In the Internet era, one of the biggest lies, a narcotic that makes people willing to fall and cannot turn over, is the sentence that no one knows whether there is a dog or a person sitting on the other side of the network.

This sentence, full of the spirit of freedom, inspires the spirit of venting and fabricates a lie that is not responsible. Because it tells the audience, it's okay to vent online, you don't have to be responsible for what you say, and no one knows who you are.

In fact, everyone knows who is on the other side of the network. People who think they don't have to be responsible are actually paying the price all the time.

Real-name reporting and anonymous posting, the former has the courage to take responsibility and dare to pay the price. The latter is obscene, and there is one rat. Could it be that the two have the same mental and personal strength? What kind of spirit do you want to nourish?

If you don't practice for one day, you know, if you don't practice for two days, the master knows, and if you don't practice for three days, the audience knows.

The foundation of a good learner is to know how to learn by himself. The foundation of a successful person is self-control.

True freedom is not about doing whatever you want, but about not doing what you want.

People who can practice only when they are urged to do so really have the opportunity to stand on the stage, facing the audience, don't ask where the applause is, first ask yourself if it is false?

When the little girl goes out to put on makeup, who else does she need to supervise? That's a kind of realization, it's enough to have a mirror that can't speak.

Which level speaks which level and does which level of things. What occasions to go in, consciously abide by the rules of what occasions.

People who are eager to move upwards and are eager to be respected cultivate self-control and a sense of responsibility. When they are not responsible for their words and actions, they have to be responsible for themselves.

How many times have you been to the party, and you think that people are playing the same as you? The same place does not necessarily pretend to be the same person.

If you want to grow up, the next time you go to a place like a nightclub, ask the lady next to you, and ask if there are some people who will only let the lady pour wine and accompany the wine, and never move their hands and feet. Ask who these people are, and ask Miss Man what she thinks.

Think that a nightclub wine is a cuddle? What is the difference between it and the old peasant who thinks that the emperor makes a golden hoe?

Entertaining? The joy is that there is only a young lady in the eyes of the sheep, and there is only a sheep in the eyes of the tiger wolf. When the sheep bleated, the wolf's skin could not be covered, and the seeds of killing were planted.

Self-control has nothing to do with whether or not there is supervision. There are occasions when you are not responsible, and there is no self that is not responsible. The text is the model of the world, the behavior is the rule, and the words and deeds are you. When words and deeds come out, you come out, you can't see yourself, but it doesn't mean that others can't see you.

If you don't take responsibility for yourself, it doesn't matter if you feel it, then it doesn't matter.

The answer to this question is the question of society, relationships, class, wealth and poverty, disparity, and who eats whom.

Most people have no obligation to this kind of person, because this kind of person will even scold the country and humanitarian charities that want to help him, and even the blood relatives and good people who help him will be harmed.

This kind of person dies unjustly, and what is even more wronged is a good person who has no good retribution.

Why is there such an understanding that there is such a thing as Shengmien and Mi Dou, why are so many good people hurt as well, why do they love each other and hurt each other?

Because there are too many good people who don't admit their mistakes. These good people don't know that they don't have certain qualities that can turn good things into bad ones.

I really told these defects to good people, and good people would say that in fact, I can know if I think about it, yes, how easy it is to remove bubbles from glass, just stirring, you can know if you think about it, you can understand it at a glance, why let people tell it.

The key is, on the road of growth, who will tell you, who will let you see, who will carry you, who will give you opportunities, who is your nobleman, do you know what the opportunity looks like? Catch it or not?

Once taken for granted, good people will do bad things with good intentions. It's not that good people don't get rewarded, it's that good people lack the ability to turn good results into good results.

On the road of a person's growth, there are very few mentors and friends he encounters, and the most are friends who drink and meat, passers-by and passers-by. If you can't look at people and can't distinguish, your cognition will be reversed, and you won't distinguish between good and bad.

Because people who want you to grow up will hurt you first.

For example, a painter, a painting, a group of viewers from different walks of life, a group of buyers, an auction.

The painting is abstract, so abstract that I don't know what it is, it's just geometric figures, some colors. However, some people paid tens of millions to buy.

Yang Wei was in the audience, and he couldn't read it, and he couldn't appreciate the ghost-like painting, but he just didn't say it. He doesn't understand, but that doesn't mean he will say it. He can't appreciate it, but that doesn't mean he thinks others can't appreciate it either.

He would despise anyone who offered a few hundred dollars for a can to win a ring, because it was in his knowledge. But he would never dare to laugh at the person who spends tens of millions of dollars to buy paintings, because this kind of behavior is beyond the scope of his cognition and overflows.

For the overflowing part, as soon as he laughed at it, it represented superficiality, and he committed a foul. Such behavior is bound to be despised by the same class. Even if most people around you can't understand it or appreciate it, it doesn't mean that everyone can't wear a mask.

Vanity Fair is a mask ball, wearing a mask is the admission rule, whoever takes off the mask is out.

In this mask ball, it is the part that shows off your strengths, and what you hide is the part that you are lacking. When you meet someone who shows superficial words and deeds in your area of strength, be reserved and don't need to interrupt, this is a green leaf. For areas you don't understand, bury a little, don't let yourself become a green leaf.

