On the last day of November 1996, the round of 16 of the 3rd "Ying's Cup" began.

The "Ying Cup" is a three-and-a-half-hour match for each side, which is half an hour longer than other world competitions. Normally, a set ends around 6 p.m.

But in one of today's eight games, the situation was already very clear at 4 p.m. or even a little earlier, and the outcome was out of suspense early.

This game of chess is the game between Li Xiaoqiang and Yitian Jiji.

In the viewing room, reporter Zhang Da smiled:

"Xiaoqiang, this guy, even if he is self-aware, he didn't dare to bet with me yesterday."

Not far from reporter Zhang Da, Fujisawa Hideyuki stared at the chessboard in front of him, and his classic comment came out of his mouth again:

"This chess makes my stomach hurt......"

Don't wonder why Hideyuki Fujisawa is here, because he is also one of the players participating in this year's Ying Cup. It's just that he was eliminated in the first round. It was Li Shifo who eliminated him, and it was the only official game between the two of them in their lives.

Mr. Fujisawa is now 70 years old, and even so, he still did not set a record for the oldest person to participate in the World Series at such an age. This record is held by Mr. Eio Sakata. Sakata, who is five years older than Fujisawa, passed the domestic qualifiers in the Fujitsu Cup a few years ago, and finally represented Japan in the Fujitsu Cup, which is the oldest participation in the World Series.

As long as you look at the appearance of reporter Zhang Da, you should know that the chess that made Mr. Xiuxing "have a stomachache" today should not have been played by Li Xiaoqiang. Mr. Hideyuki should be criticizing Noriki Ita by now.

That's right, if you analyze the situation on this chess board at this time, you will find that Li Xiaoqiang is already far ahead. Since the beginning of the Three Kingdoms Tournament, Li Xiaoqiang's luck seems to have been not very good. In today's game, Li Xiaoqiang took the lead in black, but this was not the result of Li Xiaoqiang's active choice. You must know that this is the "Ying's Cup". The implementation is a big sticker.,And guessing first is also the right to choose.,Ida Kiki, who guessed the choice before the game, chose to hold the white later.。

Obviously, it seems that the result of guessing did not have any effect on the game. By the time the game reached around 4 o'clock in the afternoon, there were less than 150 moves, but the situation of Noriki Ita was already very bad, and the black board was already more than 15 meshes ahead. Not only that, but even judging from the thickness of the chess, Li Xiaoqiang's black chess seems to be a little thicker than the white chess.

Empty and multi-chess by thick! And the real sky is not a star and a half. is still the same sentence, even if this chess is to let reporter Zhang Da replace Li Xiaoqiang to continue. It is estimated that it will be difficult to lose. Therefore, it can be said that when the game is carried out at this time, there is no suspense about the outcome of this game, and Li Xiaoqiang's victory is only a matter of time.

In the game of professional chess players, if there are less than 150 moves, there is such a big difference. It usually can't be because one side of the game is playing particularly well. More likely, one side plays particularly poorly, or makes a particularly serious mistake.

The same is true for today's game of chess, the key to the victory or defeat of this game is not because Li Xiaoqiang played particularly well. It's because of a mistake by Kiki Ita. It's just that Yitian Kiki's mistake looks a bit ordinary, but it looks a little special. This mistake may seem simple, but it is unexpected. So. Ita Kiki's mistake naturally became a topic of discussion in the research room at this time.

In the research room, the elated reporter Zhang Da said in an exaggerated tone:

"Haha it's a "big avalanche" again! Xiaoqiang has recently been entangled with the "big avalanche". However, it is estimated that after this game of chess, no one should dare to practice the "big avalanche" in front of Xiaoqiang. But then again. He simply "turned out" today, and he was able to play the effect of "flying knives", which is unexpected. ”

That's right. There are two key words in reporter Zhang Da's words, one is "big avalanche", Li Xiaoqiang's victory is related to "big avalanche", this should be no problem.

Another key word, that is, "external abduction", "big avalanche external abduction"! Li Xiaoqiang has made a change in the "big avalanche outward" that has been rare in recent years, which is the focus of everyone's discussion.

Speaking of the "Great Avalanche Outer Turning Formula", this is actually nothing unusual, this is a very ordinary and ancient formula. Anyone who has played Go knows that in the large formula of "Great Avalanche", one move is an important point of divergence, at this time, you can choose "inward inversion", then the later branches are collectively called "Great Avalanche Inward Corner". In the same way, if you "turn out" at that time, then you will form a "big avalanche out of the corner".

The "Great Avalanche Inward Turning Style" was taken by Mr. Wu Qingyuan, and it can be said that the "Inward Turning" step was Mr. Wu's first initiative. Before that, when a chess player encountered a "big avalanche", it was without exception a "foreign abduction". Therefore, from this point of view, the "big avalanche outward turning" can certainly be called a very old formula, at least it is much older than the "big avalanche inward turning".

