Interpersonal responsibility for the development of society

Interpersonal responsibility is a major academic research topic, and his natural, social, and species competitiveness ability, survival ability, and the direction of species evolution are all very important choices, and pain empathy is a kind of epigenetic characteristic embodied in interpersonal communication. www.biquge.infoPain empathy is defined as the perception, experience, and emotional response to the pain of others, that is, empathy for the pain of others. It can also be said that in the face of a certain thing or situation, a common feeling, a mental and spiritual reaction, a different feeling of the degree of understanding of pain, because pain empathy can empathize with the other person and understand. Therefore, the survival and development of the individual can be more integrated with the individual and the society, so it has a positive role in the process of communication and communication between people: in the structure of single cell and multicellular, man is a cell combination species. In neurons, the amygdala receives a signal in response to the process and responds in a timely manner. Pain is only part of the story. However, pain is divided into physical pain and psychological pain. With the feeling of pain, it can be said that it is not a numbness or a feeling of the characteristics of the organism. The so-called empathy is to look at that aspect. On the one hand, seeing the pain of others can prompt the existence of danger to the individual and make the individual react to avoid danger, so as to protect themselves from harm. On the other hand, the perception of the pain of others can make the individual perceive and understand the pain of others, promote the altruistic behavior of the individual, and then enhance the prosocial behavior of the individual and develop good interpersonal relationships. It is difficult to achieve perfection in the relationship between people, because each person's level of understanding and awareness is different, so the reflection of many things is also very different. And empathy should first be understood as a common, roughly the same feeling, so that we can understand the feelings of others. That is, to change positions and empathize. Immerse yourself in the other person's position and think about the next question. The other aspect of empathy is that they react naturally and feel the same way about each other. In this way, you can quickly understand the other person's psychological and behavioral reactions. So, this is empathy. Empathy can be divided into several explanations, 1. Common emotion, the common feeling, imagination, and fantasy that arises in a certain situation. 2. Common behavior, the reaction that occurs in a specific situation, that is, the action and behavior characteristics. i.e. the same finger raising. However, the research on the relationship between personality factors and pain empathy needs to be explored.

Interpersonal self-reliance is a comprehensive personality factor formed by individuals in solving the interpersonal problems they encounter, and it is an important part of self-reliance personality. Interpersonal self-reliance includes five qualities, namely: interpersonal independence, interpersonal initiative, interpersonal responsibility, interpersonal flexibility, and interpersonal openness.

Interpersonal responsibility may be associated with pain empathy for the reason that interpersonal responsibility is associated with agreeability in the Big Five in terms of the relationship between interpersonal self-reliance and the Big Five. On the other hand, from the perspective of trait characteristics, people with low interpersonal responsibility show emotional indifference or indifference to others, so people with low interpersonal responsibility may mainly show indifference, and emotional arousal is an important condition for empathy, and when faced with the harm caused by their own responsibility, people with low interpersonal responsibility tend to avoid taking responsibility to reduce their own guilt and guilt, which suggests that interpersonal responsibility may be positively correlated with pain empathy. Of course, we can't deny it, and there can be a negative correlation as well. That is, in the case of interpersonal responsibility, empathy with pain, and doing the opposite thing under the premise of rationality and irrationality.

Pain empathy is defined as the perception, experience, and emotional response to the pain of others, that is, the "empathy" of others' pain, pain empathy can be seen everywhere in life, for example, seeing others hurt, even if they are not hurt, they will feel the pain of others, and they will feel sad when they see others' misfortune, this is empathy. Pain empathy has a positive effect on the survival and development of individuals and interpersonal communication, and can prompt others of the existence of danger before seeing others' injuries, pain or danger coming, so that individuals can respond to avoid danger and save themselves from harm. Avoid unfortunate things from happening. On the premise of understanding the pain of others, it can enhance the prosocial behavior of individuals and promote the healthy development of society. Good interpersonal relationshipsIn the 60s of the last century, researchers discovered the existence of animal pain empathy in the study of altruistic behavior of rhesus monkeys, and then the research on human pain empathy gradually expanded. Compared with animal pain empathy, human pain empathy is more complex, because there are still more brain cells in the human brain. The development of the brain essence is also relatively complex and perfect. Under the influence of many factors, in the future world, with the development of human cognitive ability, the development of human brain will be more refined. For example, the factors of the pain sufferer and the observer and the relationship between the two will interfere with the process of recognition and understanding of pain signals, thereby affecting the individual differences of the observer's pain empathy for others, such as gender, age, region, background, knowledge, family situation, environmental factors, physiological and psychological quality, etc. Personality traits and the way they perceive pain signals can affect their interpretation and understanding of pain signals, which in turn affects the observer's level of pain empathy.

