Temple of Stone. Pen, fun, pavilion www. biquge。 info

In the human world, any dilemma is, in a sense, a lack of humanity......

Just like the choice that a so-called terminal illness makes people face, this in itself is a choice that cannot be chosen......

No matter what choice is made, in fact, in the face of such a multiple-choice question, the end result will be hopeless......

And in a reasonable humane order, this choice itself should not arise!

Terminal illness will occur in any era, and it is almost impossible to completely overcome, although the level of medicine will continue to improve, but in the same way, new diseases will appear in front of doctors all the time, among these diseases, there will always be some diseases that are completely unsolvable by medical means at this stage......

In the face of these diseases, it often means unbearable suffering, whether it is for the patient or for the patient's family......

And it is very inhumane and does not conform to the laws of humanity to let terminally ill patients bear such pain on their own and make painful, difficult and desperate choices on their own......

From the perspective of the social security system, if the society develops to a certain height, there will inevitably be a certain amount of social security for terminal illnesses, such as fully bearing the medical expenses of patients, such as providing completely free treatment services, and even if social security has not developed to such a height, then the relevant legal provisions on euthanasia should be adopted, because for terminally ill patients, if there is no economic assistance provided by the state, then a decent and painless death, I am afraid that it is already the best outcome, and it is an approach that will neither drag down one's family and friends, nor let oneself suffer from it......

And this practice, in a sense, in such a situation, can actually be said to be a truly humane behavior......

The term humanitarianism is actually widely circulated......

But what is humanity in the true sense of the word?

I'm afraid that few people can explain it clearly......

The vast majority of people are ignorant of the concept of humanity......

They can tell whether something is humane or not, but it is often difficult to understand in the true sense what kind of order is really humane order and what is the ultimate goal of humane order.

If you have to explain the concept of humanity, it's not complicated!

――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――

The so-called humanity is to never make people really despair, no matter how much pain, no matter how much loss, it can always leave people with a glimmer of life, and can always leave people with a theoretically best choice!

The essence of humanity is the right to always be free to choose!

The essence of humanity is that people will never be torn between a dilemma or a choice!

The essence of humanity is that it will always prompt people to make choices that are beneficial to themselves and others, not a dilemma!

For many countries or people to allow the law to allow an innocent person to use medical means to achieve death, it is actually very difficult for many countries or people to accept, because the act of killing a person itself is actually a taboo for human beings......

This kind of practice is actually contrary to human civilization, so even if this practice is indeed the best choice some people can make in a sense, the vast majority of countries still do not agree with such a law......

However, there is only one reason why countries that agree with this kind of law!

That's humanity!

Because it's a humane act!

Whether humane or inhumane is often not judged by the result, and many times to determine whether an act is humane or not, in essence, still depends on the process......

It's like a person dies, if it's the death of the end of life, then it is in line with the laws of humanity, even if such a person dies, the family will not feel too sad, because the person who dies is actually not too much regret in his heart, at least in the eyes of others, the person who can die is the object of envy......

On the other hand, if a person dies of murder or even torture, then this kind of behavior is inhumane, it is an artificial way to interfere with the survival of another person, and this kind of behavior must be traced to the end, even if the person who was killed is already terminally ill or has not had much time, this kind of behavior is absolutely not allowed!

In many cases, saving people is not necessarily a humane act, and killing people is not necessarily cruel......

For some people who are worse than dead, saving such people is inhumane in itself, and conversely, for some people who are worse than dead, killing such people may be a humane act......

――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――

Whether it is killing or saving, in essence, it is all part of humanity!

But humanity is not about the result in the sense of the word, but about the process!

If it is a doomed death, then it can be said that it is a humane act to reduce or even avoid suffering in the process of death......

On the contrary, it is also a doomed death, if the process of death is full of pain, then this kind of death cannot be regarded as humane, and will be rejected by the vast majority of people!

It's like a lot of people in this world can accept eating dog meat, but if someone abuses and kills cats and dogs, they will also feel righteous indignation!

Human eating meat is not a manifestation of the law of nature and a part of the way of heaven, so nature does not make people feel guilty, but heavenly reason is one part, and human desire is another......

The most fundamental reason why the strong are disgusted by the weak is that it is a serious violation of humanitarianism, that is, because of this, people do not feel guilty about eating meat, but they will have an instinctive disgust for the kind of behavior that obviously does not need to eat meat, but cruelly abuses and even kills other lives!

