In the next paragraph,

"You said it easily. My friend said that at first sight, I wanted to find a chance to talk, right? What if we can't talk together? If neither of them speaks, who will be silenced? With a common topic, it is necessary to think about living together in the future, is it another bunch of problems? At my age, most of the relationships are rushing to get married, I can't wait to get married, find that it is not suitable, and then divorce, right? "The first three question marks, the worst case is nothing more than two people with completely different ideas or even completely contradictory, completely without any common interests and hobbies, and how to communicate between people who live in two different places, so it is difficult to talk about one thing that is familiar to each other, in fact, this is an impossible extreme situation, in this case one party needs to take the initiative to introduce their own life, and the other party needs to be patient to listen, understand and experience the other party's feelings.

The fourth question mark, future life, a bunch of problems, this no one can avoid, when to fall in love can not be avoided, good communication, there are too many unknown factors in the future, full of challenges and adventures, if you know all the things that will happen next, life will have no taste.

The fifth question mark, about breaking up or divorce if it is not suitable, a few days ago in the diary "The Error of 20160318 Critical Feeling Theory" mentioned such a passage: "(1) People will change, yes (2) The feelings of people who have changed will change, yes (3) The feelings of people who have changed will change their feelings about others and even their views on the world, yes (4) Only when they are together will they know if they have feelings, yes (5) So if your crooked reasoning of relying on feelings is correct, the world will fall into chaos, The concept of trying it out together will become understandable, and the concept of divorce and breakup will also become understandable and even deeply rooted in the hearts of the people (6) I have never relied on feelings, and I used to confess by relying on the theory in that movie review and a sentence in someone else's text message. I feel that this kind of thing with a difference in thought really doesn't rely on the general.

"And recently, I also have a contradiction that I can't solve, on the one hand, once you get better, you must not take the initiative to let go, once you make a promise, if you take the initiative to dump the other party, no matter what the reason, you will feel guilty; On the other hand, if the other party feels that it is inappropriate, if the other party does not want to be together, if letting go can make the other party feel better, then passively accepting the other party's proposal to let go seems more morally noble, but even in this case, the guilty heart must still exist, after all, the harm is mutual; The idea of these two opposing sides is contradictory, and in addition, distinguishing between the two sides involves the question of what is appropriate, a passing standard needs to be given, and everyone has a different definition of suitability, and the better the character, the lower the standard value they can allow. In that "Quantitative Scoring Rules for Likes and Dislikes-Updating and Revision",The intention of I giving the first moral exception can be exceptionally +300 is to emphasize that compared with other projects,What I want more is a person who will not abandon me under any circumstances.,Other problems such as lack of suitability can be made up for through communication and exchanges.,In the words of the Hokage Obi-Earth BOSS,

"Although in the world of ninjas, people who break the rules are called waste, but... People who don't cherish their companions are not even as good as waste. Since it's also a waste, then I will choose to break the rules, and if someone says that people are not ninjas, then I will take down those so-called ninjas. "The woman mentioned later dumped the man, I don't agree with this approach, I'll talk about it later, here is the end.

This is also the reason why in the scoring rules, the points deducted for throwing others at a time are more than ten times that of being dumped once, and they are still infinitely overlapped.

Abandoning one's companion under no circumstances is unforgivable! A companion here refers to a companion. I believe that if you know who will be with you 100% in the future, and no other factor will abandon you unless you die, you will feel willing to do anything for him/her now.