Among the personality factors influencing pain empathy, trait empathy and trait depression are the most studied. Individuals with high trait empathy had a higher tendency to empathize with pain than those with low trait empathy, and there were significant differences in the level of activation in some brain regions. High-trait empathy individuals tend to overestimate low-level pain, believing that they are in agreement with each other, and are able to understand each other and share the same perspective. Studies related to trait depression found that when watching video clips of other people's pain, the activation level of the sensorimotor cortex was significantly negatively correlated with trait depression scores, which may be because negative emotions such as depression inhibit the individual's sympathy for others, which is also related to some emotional elements in the whole brain structure. Of course, there are different judgments for different people. It is also related to the different needs of individuals. Good for oneself or not, harmful or harmless. At the same time, after making a judgment with everyone, some people consider the pros and cons of the result, and some people are really reckless. Of course, this is the next step after the first reaction of the brain's neurogen. Thereafter, through brain thinking processing, I make a result that I think is right. However, part of the consensus and empathy have a lot in common. Of course, it is also possible to make the opposite of empathy, which is also the reaction of a higher level of thinking processing when empathy is reached. That is, they should be sympathetic but not sympathetic, and they should be helpful but not helpful. Or in another way, instead of directly making the instinctive corresponding results, the results are processed in a more perfect way.

Interpersonal self-reliance is a comprehensive personality factor formed by individuals in solving the interpersonal problems they encounter, and it is an important part of self-reliance personality. Interpersonal self-reliance includes five qualities, namely: interpersonal independence, interpersonal initiative, interpersonal responsibility, interpersonal flexibility, and interpersonal openness. Interpersonal independence is the ability to engage in basic interpersonal activities on one's own; Interpersonal initiative is to take the initiative to interact with others; Interpersonal responsibility is to be loyal and trustworthy to others; Interpersonal flexibility means not rigidly adhering to the principles and methods of interpersonal communication, and being able to deal with interpersonal problems in a contingency, realistically, so as to safeguard the needs, interests and face of all parties involved; Interpersonal openness is about being active and accommodating others. These are the basic characteristics of a person's independence.

The reasons are: 1. From the perspective of the relationship between interpersonal self-reliance and the Big Five, interpersonal responsibility is similar to the agreeability in the Big Five. 2. From the point of view of the characteristics of the traits, people with low interpersonal responsibility show emotional indifference or indifference to others, or a careless attitude, so people with low interpersonal responsibility may mainly show indifference, and the external manifestation of this negative emotion is not prominent as emotionless. Emotional arousal is an important condition for empathy, suggesting that there may be an effect on empathy, that is, people with low interpersonal responsibility are likely to have low empathy for others, both experiential and cognitive. Conversely, people with high interpersonal responsibility are more likely to exhibit similar traits to trait empathy individuals: overestimation of others' pain levels, leading to "inflated" pain empathy levels. Individuals with high interpersonal responsibility will still show pain empathy for others, while those with low interpersonal responsibility will show low or no empathy. 3. Moreover, when faced with the harm caused by their own responsibility, people with low interpersonal responsibility tend to avoid taking responsibility to reduce their own guilt and guilt, while people with high interpersonal responsibility are the opposite, suggesting that interpersonal responsibility may be positively correlated with pain empathy. Of course, it should not be ignored that the results are related to the actual economic life, living environment, and growth experience of each person. Is it sympathy, help, or indifference, neglect, or indifference. The psychological factor of the relationship is very important.