Congratulations, you answered correctly.

Taking advantage of the absence of the enemy, Li Hu and Wang Jiayi launched an all-round attack on the second tower. Sadly, this time they didn't succeed. Instead, Daji stopped, "If you want to push our tower, you have to step over my corpse first, otherwise, don't even think about it." ”

After a brief eye contact, Arthur and Di Renjie returned to the city together. May you walk out of half your life and return still full of blood, a vow like this can only be fulfilled unless you hit the king.

The enemy's Monkey King had already destroyed a defense tower at the end of the development path, and when he saw the question that popped up on the screen, he regretted his actions just now, and he knew that he would go to the jungle.

This kind of Glory of Kings gameplay is the same as the dark chess in military chess, which chess piece you turn out, then it has begun to be born. Tower, if you make it disappear, then it's a problem.

The others are compulsory high school questions, which have been studied in class, which is true. But the problem that Sun Wukong encountered was the same as his master's recitation of the mantra, which was a headache.

Facing it, I'm afraid that I won't be able to answer. Don't face it, others still think that they take their mobile phones to read novels in class, and they don't listen to the lectures at all. If this style continues, how will I go to university in the future?

At this time, Sun Wukong's hands were trembling, completely different from when he made trouble in the Heavenly Palace five hundred years ago, and the courage and spirit of confrontation at the beginning were gone. Yes, there is only one heart left to do the question.

Although it's an art question, I guess it's very simple. If you want to ask who the author of the "Mona Lisa" is, write directly. Finch was right. If you ask how many years it came out, this ordinary person really doesn't know. Forget it, click on it and take a look. If it's a world ban on painting or something, I guess it won't be selected as an exam question. Along with many texts, there is also a painting. According to scientific research, people have a deeper impression of portraits than they do of words.

I saw an old man sitting on the picture, which was a typical oil painting. It's all at this time, Song Zhifei, the player of Sun Wukong, is still thinking about dreaming, if I see my little brother, I will take a screenshot and save it as soon as possible. As for setting up wallpapers, posting and talking, and the circle of friends, it's all a matter of time or time, and it's not in a hurry. Sure enough, some girls like to be full of fantasy, and their imagination is simply wild. This portrait is an oil painting, which looks similar to the photograph and is particularly realistic. As if he had seen it somewhere, he tried to recall it, but he couldn't remember. Immediately, Sun Wukong went to look at the text on the right side of the picture.

It is a life-size sketch, and when it is finished, it is placed in a hall, and when the Pope's subordinates come in, they hurriedly take off their hats and salute, and he thinks the real Pope sits there. The Pope himself said of the work: "Too similar, too similar,...... It's too much of a resemblance! ...... "Later the work was collected by the Pope and was never exhibited. Regarding the collection, it feels the same in ancient and modern times. According to rumors, there is Li Shimin's collection of "Orchid Pavilion Collection Preface", and there is also the Pope's collection of "Portrait of Pope Innocent X". The difference between the two is that one is a poem, which has to be memorized, and it has to be written silently after memorizing. On the other hand, you don't need to memorize it, just read it and understand it.

How she wished it wasn't Innocent X, but a handsome little guy. Girls, it's normal to have a little fantasy, hehe.

Portrait of Pope Innocent X, depicting Pope Innocent X, who ascended the throne in 1644. In the notes of the contemporaries, it seems that the Pope never made a good impression, and even he was considered the ugliest man in all of Rome. It is said that his face is not symmetrical, his forehead is bald, he looks somewhat deformed, and his temper is irritable. However, it is such an ugly and gloomy man who has become an excellent subject for depiction in the pen of Diego Velazquez. In 1650, Diego Velázquez came to Italy again and left this precious portrait of the Pope. The painter chose the scene of the Pope sitting in a precarious position, which is very befitting of his status.

Seeing this, Song Zhifei had to say a few words. If such a boy confesses to himself, it must be 10,000 non-agrees. First of all, his appearance is not up to par, and secondly, it is still his appearance. No, and the Pope is no exception. The face is asymmetrical, isn't that two-faced? The forehead is bald, either bald or Xie Guangkun. Grumpy and irritable, a bit like my mother, if you have such a boyfriend, wouldn't you have to nag every day.

Hey, the floor is mopping, the TV hasn't been turned off yet, and the lights are still on when no one is in the kitchen. Song Zhifei shook his head, forget it, I feel unreliable when I think about it. So, she looked down again.

In this portrait, the painter shows both the ferocity and cunning of the man, as well as the mental weakness of the seventy-six-year-old man. The Pope on the picture, although his face showed a strong and powerful expression for a moment, his two hands on the chair looked extremely weak. The painter skillfully grasped this point to make the figure more individual, thus adding a lot of associations to the audience. Is there a Lenovo, no.

The oil painting technique of this work is also excellent. On the picture, the fiery red silk shows a unique religious atmosphere; The white vestment and the red shawl create a strong color contrast. The brushstrokes are very smooth and free, showing the artist's great skill. When the portrait was presented to the Pope, the Pope said in surprise and with trepidation: "Too much likeness". It can be seen that this painting is highly realistic and realistic. This authentic, profound masterpiece of portraiture caused a sensation in Rome, and many people copied it, studying and admiring it as if it were a miracle.

Seeing this, Song Zhifei almost couldn't stand it, do you say this is a topic or something, so long. If it weren't for the fact that there were still a few paragraphs that were almost over, she wouldn't have bothered to read them. Rubbing her eyes, she had no choice but to continue looking.

Most of the famous paintings can hardly arouse the surprise of the audience's visual experience, and because they are familiar, they have always been praised so highly that they are tireless. However, Velázquez's Portrait of Pope Innocent X seems to be an exception. Although it has been around for more than 300 years, it still has a powerful impact on the senses of contemporary audiences. In the form of this painting, it is no different from other portrait paintings in Europe at that time, and the posture and composition of the figures conform to the portrait tradition, which is in strong contrast to the unusual realism of this painting. It is reminiscent of Velázquez's contemporaries who commented on his work: "All the other works are paintings, and only this one is real." This painting was painted by Velázquez during his second visit to Italy. In Rome, as court painter to King Philip IV of Spain, Velázquez attended the 1650 celebrations presided over by Pope Innocent X. At that time, he also met with his contemporaries, the painter Poussin, the sculptor Bernini, and others. It was there, at the request of Innocent X, that Velázquez painted this famous portrait.

This truth clearly comes from the depth of the painter's observation of human nature. Velázquez and the eighteenth-century Spanish court painter Goya had similar biographies and artistic reputations, and both painted many portraits of the royal family and the nobility. But Goya made no secret of his contempt for the nobility of the court, and he focused on revealing the striking contrast between the nobles' ** gorgeous appearance and the sluggishness of their minds and the emptiness of their hearts, and his brush was as sharp as a blade. Velázquez, on the other hand, treats people of all identities equally, whether they are peddlers and pawns, or princes and nobles, he can "paint like his own". The Portrait of Pope Innocent X is a prime example of this, in which he simply represents the subject as a "person", painting his identity and his character. From such a work, the author's likes and dislikes are not visible, because he does not "intervene", he "observes". Because of this, Velázquez's portrait of the Pope can almost be described as "objective" realistic painting in an era before the invention of photography. There is no exaggeration in the painting, everything is faithful to what the painter sees.

After having introduced so much, the final question is really tricky, asking who is the author of this painting? I think that Sun Wukong at this time must just want to shout "Master, help".