In every era, there will be prophets, such as Copernicus, who have advanced wisdom and ideas, and most people will be overwhelmed by the general environment.

11 The identity of the prophet is transcendent from the times, and even if the body steps on the ground, the soul is bound to be alienated from the world, forming the posture of a bystander, which I call the unconscious spectator. The essence is the opposition of two different systems of thought. Crossing is a medium that gives the opportunity for two ideas to collide. Under the unconscious spectator posture, 11 the level of staying calm is much higher than the general level, and it is easier for her to break away from the subjective position of contradictions and conflicts, and the overall measurement can reach the best choice. Her compassion is not only a tolerance of material harm, but also a kind of concern for the fate of the group. It's not that I elevate 11, the dislocation of time and space will inevitably bring a sharper sense of history to those involved. The cognitive horizons constructed by aborigines (Xu Si et al.) and immigrants (11) in the same context, such as the difference between two-dimensional and three-dimensional, show a huge difference between plane and three-dimensional.

11. The essence of integration into society is the deconstruction of another system. Her excellent performance is even called perfect ~ beauty, which is due to her deep understanding of the essence of the system, "knowing yourself and knowing your opponent, and not being defeated in a hundred battles". She just needs to be firmly on the essence, in the rules. Similar to Qin Wenqiao and others, they are like clowns jumping off the beam, and all kinds of complicated appearances are just practical lessons to test the proficiency and skills of 11 new knowledge. She dialectically analyzed the advantages of crossing, plagiarizing poems, imitating modern commodities and the like are just superficial means, and the essence of crossing lies in the thoughts and vision of modern people. Not to mention the aunts and wives who are confined to the inner courtyard, even Xu Si, who has a wide footprint, high status, and a lot of experience, is also limited by the times. 11. Always insist on not knowing the outside world from the eyes of others, insisting on independent thinking, not being easily induced by others, not following others, and not arbitrarily applying old examples.

Yuan Niang and Xu Si and others are all people who are overwhelmed by the general environment. The character does not appear out of thin air (Yuan Niang's imitation of the eldest wife, Qiao Liuyu and Mrs. Qiao's inheritance), not a single line of development, there is a gradual enrichment and plumpness process, which conforms to the sociality of people and the characteristics of the times. They are specific people in specific circumstances, human nature is complex, and the simple definition of "good or bad" can only be for things and not for people. Etiquette, righteousness, benevolence and filial piety are the content of moral evaluation rather than the evaluation mechanism, and people choose the foothold of evaluation according to their own positions and preferences. In the eyes of the eldest wife, Yuan Niang is morally perfect, while in Xu Si's eyes, Yuan Niang is utilitarian and has a wrong position. To make a corollary, Yuan Niang and Xu Si, assuming that they are in the middle of an event, have to go through the following process: analysis-decision-action. First, collect information and analyze the background, direction, and significance of the event. secondly, judge the interests and interest tendencies, and formulate an action plan; Finally, practice and observe the results. Please note that there is no moral evaluation mechanism in this process, and morality only exists as a available content resource to support or cover up the injustice of the action. In other words, morality no longer has an evaluative function in an event, but is used as a support for the rationality of the development of the event, and is selected to persuade the relevant people. Once rationality is established, the action is considered just and ethical. Therefore, Yuan Niang will not think that she has done wrong, and Xu Si will not realize the guilt, the rationality of their self-identity has been established and is difficult to break.

From the perspective of the totality of the characters, I think that the moral evaluation of the "good or bad" nature of Xu Si and Yuan Niang is meaningless, and within the framework of the text, they are both reasonable. Judging the words and deeds of the ancients with modern concepts will inevitably lead to problems of one kind or another, and if we use this as the basis to draw a moral evaluation of the characters, we will actually lose the historical stance of fair evaluation. Since we are talking about the characters, please return to the original context. Of course, if you want to comment on a certain behavioral phenomenon, such as the difference between the wife and concubine system and the concubine, there is no original context limitation. For example, in the comparative evaluation of ancient and modern times, morality is definitely the focus of evaluation.

Regarding the image of Yuan Niang, Squeak did not comment subjectively in the text, and all evaluations were given by others in the natural development of the plot. After weighing many factors such as proximity and proximity, conflict of interests, etc., others came to an evaluation of Yuan Niang. It can be said that all the evaluations in the article have a subjective tendency. At this point, I appreciate Squeak's writing attitude and writing skills. Squeak is hidden in the text as a recorder, only watching but not participating, recording rather than telling, and trying to faithfully synchronize the depiction with almost objective white drawings rather than the reproduction narrative delayed after processing the organization. In the construction of the story, the author tries to avoid subjective emotional tendencies to induce readers, and we can freely choose the tone of reading, we can sympathize with Yuan Niang, and we can ignore Xu Si. The maturity of objective and mechanical narrative techniques marks the transformation of creative writing from low-level personal emotional experiential writing to higher-level writing that focuses on the living conditions of the group.

There is a common problem in online literature - the text structure has no authenticity and lacks objectivity. Authenticity does not mean documentary, but refers to the position of the author in the narrative of the text. When the reader begins to read, the emotional experience is self-generated, a new experience and perception, and the reader's unique situation is reproduced, and reading presents the characteristics of authenticity due to privacy and uniqueness. Some say that the author does not use the first person narration in the text, so the author is not in the text. The position of the author has nothing to do with the personal tone, but is implicit in the structure of the text. Where is the author when the reader reads? As mentioned above, the experience of reading is personal, private, and unique, and the author is not present when the experience is obtained. The reader perceives authenticity with a distinctly exclusive quality: I am present, I am watching, the truth is obtained by my senses, without going through others. In texts without authenticity, the author repeatedly reinforces the emotional tendencies of the narrator, and the power of third-party narration is everywhere outside of the characters in the story. At this time, reading is no longer personal and private, and readers cannot reproduce the situation alone, but can only obtain the open emotional resonance defined by the author in advance according to the author's guidance, and cannot obtain the only exclusive emotional experience.

In other words, the reader no longer delves into the text, but directly gets the reading experience from the author, and the process of obtaining the reading experience through situational reproduction is no longer necessary, which leads to serious consequences: the arrangement and occurrence and development of the characters and plots lose the meaning and ability to express thoughts and emotions, the conflicts and contradictions are deliberately arranged and exaggerated to appear false and meaningless, and the logical connection within the text is scattered and disorderly—because the development of the story is no longer driven by the objective contradictions of the internal logic of the text. Rather, it relies on the subjective will and emotional inclination of the author to artificially choose the arrangement. So, who, exactly, is reading? What is the basis of reading, and what is the value and significance of reading?

All kinds of messy ideas, I am a stream of consciousness, write wherever I think, the words of the family, welcome corrections and exchanges with content, and refuse meaningless accusations and quarrels.

I hope that Squeak can continue to hone his writing skills and bring us more in-depth words. Stick to the author's attitude, try to achieve artistic authenticity, objectivity, and reasonableness, although I really want to see a 1-on-1 love fairy tale, but I support your attitude. But well, I guess everyone will often see me out of control in the comment area, hehe.

www.Welcome book friends to come and read, the latest, fastest, and hottest serialized works are all here!