Hey, why did I go to lecture "Strength Supremacy Classroom" again? Because it's fun!

Chapter 2: It turns out that Kiyotaka Ayakoji tells the story of equality

"Real Teaching" caused a lot of discussion after the animation was broadcast, but today we are not talking about animation but novels, because the animation has deleted a lot of details, and the plot advances too quickly, resulting in a lot of content looking stupid.

If you don't have a good memory, you'll probably forget what it started with after you finish watching the anime or novel.

——————————————————————

It's sudden, but I would like to ask you to listen to my question and try to think about the answer.

Is all people equal?

In today's real society, there is a constant cry for "equality, equality".

There are often calls for reciprocity between the sexes, and there is a desperate effort to eliminate the differences.

"Let's increase the employment rate of women" and "Let's set up women-only cars" – sometimes even the order of the roster is finicky.

Since there should be no discrimination, public opinion has advocated a change in the wording of the word "disability" to "persons with disabilities". Today's children are also indoctrinated with the idea that everyone is equal.

Is this really true? - I have such doubts.

——————————————————————

The beginnings of "Shijiao" and "Spring Things" are completely different, "Shijiao" is to understand the world from the perspective of an excellent student, and "Spring Things" is to complain about the world from the perspective of an autistic person.

How to say it, as an aside, Aya Xiaolu was basically complete at the beginning, and Biqigu is still developing.

However, although "Real Teaching" is higher, it is far less shocking than "Instant Charge", so it is difficult to remain in our memory.

But for people like us, "Shijiao" is definitely a treasure, because it is not as obscure and subtle as "Spring Things", so it gives people a lot of room to play, "How many up masters have been fed by a drama", which is probably what it means.

Glancing back at the original text, we say, "There are often calls for parity between the sexes, and there is a desperate attempt to eliminate the differences. ”

Look, the slot is coming all of a sudden, so let's talk about the topic of "women's rights" today:

Do you think I'm going to start writing a serious essay of tens of thousands of words? No, no, no, it's so boring, no one watches. Let's start with something a little fun, that is, "Domineering President Wen".

Accident, misunderstanding, just because I took one more look in the crowd, so I fell in love with you. This person, I raised.

Accident, misunderstanding, just because I took one more look at the dogs, so I bought you. This dog, I raised.

See what I mean? I feel that the domineering president is not in love, but in keeping pets. As long as the heroine can eat, drink, and Lazar, and then be coquettish and cute, what's the difference between it and a dog?

I think that's an insult to women.

What is hypocritical feminism?

"I want to be a dog, I have the right to be a dog, so I can be a dog. If you stop me and ask me to be a human being, you are violating my rights. ”

What is real feminism?

"I want to be a human being, I have the right to be a human being, all I can be a human being. If you stop me and ask me to be a dog, you're violating my rights. ”

Fake feminists are actually just lazy, what rights do they want? The right to be lazy.

By the way, laziness and rest are different, the essence of rest is for better work, and the essence of laziness is refusal to work.

The core goal of the domineering president is to deprive the heroine of the ability and right to work, so that she can rely on herself, just like an addict and a drug are inseparable.

And this is the biggest violation of women.

What is "it is better to give a fish than to give a fish"? That is to give her money, this is not women's rights, give her the opportunity to learn, this is women's rights.

A thousand words are combined into one sentence: white prostitution is not good.

After that, I actually wrote a bunch of mess, but I quickly deleted it. Why? Because it's not necessary, in fact, everyone understands such a simple truth, or everyone understands it, and those who don't understand it can't say they can't understand it. After all, this is not a paper, and many things need not be said so clearly, but it is boring to say it carefully.

Don't worry about the domineering president Wen, after all, it's Shuangwen, I'm just using it as an example, and I don't plan to attack it.

Because of the different fields, Shuangwen has always been something that cannot be evaluated by common sense, and the core of Shuangwen is originally used to release inner desires, which is similar to small yellow films, so there is no need to be harsh. If you say that there shouldn't be a cool article in the world, then it's as ridiculous as saying that there shouldn't be a V in the world.

Okay, I'll come back and continue to look at the content behind "Shijiao", which probably means that equality is wrong, that is, human beings are inherently unequal, and the reason for inequality lies in whether or not there is a bitter smile to study knowledge, quoting Han Yu's "Shi Shuo" (yes, the influence of Chinese classical Chinese on Japan is indeed quite far-reaching).

And then to say that even inequality does not follow instinct, and although the words of equality are lies, inequality is also a difficult fact to accept. And now I'm trying to find new answers to the eternal problem for humanity.

It's uncomfortable to watch.,I don't understand it.,Me too.,I feel like the author wrote a mess.。

The biggest question is whether this inequality is congenital or acquired, of course, both, innate resources and acquired learning are the causes of inequality, but the author's writing is very unclear, and the final "new answer to the eternal problem for mankind" is really confusing.

In the words of Hikiya Hachiman, it is: "This is an immature article, and after listening to it myself, I realized that the writing still needs to be pondered." I feel like an anonymous writer who has been seen through speculative ideas, thinking that if I use a few difficult words, I will appear smarter."

Then, without warning, the author immediately turned his pen:

"Hey, you who are reading this book in your hand right now.

"Have you thought seriously about the future?

"Have you ever thought about what it means to go to high school or college?

"Have you ever thought that although you are still ignorant now, you should start working unconsciously in the future?"

Okay, okay, let's see what happens next.