If hunting is for food, then hunting is a reasonable survival behavior, whereas if hunting is for pleasure, then the hunting itself is unnecessary and will be disgusted by people......

And the same is true for acts such as animal cruelty and killing......

Killing animals for food is not a big deal in itself, because it is a law of nature, but it is a very inhumane act to torture animals under the premise that they do not need to eat them and simply want to get sensory impact!

For the human group, this kind of behavior itself is not considered a criminal act, but this kind of behavior itself violates the taboo of the entire human group, because the vast majority of people are humane, and they will naturally have a heartfelt disgust for inhumane behavior!

In fact, even in scientific research institutions, when using a variety of animals used for scientific research experiments, they will try their best not to let these animals suffer too much, although sometimes drug experiments will definitely kill these animals, but scientific research institutions will never let these animals die in pain, but will choose to end their lives in a simple and direct way, so that they do not suffer too much......

Even so, these scientific research institutions are often questioned and criticized by humanitarian organizations, and feel that some biological research itself is inhumane......

In the same way, such as the incident of mistreatment of prisoners, why the impact is huge, this is the reason!

In the army, it is not a big deal for soldiers to abuse prisoners, and many frenzied armies are just waiting for large-scale pit killing of prisoners......

In many cases, acts that are inhumane are not entirely inexcusable......

Especially in ancient wars, a large number of prisoners themselves will consume a lot of food, the existence of prisoners itself is a natural threat to the army, if there is no more large number of troops to suppress, any famous general will not be able to suppress the number of prisoners more than a certain base, because that kind of behavior is equivalent to growing a huge cancer in their own army......

Because of this, some acts of killing prisoners, although inhumane, are not condemned too much......

In the modern world, however, the situation is completely different!

In modern society, the number of prisoners in war is often relatively small, and there is no problem of management and food shortage, so when facing such prisoners, maintaining the most recent humanitarianism is the most basic requirement for any country......

At least for the vast majority of ordinary people, they cannot accept this kind of abuse against human beings......

――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――

However, the army is different, and the soldiers in the army have a completely different way of thinking about many issues from ordinary people!

Especially the soldiers who fight on the battlefield, they actually have a very indifferent view of the so-called humanitarianism......

To put it simply, the existence of a soldier is itself an inhumane product!

Especially the soldiers on the battlefield!

The so-called love of soldiers is like a son, and the use of soldiers is like mud, this is the truth!

In peacetime, the general treats the soldiers like his own sons, but once on the battlefield, these soldiers are just one number after another, and their existence is only to achieve strategic goals......

For them, whether it is to kill the enemy, or the comrades around them are killed, or even to be killed themselves, it is actually not a big deal, they have long been accustomed to the feeling of death coming at any time!

Their feelings, their concepts, and their perception of humanity have long been very different from ordinary people, which is why the army always frequently breaks out some scandals that are unimaginable to ordinary people, but for the army, it has not caused any impact!

Of course, all humanity, in essence, is also built on the basis of order, and the existence of the army is often the basis for the establishment of order......

The military of any country is worthy of praise, because for the sake of the establishment of humanity, they pay precisely their own erasure of humanity......

The so-called soldiers do not tire of deception is not a simple empty phrase......

The so-called soldiers are not tired of deceit, and it is not simply strategy or cleverness......

The so-called soldiers do not tire of deceit, and it is a real act of unrestricted warfare that has no bottom line at all!

In war, people can abandon the bottom line, because compared with the personal bottom line and principles compared to the success or failure of the war, it can be said to be a negligible thing, and many soldiers actually have a bottom line before becoming a soldier......

But when they really need to defend their home and country, they are willing to give up any of their bottom lines, just to be able to protect their country!

Even many generals have been condemned and even ruined because of their defense of the country and done a lot of things that will seem inhumane to future generations, but they will never regret their choice from beginning to end, because they understand that only the strong are qualified to talk about humanitarianism, and the weak are not qualified to talk about the so-called humanity with the strong......

The difference between the military and ordinary people can be seen from the way soldiers are trained......

In the army, before the training is completed, almost no instructors will treat soldiers as a person, in the eyes of instructors, each soldier is just a number, a code, a set of data, but only not a flesh and blood person! (To be continued.) )