Some of the owners who took the knowledge of the market and went into Vanity Fair thought that they were unmasking others, thinking that the emperor's new clothes in the textbook were really like that, but they didn't look at why the people around them were all laughing and silent.

Vanity Fair is a madhouse, and the emperor's new clothes have another interpretation here: the emperor knows that he is light, but he just wants to see who can know that he is a light pig, and admires his new clothes for being beautiful.

Zhao Gao doesn't know what a deer is and what a horse is? In the same way, the deer is referred to as a horse, and the friend who thinks it is a deer asks the temple to step forward. Who takes this step has nothing to do with the red deer. Those who are qualified to stand in the temple have no red deer in their eyes.

The person who sees the emperor's new clothes and the person who sees the red deer in the hall has different angles and judgments from different angles and judgments than those who read the story from fairy tales or historical materials. The conclusions in the book are always the right answers, and they are right. But those who could really survive back then were all filled in with wrong answers, which was wrong.

The first logical deduction about right and wrong is out, this is an easy deduction to solve, and if you unravel this, your understanding of right and wrong will go further.

The new clothes and the red deer are appearances, and it is pointless to argue about the authenticity of appearances.

In a madhouse, whoever is sober is a madman, who is really smart and pretends to be crazy, and will never show his sobriety, that is to take medicine.

Vanity Fair is not a market, it is not a shrew quarrel, it will not think that it is an independent special thing for big pants to go in and out of high-end occasions, and it will not think that slapping the face is high-end, it is either good or good, and bad is bad. Good or bad is a subjective imagination and does not necessarily lead to good and bad outcomes.

If Yang Wei is kind enough to tell the painter, your painting is too abstract, I can't understand it. Can you do this, this, and this, add this, subtract that?

Once Yang Wei does such a good thing with such a good intention, what will be the consequences?

The consequences are cruel, they will expose their weaknesses completely, and they will become a light bulb on the field, which is extremely gorgeous. The people around you will first know you, then get to know you again, and then, stay away from you.

Didn't the painter know that Yang Wei was kind? The painter is not afraid of Yang Wei's scolding, but he is afraid of such a kind person. Limited to cognition, trapped in limitations, such a well-wisher will think that he has been doing good deeds.

Every time he does a good deed, such a good person will be lowered a notch in the eyes of others, and will become more and more annoying and alienating.

Some "I'm here for your good" parents and relatives are like this, and most of them are really well-intentioned. But trapped in knowledge, too many limitations, every day in the family of short people, can't control their instincts, don't know that they have been doing boring good things.

How can such a good person, such a Shengmi en, fight Mi Hatred, not get hurt?

Good people are not injured because good people are not rewarded, but because good people also have limitations, lack the methodology to guide correct behavior, cannot control the boundaries of behavior, and cannot turn good intentions into good results.

The painter knows that if a good person does such a good thing, he will lower the level of the good person. The painter hopes that the person who has a good heart for him can be rewarded, but should he tell the truth to such a good person?

If you tell the truth, you will hurt people. Hypocritical admiration, on the contrary, makes people happy.

The painter hopes that the good people who release kindness to him will grow, but the truth that promotes the growth of good people will hurt the good people.

The second logic is deducted, for the painter, what should he do in the face of such a good person?

Good people are speaking with their own cognition in good faith, but it will lead to the result of hurting others, hurting themselves and hurting relationships.

In order for a good person to grow up who is kind to him, the painter must make the good person understand the meaning of the boundary of behavior in the relationship. But this kind of thing to tell a good person is something that the painter knows not to say. As soon as you say it, it will cause good people to get hurt, lead to hurt others, hurt yourself, and hurt the relationship.

Good people do bad things with good intentions, and painters do bad things with good intentions. A good person appreciates a painter and only hopes that the other party will be better, and the painter regards a good person as a friend and hopes that the other party will be better. They love each other, but they hurt each other. True love can't be exchanged for true love, but fake love and false intentions can be in tune, this is the word love in the world, why is it so complicated.

This logic buckle is difficult to solve, and most people are trapped in this logic buckle all their lives, and love and hate each other with family members, relatives, relatives and friends, or get together or leave.

This logic buckle is also very easy to solve, do things with your heart, do not ask for everything to go well, but ask for worthy of my heart. If you can't get along with each other, why not forget about each other?

There is no feast in the world that will not be dispersed, and if people do not fit together, they will only drift apart. Cherish the time together, and wish each other a smooth journey when parting, it is enough to live up to the acquaintance.

The gentleman broke off his friendship and did not speak ill of him. The differences in front of each other can't erase the friendship that they once knew and intersected with, and slandering their former friends is denying their former selves.

The heart is calm, why be afraid of enmity?

(Chapter 5 should be blocked because of this logic button, which is the practical significance of this logic button.) I am the one who lacks the ability to turn good intentions into good results, lacks ability, has limited cognition, and is self-righteous. If you hurt others, you can also hurt yourself. At present, self-inspection and self-inspection, but due to the reason that the light is dark, the specific problem is estimated to be solved after contacting the starting point responsible editor, and strive to release it. I will adjust the scale according to the specific requirements and constrain the behavioral margins. It was my mistake and hopefully it will lead to growth. Sincerely! )