil, and the peasants all over the country can't eat rice, so they get up and fight the murderous imperial army, so how desperate do you have to dare to fight with the samurai lord with bayonets?