Temple of Stone. Pen × fun × Pavilion www. ｂｉｑｕｇｅ。 ｉｎｆｏ

In fact, in a sense, moral concepts also need to be guided......

In fact, in a sense, the correct guidance of people's moral concepts is also the most important link in the establishment of a humanitarian order......

The vast majority of people in this world actually belong to the group of good and orderly, but because of this, he cannot raise his moral standards too high......

The higher the standard of morality, the easier it is to make the social order chaotic, and the easier it is to confuse the laws of humanity......

The truth is not responsible!

No matter what kind of person they are, they must be egoists in essence, and the difference is that the degree of egoism is different......

Even if those good people do good deeds without seeking fame and fortune, in fact, they will also reap the satisfaction in their hearts, for them, this inner satisfaction is actually the driving force that prompts them to do good deeds, and this kind of behavior is actually a kind of egoism!

And the contradiction of human beings is precisely reflected here......

Human nature itself has two attributes: beneficial and self-interested......

Egoism is a kind of human nature, and the so-called man is not for himself, and the heavens and the earth will be destroyed......

Any life, by its very nature, is self-interested, and no matter what you do, you will always be more or less inclined to conclusions that are more or less favorable to you......

This has nothing to do with the so-called morality, but only the heart in the pure sense!

It can be said that the reason why people hate loss is, to a large extent, because there is an underlying egoistic thought......

Compared with self-interest, benefiting others is also a potential need of people......

Self-interest is the instinct of all life, and self-interest is an attribute that any kind of social animal must have......

The so-called everyone for me, I for everyone, is such a truth......

Any individual, in the group, must have its own value and significance, each individual, should be helpful to the whole group, have something to pay, the existence of each individual, should be meaningful......

And the benefit of man and self-interest, although it seems contradictory, is actually not impossible to be unified......

A good humane order is often sufficient to bring the two modes of behavior of benefiting and self-serving people to a state of high unity......

Many times, people always experience the contradiction between law and morality, and this contradiction arises, in essence, as a consequence of an imperfect judicial system......

In a truly good social system, no one needs to face this contradiction on the legal and moral levels, because the legal and moral aspects will be in a completely unified state......

In fact, this is the contradiction and unity between benefiting people and self-interest!

――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――― ―――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――

Whether there will be a contradiction between self-interest and self-interest seems to many people to be almost inevitable......

A good person must give up a part of his own interests, and a self-interested person seems to have to harm others in order to benefit himself......

However, this notion is inherently wrong......

Whether it is benefiting others or self-interest, it is actually part of human nature......

People use egoism to ensure that they do not suffer losses, and they are willing to obtain psychological satisfaction by sacrificing part of their own interests, which is actually the dual embodiment of self-interest and self-interest!

To give you a simple example......

Someone was waiting for the bus at the bus stop, and suddenly a person who was waiting for the bus suddenly had a seizure and fell to the ground......

In the entire bus station, there is no third party, at this time for this person, calling an ambulance or calling the police, it will be a matter of course, although this behavior may make the person late for work, and may even be deducted from the bonus, but for the vast majority of people, such a price is actually not unacceptable, at least compared to the condemnation of the heart of not saving death, such a price can be said to be completely negligible......

To put it simply, calling the police or calling an ambulance, in essence, is an act that benefits others, but this kind of behavior will make one's heart satisfied and peaceful, and this satisfaction and tranquility exceed the punishment that may be suffered by oneself because of being late, so this behavior is a kind of behavior that benefits others and oneself......

This is where the two are highly unified!

If the penalty for being late is not just a penalty of bonus, but expulsion, then the situation is completely different......

At this time, the attribute of self-interest may have the upper hand, this person may make a phone call, will choose to catch the bus as soon as possible, or simply do not even have a big phone, and take the bus directly to work, in this process, although the heart may be subject to a certain strong conscience, but compared to the loss of work, this kind of conscience condemnation, it is not a big deal......

At this time, there is actually a contradiction between benefiting people and self-interest......

If you want to benefit yourself, you have to hurt others, and if you want to benefit others, you have to hurt yourself......

