Seeing the message of the reader [Shang Song] [Peerless Mandate of Heaven], I looked back at the first few chapters of "Terminator 2", and the mutual use of the protagonist and the governor was indeed written poorly by me, but-

There is no way.

I wrote Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II when I was writing about the main character learning the London dialect and the queen accent, and as a result, the word was blocked, and I had no choice but to change it back to Elizabeth.

Then, starting from chapter 52, I began to write about Schwarzenegger, but I found that White House and Nazis (I haven't changed this word, it is an asterisk if you turn it forward), are also blocked words, so I can't explain to you in detail, why Schwarzenegger is close to Roland, and why Roland calculates the other party, because Schwarzenegger is a descendant of the Germanic people, and the relationship between the Germans and Nazis should be known as long as you have studied junior high school history. After he married Kennedy's niece, the first thing he did was to dispel the hostility of the guys in the White House to the Germans, so he did a lot of things to please the Jews with the help of Kennedy's niece, but I can't write about these, there are too many things involved, and it is either an asterisk or a large piece of English.

So I can only make a brief note at the end of chapter fifty-two, and then when I write chapter fifty-three, I will write directly about the win-win situation of David and Schwarzenegger - no way, in the case that president is a blocked word, everything I write is wrong, if I write it to Kennedy, this book will have to be the same as the situation encountered when I wrote Monroe in the previous book, it is obviously sexy that can be written by major media, and it can't be used when it comes to the starting point.

This reader said that the protagonist thinks too much.

In fact, my outline is that Schwarzenegger thinks too much first, and then Roland thinks about using the other party to hype himself.

But I can't write it.

I can't write about how Spielberg's father, a World War II veteran, hated Germans and why he collected information about the Holocaust.

I can't write about how much risk Roland would have to take if he helped Schwarzenegger and the Jews get on the line, because this one would have to write about World War II and Fascist, and once these things were written, they would definitely be blocked.

So I chose to simplify the plot that should have about four chapters.

It's a pity that after dealing with it, it will become a Roland thief ** stupid, and he has been calculating this, calculating that......

Of course, as an author, I shouldn't have complained about these things.

But when I was coding words today, I found that if I didn't explain it, as soon as the follow-up plot was written, it would be troublesome again.

"You're an idiot, aren't you? What is this protagonist worried about? ”

Of course, I'm worried about being blocked......

The plot of Roland being used by Schwarzenegger can't be written, so of course I can't reflect why he cowered in front of Schwarzenegger, he didn't cower at Schwarzenegger, but he cowered at 'fear of losing Spielberg's unenjoyed backer', and he cowered at 'afraid that Spielberg and Schwarzenegger would get angry after they met'.

That's why he wants to get on the line with Schwarzenegger at the same time, and find a way to get some benefits from the other party, so as not to gain nothing in case he loses Spielberg's backer.

I know my explanation hurts, and I'm wondering how I'm going to skip it for the rest of the story.

Because after I wrote it, I found out that it was supposed to be a plot where both sides calculated each other, but in front of the river crab beast, it became stupid, what kind of shrewdness of the traverser, what memories of the previous life, these things are there, but they can't be written.

At the time of typing this paragraph, today's article is 2,000 words.

Because I found that if I didn't write these things, I didn't know how to write them myself.

I read book reviews every day, and I laughed myself when someone asked if there were very few readers for this book.

I've done everything I can do with my own number to reward myself.

When I was making an outline, some colleagues advised me, don't write realistically, with your understanding of Hollywood, there is no problem at all in following the trend to write a Hollywood anti-routine essay, isn't it unpleasant to be realistic?

That's right......

I just seem to be trying to make myself unhappy.

But—

Even if I cringe and write a lot of nonsense, I still want to write.

To put it mildly, this book is different from the previous one, and it has nothing to do with dreams.

I mainly think that if I don't write about hardcore Hollywood, then all these years, the IMDb Pro annual membership and ladder money of 150 dollars a year will be in vain.

The more than 2,000 movies I've watched have to at least glow and heat up.

Okay, don't be verbose, no matter how verbose the word count is, you have to catch up with the text.

I'd like to think about how to change the next chapter.

Grunted today.