Why don't I want to beat Mr. Wanning to death with a stick

"Ordinary Days of Pure Wear" reminds me of the classic "Don Quixote". "Don Quixote" mocks the traditional chivalric literature of the false big sky, while "Ping" teaches us that crossing is a stupid x.

"Ping" is not a romance, not a "clear piercing", or even a so-called "ordinary" text (I think there are still traces of idealization). "Ping" is a mockery and subversion of the culture. At the beginning, the adults threw out one by one through the cliché typical: Fengtian little stallion, thick black Chen Liangben, and "Qing Wear Girl" Sister Wanning. There are not many characters, but they are all the culmination of some kind of routine. You don't need to ink a lot to get a typical outrage. Because most of them have been friends with them for a long time, they will meet each other when they hear the voice.

Fengtian's kid was a victim of Xiaobaiwen, because Xiaobai was too powerful and made everyone laugh, and he didn't even bother to scold him.

Chen Liangben and Wanning seem to be taking the high-end route, and the beginning of their rebirth seems to be really prosperous, but it can be boldly speculated that these two did not win the kind of life they thought they would like in the later article. The "masterpieces" that allude to some of the black-bellied struggles are no different from Xiaobai's core ideas.

Wanning is a face, and standing behind her is the shadow of a hundred and ten "seniors". Reciting poems, making friends, novelty gadgets, doing business... How vulgar it is, behind the banner of modern thought, is actually a common flaw in the personality of our generation. Taking other people's things out to show off is not ashamed but proud, which shows how fragile the moral bottom line is in the case of insufficient supervision? Snobbery looks at people, always wants to climb to the center of power, and love, family, and friendship act as a material whitewash when necessary; Self-centered, indifferent, and concerned about others is superficial and superficial; In interpersonal communication, the relationship with parents is ranked last, and you can be moved by the story but not by your parents; Naive, immature, ignorant personality, pushing the responsibility to others, thinking that "Lao Tzu is the first in the world", but he did not take responsibility at the critical moment. But it is such a face, which has been sought after and respected like that. It turns out that the shining thing that we once liked was not gold......

But even the delirious, crazy and ridiculous Don Quixote character has a duality. Like Wan Ning, the more crazy he is, the greater the disaster he causes, and almost anyone who touches him will suffer a disaster. But he has always been the embodiment of idealism, representing a high degree of moral principles, a fearless spirit, a firm belief in justice, etc.

Of course, Wan Ning is not qualified to call herself an idealistic fighter, but if the world is all Shu Ning, why not be pitiful? Isn't conformism also a form of fly-camp doghood? Shuning is undoubtedly cute and worth learning. But if everyone is gentle, and the status of women may be low for a thousand years, sprinkling and cooking all day long, how will society view "a stomach full of useless poetry and songs"? Where will a truly talented woman be placed?

Of course, Shuning can carefully educate the enlightened next generation, but that is based on the premise that Shuning is a crossing girl. It is the promising Ming Jun who hinders the democratic process, and it is often the enthusiasm for the ordinary that stifles change. Shuning's spirit is certainly good, but it is not good. Wan Ning is of course annoying, but she doesn't have to be beaten to death with a stick.

Don Quixote's squire, Sancho Panza, is a typical image created as a contrast to Don Quixote. Don Quixote is full of fantasy, Sancho Panza is practical; Don Quixote was learned, while Sancho Panza was illiterate; Don Quixote was thin and tall, and Sancho Panza was fat and short. Sancho had the shortcomings of a petty proprietor, but when it came time to put him in the position of governing the island, he was able to act impartially, without favoritism, without corruption or bribery.

How similar are they to Shuning and Wanning? Wan Ning is Don Quixote, who is full of illusory ideals and fights windmills with a spear to show the majesty of a knight; Shuning is a Sancho who wants to enjoy the taste of life from relationships and material life. One of them is a ridiculous fantasist, the other is a pragmatist who lacks romance. But Wanning belongs to the past, and Shuning belongs to the future. With the advancement of the adult world and the rise of social capitalist values, the ideal person is not Wanning, but Shuning.

Sancho Panza contrasts the theme of the decline of faithfulness in a negative light. "Ping" shows that readers are gradually maturing, and YY culture is declining. And in Shuning and Wanning, some things have grown and some things have disappeared.

Wanning and Shuning are both a reflection of reality, when a person is growing into Shuning, she will be ashamed of her former Wanning's behavior, but if she completely becomes Shuning, it is inevitable to dig into her past self. It's just that at that time, she said that "selfish brain-dead" was "young and ignorant", just like her mother forgave us for our mistakes again and again.

P.S. hopes that at the end of Wanning's foreseeable tragic life, there will be a way to sublimate the whole text, and it is better to let her feel a little emotional, and not leave us with only ridicule and contempt.

Because of my selfishness, I've always felt that controversy is part of a good work.