Among the choices between harming others and benefiting oneself and harming oneself and others, I am afraid that the vast majority of people will choose the latter......

They make such a choice not because they want to harm the interests of others, but simply because they don't want to harm their own interests, that's all!

Yes, that's all!

Of course, in a sense, any source that hinders the unity of self-interest and self-interest is an obstacle to the development of the humanitarian order......

――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――― ―――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――

In many cases, why do some cases provoke public anger after they are tried?

The reason is very simple, it is nothing more than that in the case, there is a contradiction between law and morality, so that people have to face the choice of harming others and benefiting themselves, or harming themselves and others, and these two choices, no matter which one they are, are actually very, very bad......

Although you can gain benefits by harming others and benefiting yourself, you will inevitably suffer moral condemnation, and although you can be praised for harming yourself and benefiting others, you must suffer in the end, no matter which choice you make, in a sense, it is not a good choice......

In a sense, giving this choice itself is actually a mistake, in fact, it is inhumane!

Just like the classic question of who to save when the daughter-in-law and the mother fall into the river at the same time, it is actually also a very inhumane problem, because such a situation itself should not occur, and once it appears, it is bound to be impossible to reach a perfect conclusion......

A good order, when people are confronted with problems, must be able to find a perfect conclusion that can be reached not only from the legal level, but also from the moral level......

A bad humane order will always force people to choose between harming others and benefiting themselves, or harming themselves and benefiting others, and the vast majority of people, when choosing face-to-face, often end up choosing to harm others and benefit themselves, so the social atmosphere will naturally become corrupt......

Let's take a simple example!

Incurable disease!

Yes, terminal illness!

In fact, terminal illness is a very unsolvable social problem!

When a person's family, relatives and loved ones are terminally ill, what choice should they make?

It is to borrow money with all his strength just to let the patient live for a while longer, and after winning everyone's praise, he finally makes himself miserable and depressed because of poverty......

Or do you choose to escape, give up treatment, even if you are blamed by the vast majority of people, bear huge psychological pressure, and do not let yourself be burdened with huge debts, and continue to live a relatively comfortable and comfortable life?

At the end of the day, it's a dilemma in itself!

Neither choice is right under the humane social order, and any choice represents irreparable suffering......

In the final analysis, the reason why this kind of suffering exists, in essence, is actually a lack of social order......

――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――― ―――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――

After all, the reason why a terminal illness is called a terminal illness actually clearly explains one thing......

That is, if you have this disease, you are basically not saved, and you will always die in a short time......

As for how long you can live, it is usually the case that the doctor will say, what is the three-year survival rate of this disease, what is the five-year survival rate, and listening to this description, it is actually enough to make people creepy......

How long they can live depends largely on how much money the patient can afford to treat the disease, and in many cases, basically, it is a bottomless pit......

If it is a disease that can be completely cured, I am afraid that the vast majority of people, even if they are in debt, will be willing to treat their loved ones, but if it is a disease that is hopeless to completely cure and can only continue life, in the face of such a terminal illness, many times they can only fall into a dilemma and despair......

The choice to give up is morally condemned, while the choice to continue is to bear the economic pain of oneself, and this choice is inhumane in itself......

In the face of such a choice, no matter what it is, I am afraid it is difficult to make a decision, just like in the Tianlong Babu, the reason why Qiao Feng finally committed suicide is largely because the problem he faced is itself an untiring knot, he has the blood of the Khitan people, but he has the heart of the Song people, in the face of national hatred, he can never have both, so in the end he can only choose to end his own life......

In the same way, it is actually the same for Guo Jing......

Guo Jing grew up in Mongolia since he was a child, and he actually has a certain affection for Mongolia, so he is unwilling and unable to lead Haojie to blow up the Mongols' powder kegs like Yang Guo, or assassinate the other party's generals......

He was unwilling to use the most extreme means against the Mongols, but he could not give up Xiangyang, because giving up Xiangyang would mean turning his back on the Great Song Dynasty, so in the end he could only die in Xiangyang!

This is also Guo Jing's fate!

However, a good humane order, in essence, is to avoid people going through this dilemma!

(To be continued.) )