Since Mr. Wu's "internal abduction" change, the "external abduction" method has gradually become less. Ten years ago, this "outward turn" was occasionally seen, but now, it has almost disappeared from professional chess players. It can even be said that in this era, the "big avalanche outward turn" is almost a formula that has been eliminated.

Why don't you like to go under the "big avalanche"? Is there a deeper reason for this? To understand this problem, we must start with Mr. Wu's original intention of "internal abduction".

Many people know that when Mr. Wu played the "internal turn" for the first time in actual combat, he should not have conducted research in advance, and his original intention was to think that this "internal turn" should be able to cheapen 2 chess.

Don't underestimate these two chess, it can be said that it is because of these two chess pieces that the ancient formula of "big avalanche" has undergone major changes. Not only the "big avalanche", but also the elimination and change of many stereotypes in Go are actually caused by another two-eyed chess.

You can imagine that when others want to cheapen your 2-game chess, it is more important to wait for you to calculate and find that the move is really true, then you will naturally have doubts about the previous formula.

The reason why the "fixed formula" in Go can be called "fixed formula" is that there is only one criterion for judging. It is when everyone thinks that "local bifurcation" can be called a fixed formula. Now since someone else's "cheap 2 mesh" method can be established, can the previous method still be called a "fixed formula"?

The reason for this should not be difficult to understand, right? This is the reason why "big avalanche turns" are becoming rare.

Of course, there is also a big limitation of the "fixed formula" in Go, that is, the judgment of the "fixed formula" is always only valid locally. What if you look at the problem from a global perspective? It is quite possible that you will choose a change that looks like a slight loss, but can be exchanged for a global profit.

Why do so many masters scoff at the formula? Why do masters repeatedly emphasize that they can't memorize the formula? This is actually the main reason.

And this reason is the key to Li Xiaoqiang's victory in this game of chess today.

"Yitian, this guy, he's really abnormal today. He really should have been spanked today. He took the initiative to provoke a "big avalanche", and even ignored the fact that others might choose to "turn outside". It's okay to ignore other people's choices, he is not familiar with the changes that follow. Alas! Playing chess always only focuses on the part, and there is no overall concept in chess. How can this be done, how can this win Li Xiaoqiang's ......"

In the viewing room, Mr. Fujisawa Hideyuki was chattering about the number of Ita Kiki's.

Listening to Mr. Xiuxing's nagging, reporter Zhang Da thought more. Indeed, the context of today's game is actually very simple. As Mr. Fujisawa Hideyuki said, when Noriki Ita took the initiative to choose the "big avalanche". He definitely didn't consider the overall configuration when he played the game, he definitely didn't expect Li Xiaoqiang to make a "turnaround" change that had been "eliminated", and he took it for granted that Li Xiaoqiang would "turn inside". Forget it for granted, what's more deadly. He doesn't seem to be very familiar with the changes in the "big avalanche outward".

What is the difference between "avalanche external turning" and "internal turning", that is, "internal turning" is slightly more realistic, while "external turning" focuses on external potential.

Today's game of chess is like this, Li Xiaoqiang is in a "big avalanche of turning" changes. He played the classic "roll-and-pack receive" in Go, although from a local point of view, Ita Kiki gained a lot of ground in this place. But looking at the overall situation, when this change is completed, it can be said that the general trend of Tian Kiji will go.

But then again, in today's game of chess, is Ita Kiki really abnormal? Reporter Zhang Da thinks it can't be counted. Yi Tian didn't notice that Li Xiaoqiang might be "turned outside", which can be said to be a mindset, even if he wants to find faults, he can only say that his overall concept is not strong enough. However, the "overall situation" in Go is a very profound topic. Ita Kiki is lacking in this regard, which is certainly not an "aberration".

As for his unfamiliarity with the changes in the "Great Avalanche Turn", it is even less of an anomaly. It's completely understandable that today's Go seems to be developing rapidly, and new changes are emerging every day, even if Yitian is very hardworking, he may not even be able to study the new changes, a formula that is recognized to have been eliminated, is it necessary for him to understand so much.

But reporter Zhang Da faintly felt that something was wrong. Go is so broad and profound, is it really right to open up new changes while discarding old ones? From this point of view, is it really true that people are complacent that Go technology has been improving?

At this time, reporter Zhang Da suddenly remembered what Li Xiaoqiang said yesterday:

"No, there are a lot of chess games in reality, and I think it can fully prove that my point ...... right" (to be continued.) )

PS: There should be many chess players who can see that today's game of chess also has a prototype. This is a game in which "Brother Niu" Qiu Jun won against the little spy last year. Don't look at the little spy who is now infinitely beautiful, and this is not the first time that other Zhongniu brothers have similar knives. I have the impression that he had another plate last year that was very similar to this one, which was "rolled and packed" by Brother Niu. If you are interested, you can find it for yourself. A professional chess player once commented that the little spy is like a "strengthened version" of Ma Xiao, and his small kung fu is the best in the world, but in the overall situation, he is slightly inferior to Lao Nie. I think there is some truth to that.

After gossiping, finally ask for votes again!

Thank you!