Although the number (9) classmate (hey, I gave you a nickname, don't be angry) said that no one reads the work, but I still write it privately:

In chapter 10, the English excerpt that Seamus said is from the modern English version of the Bible, and the meaning has been translated for everyone, in fact, this sentence is also written privately for himself and someone, if you want to see the content after the dividing line.

As for why Seamus, who is a magician, knows the contents of the Bible of the Church of the Dead Enemy, it can only be said that every Qiē is Professor Verne's pot. As you can already see, Professor Verne is one of the key figures in this book, and he will appear soon.

In fact, private is digging a hole now, and private has a small ambition to make "Professor Mowen" (this book was originally serialized in the www.biquge.info of Biqu Pavilion, based on some of his own speculations, but for some reason it was lost. Some of the foreshadowing in the series, but because it will add some private things, it can't be called a continuation.

If the writing is not good, please bear with the old readers who have read the book, after all, the private writing is limited, and it is not as big as the string rhyme, and some of the so-called plots and foreshadowing are just private personal speculations, and there will definitely be deviations from the string rhyme himself. And with some things of selfishness, it will definitely be even more biased.

What private is doing now is trying to see if his brain hole can be in harmony with the chords, such as the "Pandora's sigh" of the professor zuò, and private has always had a guess. In addition, for Professor Verne in the original book, who has been single for many years, Miss Ona is waiting with her eyes open, and this kind of plot is very unhappy.

If there is a bad private change, I hope to get everyone's understanding and forgiveness.

Of course, I hope that String Rhyme will be able to see the book written by String Rhyme, and if some things are guessed correctly, such as Atlantis and the "Pandora's Sigh", I hope to make String Rhyme smile.

If you accidentally guess wrong, I hope that the string rhyme will come out and point it out, because at that time, the private meeting will tell you: "It's been three years!! Come back soon for updates!! ”

Private may not be a persistent author (sell cute: eh, hey), but he must be a persistent reader.

—————— the dividing line of the mood——————

Now that the happy things are out of the way, let's talk about some unhappy things:

First of all, I want to say to the number (9) that this paragraph is for other people, not for you. For the number (9) classmates, private is really grateful to you, you have given private very valuable advice.

However, those other people made the private very angry, although they said similar things to the number (9) classmates, but one was unreasonable and provocative to find trouble, and the other was reasonable and gave private help. So please let the private vent here.

Some people say that the protagonist's words and deeds are like a traverser, but his identity is not a traverser, and he doesn't want to see it, and he is very confused about it, like the Pythagorean sect, these things are not only now, they have been thousands of years. As for dialectics, isn't it the only dialectic in the world that we taught in middle school?

Foreign dialectics was produced in the 6th century B.C., and the collection was completed in the 18th century to the early 19th century A.D., and the dialectics we know are in the middle of the 19th century.

And is it strange that foreigners in the 90s talked about dialectics and knew about atomism? Atomism was common knowledge at the time, right?

As for games, RPGs, were there no games in the 90s? Brother sues sù privately, "Command and Conquer" is 95 years (well, a bug was found here, the game is a year later than the plot, and it was privately recognized), "Diablo 1" is 96 years, as for some games in the 11th district, private will not be an example (brother or something's go.die), in short, was there no computer game before? Can't children in the wizarding world play?

In the setting of the magical mother, Seamus herself is a half-blood, her father is a Muggle, and her mother is a wizard, and being born in such a family must have taken care of both worlds. Harry's cousin Dudley can play games, and Harry has also secretly played while the Desleys are away, so why can't Seamus play it? Why can't he know some of the common knowledge of the Muggle world and some of the knowledge of the game nerd?

Then use some lines from the game, such as the Great Demon King, why can't you summon a princess or a saint from another world? There was no such story in the RPGs of the 90s? I really can't figure it out.

Such words and deeds will attract scolding? In addition, it seems that he has never said that Seamus is a traverser or not, right? If you want to watch the traverser, you can change the previous chapters now, but you are not going to change it, because this private section has a plot arrangement, a very special plot.

First of all, I would like to remind you that although Professor Verne is a traverser, the professor is not the direct cause of some strange words and deeds of the guide. (This was originally one of the private foreshadowings, used to confuse everyone, but now it can be clearly told to everyone, no!) Save someone from scolding the simple, shallow, and routine of private writing. ）

As for the author's self-hilarity or something, there are two understandings of the word self-hilarity, one is to say that writing a book privately is just self-satisfaction; The second is to say that the words written in the work and at the end of the article are just a private person's self-talk, a person's self-entertainment.

To this, the private reply is: (1) If the book written privately cannot even be written happily by the private herself, how can the reader who reads it be happy? (2) Writing a book is inherently the author confiding in the reader, using the story, the plot, and the characters to confide. And outside of the story, can't private tell some of his thoughts directly to the reader in a more straightforward way? Can't private interact with private readers?

Private can only say that if a person deliberately provokes, the private book must be full of loopholes, because private is not a god, not everyone, and the writing is so-so. But this is also the reason why I want to communicate with readers, and I hope that readers who like books can help me find out about the problems that I can't find alone.

In the past few days, many readers have raised very meaningful questions, listened privately, and spent time revising the previous chapters, which I believe you can also see. To these readers, thank you very much. If you just feel that there is a problem with the protagonist's words, you can explain and modify it privately, and if you don't write it well or have a bug, you can apologize privately.

But if someone else says, "It's not that you don't read it, please make the author laugh at yourself", private can only say that it is your freedom, but whether to write or not is a private right.

Because in addition to you, there are people who want to see it, and they will not choose to watch or not to watch it for the identity of the protagonist or not, but what they want to offer them is a story that can move people's hearts or smile.

Finally, I still welcome everyone to give comments to this book and pick bugs. But if it's the kind of person who doesn't want to watch at all, he just wants to scold and sarcastically.

Sorry, this is not a public toilet, please stay away.